• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Technics SP10 mkII or Denon DP-80

I had thought about mentioning that JP owned both the SP-1000R and a SP10 MkIII as I saw some specs and plots that you had posted showing the differences of the two tables. It was right when they introduced the new SP-1000R, and I can remember which was the best but I think the new table was a slight bit better than MkIII, which is exceptional.
 
Last edited:
There is a long thread somewhere here as a lot of discussion regarding if the new table was going to any good and was it worth the price they were asking for it.
 
Last edited:
as well as the 6mm thick rubber mat from the original 1200 series. part number is RSG 0010 or some similar prefix.

I see... Mine is a 3.2mm thick (measured wit a caliper), bearing the ref N° below :

upload_2023-6-4_14-43-46.png

This is the same reference for the SL-1200G and SL-1200GR : I checked it, since I had these two TT at home for tests.

I noticed that there's a RSG 0010 and RSG 0008 models of TT mats :

upload_2023-6-4_14-47-41.png

So I think that the TEFX5019 rubber mat of my SL-1200GR is probably the equivalent of the RGS 0008... I retrieve ir on the KAB website :

upload_2023-6-4_15-1-40.png


But no traces of the RGS 0010, though : is ist still available ? Or reissued ?

also don't over look the tone arm resonance cap. One of the best 5 dollar upgrades out there in audioland.

What is it ? There's not much input about installation...

upload_2023-6-4_15-5-12.png

T
 
I had thought about mentioning that JP owned both the SP-1000R and a SP10 MkIII as I saw some specs and plots that you had posted showing the differences of the two tables. It was right when they introduced the new SP-1000R, and I can remember which was the best but I think the new table was a slight bit better than MkIII, which is exceptional.

10R - I had a few SH-10B5 plinths, wanted to run an EPA-500 arm, and I think the industrial design of the 1000R is a travesty. Round corner here, square corner there, etc. Even the placement of the speed buttons on the motor chassis gives me an eye tick.

10R is neck and neck with the MK3, though the MK3 is far, far more robustly built. Of all the 'tables here, and I think you know what they are, my primary 'table remains the MK3. To be fair part of that reason is because I've made modifications that give me -50% to +20% speed range which is really handy for some of the cartridge tests I do.

In regard to torque, one only need to read the published specs:

SP-10R 4kg. cm
SP-10MKII/2A 6kg. cm
SP-10MK3 16kg. cm
 
In my mind having good toque equates to better dynamics to overcome drag presented by the additional load placed on the motor from the stylus. I don't recall any white papers or any facts showing that a stylus tracking at 2 grams is any great load on a platter motor but in my head, I have this thought that it effects overall playback in some unmeasurable way. I don't have any way to prove it and most likely it is just a placebo effect, but as long as I think it helps it makes it better for me in some unmeasurable way.
 
DP-2000 here. Not entirely sure how it compares to the DP-75/80 but specs seem fairly similar. It also has the tape head / magnetic strip. No issues with it whatsoever. Hard to imagine I'll ever "upgrade" from here. I have a Grace 707 arm on it. Restored the whole thing myself. Lovely, lovely.

View attachment 2902521
What is that integrated amp underneath the DP-2000?
 
In my mind having good toque equates to better dynamics to overcome drag presented by the additional load placed on the motor from the stylus. I don't recall any white papers or any facts showing that a stylus tracking at 2 grams is any great load on a platter motor but in my head, I have this thought that it effects overall playback in some unmeasurable way. I don't have any way to prove it and most likely it is just a placebo effect, but as long as I think it helps it makes it better for me in some unmeasurable way.

Better startup elapse time to speed, too. Less susceptible to any outside forces --- like DJ fingers. ;)
 
Jogging my memory re torque read somewhere years ago the Japanese audio press divided tables into categories low/medium/high torque. Talking about higher end consumer and professional tables that would have different demands from users. The major mfgs like Technics, Denon, Sony etc kept abreast of each other issuing new models within months. From my experience and talking with other owners the Denon DP-75 is very adequate for home consumer use, the DP-80 would be more suited to meeting the daily rigors of broadcasting. The prior two Denon models the DP-6000 and DP-7000 are no slouches either introduced around the same time as the Technics SP-10Mk2 with the same professional and higher end consumer market in mind.
 
They're all fine, and nominal running torque (available or applied) is a fraction of start-up torque. I still enjoy seeing a 22lb platter come to speed in a quarter of a second.

I like the way the table can go from 33 to 45 RPM (and vice versa) in a blink of the eye.

I was told it takes a motor with healthy torque to be able to do that. :idea: :)
 
Well Tempered is an audiophile play toy. Not a professional, audiophile, reference, working Tool! Technics SP anything is Tool, workhorse, reference. Denon likewise but lesser standard. Kenwood L-07D also respected equally as workhorse, and as tool.

One of my turntables is a Well Tempered Classic and I would trade it towards an SP-10Mk2 in a heartbeat.
 
One of my turntables is a Well Tempered Classic and I would trade it towards an SP-10Mk2 in a heartbeat.

Works for you, so totally does not work for me, or for my needs. Enjoy yours. But please don't call it studio, reference, or workhorse standard. Ask anybody who cuts records for a living what they use even at home, you'd be surprised at what they use. And they hear master tapes all day long.
 
Works for you, so totally does not work for me, or for my needs. Enjoy yours. But please don't call it studio, reference, or workhorse standard. Ask anybody who cuts records for a living what they use even at home, you'd be surprised at what they use. And they hear master tapes all day long.

I think you misunderstood me, or confused me with another member. I would never call the WT any of those things. It’s overrated. I’d much rather have a Technics. The comparison between the two is shop class vs precision.
 
Last edited:
In my mind having good toque equates to better dynamics to overcome drag presented by the additional load placed on the motor from the stylus. I don't recall any white papers or any facts showing that a stylus tracking at 2 grams is any great load on a platter motor but in my head, I have this thought that it effects overall playback in some unmeasurable way. I don't have any way to prove it and most likely it is just a placebo effect, but as long as I think it helps it makes it better for me in some unmeasurable way.



Kuzma tested a turntable with a 50kg air bearing platter.getting it up to speed and removing the belt the platter due to the low friction air bearing took over 30 hours to stop spinning. Experiment repeated but this time the stylus was lowered on a record and the platter stopped spinning in a few minutes.
Chris
 
I think you misunderstood me. I would never call the WT any of those things. It’s overrated. I’d much rather have a Technics. The comparison between the two is shop class vs precision.

I did some research on the WTL due to some boastful claims here. I didn't find a foundation for those claims, but did think some of the value-engineering was ingenious for what it was.
 
Back
Top Bottom