I'm just about to wrap this project up but I thought some of you might be interested in what I do to improve the FM selectivity of these old FM tuners and reduce the hiss from the digital HD sidebands some (most now) FM stations transmit.
This is going to be a long post so my apologies in advance
Here's the problem...
Back in the day, the entire FM band looked like this group of 3 FM channels centered on the station here in my area on 88.9mHz. It is not running HD so has no digital HD sidebands.
In this spectrum analyzer screenshot from my SDRplay RSPdx DSP receiver, you can see that the occupied bandwidth of the station's transmission is well within the allotted 200kHz bandwidth of it's FM channel. You can also see it's neighbors on 1st adjacent channels of 88.7 and 89.1 mHz as well. None of these stations is running HD. I have a rooftop omnidirectional antenna so most channels on the lower-powered low-end of the FM band are occupied here.
That said, the audio modulation we're interested in detecting and recovering in the radio is contained within the center 150kHz (+/- 75 kHz) region. Filters in radios generally are wider than this by a bit to keep distortion low etc. The shaded area in the center shows the (pretty close to perfect) 192kHz digital FIR filter (+/-96kHz) this DSP receiver uses.The old analog ceramic IF filters have a gradual slope on each side instead of the virtually perfect vertical "slope" of the digital FIR filter.
Since FM channels are spaced 200kHz apart and they (still) try to keep strong stations in a market at least 2 channels (400kHz) apart, tuners and receivers back in the day used fairly wide filters. For example, 300kHz (+/- 150kHz) filters allowed excellent adjacent channel selectivity (400kHz) and kept distortion low. The tradeoff is gain/distortion vs. the narrowness of the passband.
But 300kHz is too wide nowadays for stations transmitting HD. Here's the spectrum of my local (very strong) station on 92.3mHz that is running HD:
You can see that the digital HD sidebands start at just over 100kHz away and bleed into the 1st adjacent channels! While the nicely perfect 192kHz digital filter here (shaded area) avoids the HD sidebands completely, our nice, wide analog 300kHz filter is too wide to avoid picking up "hiss" from the inner parts of these HD sidebands, especially since it's slopes are much more gradual.
Thanks to the nice folks over at the Groups.IO FM Tuners group, members there have come up with a way to test and sweep ceramic filters using a device called the NanoVNA (used by Ham radio operators), a filter test fixture and a PC app that comes with the NanoVNA:
An IF strip in a vintage receiver is typified by the SX-850 which has three 3-pin 290kHz ceramic filters, all the same, basically in series: (they did this to improve the ultimate rejection outside the passband).
Here's a sweep of one of the Pioneer's original filters:
The -3 bandwidth of this filter is 293.333kHz (+/- 146.6kHz) so too wide to avoid those pesky HD sidebands that start at only +/- 100kHz.
Another issue with these analog ceramic filters is that they are not always centered on frequency. Ideally you want them centered perfectly at 10.700mHz. (the IF frequency used in virtually all FM radios)
This one is quite high at 10.739 mHz. Since it is so wide, this worked OK and kept the receiver manufacturers from having to hand-select filters.
So what can we do to help reduce the hiss? Replace one or two of the original filters at the end of the chain with a narrower filter.
In the case of this SX-850, I'm going to use one or two180kHz filters to replace the last or middle and last filters. Also, since I am able to hand-pick the center frequency, I'm going to replace the first one or two filters as well with 280kHz filters. All three filters will me selected to have close to the same center frequency. An IF alignment of the tuner will be needed afterwards.
Here's the sweep of the 180kHz filter. It actually has a -3dB bandwidth of 195kHz and a center frequency much closer to 10.700mHz: (the center frequency accuracy is more important with narrower filters)
You can also see that the gain of this more modern filter is pretty close to the original filter even though it is narrower. This keeps the sensitivity of the tuner high.
Some experimentation is required to end up with the best compromise between distortion, gain (sensitivity) and selectivity (avoidance of the HD sidebands). An added benefit of the increased selectivity is being able to nicely separate 2 (weaker) stations on adjacent channels! (as long as they aren't running HD)
Murata was the most common manufacturer of these ceramic filters but, unfortunately, most have been discontinued :-( You can still find them new from some suppliers and used or new/old stock on ebay. They can be found in either the older style 3-pin form factor or in the more modern surface-mount package. Once again, the fine folks at the FM Tuners group have come up with an adapter board to allow SMT filters to be converted to 3-pin.
Here's my SX-850 with 2 SMT 280kHz filters on the adapter boards in the first two positions followed by a 3-pin 180kHz filter:
400Hz distortion is still really good at 0.12%so I may try using two of the narrower filters instead of just one.
I know this was a lot. I'd be happy to answer any questions!
--Mark--