Longest post in this thread which corresponds with the amount of time you’ve spent playing with a pair, right?
Me thinks you’ve made up your mind about the Zus and no amount of facts, opinions, experience is going to change that. Do you know how I formed my opinion about Klipsch Heresies? I ignored the online chatter, got a pair, set them up in my dedicated listening room, and put them through their paces to include different amps, sources and music genres. I tried to like them but alas found them fatiguing. But I gave them a good workout before drawing conclusions.
Marketing is marketing. Every speaker manufacturer uses it to make their products look good. Nothing unusual about it IMHO.
I’m still trying to figure out why Dirty Weekends (what a great moniker!) bring out so much emotion.
Read the post
"If you like them great!!"
If you figured them out-super duper.
But a quick look at the FR graph tells you why some don't like them.
Again-title of OP's thread....
I have heard them more then a few times
I wasn't impressed each time.
To me they sounded thin, tilted, overly colored mids-and the FR graph confirms what I heard.
(FIY-thats my own opinion I formulated. The other thread links were other peoples opinions.
I never mentioned I agreed with everything contained in them-they were FIY's)
Again in person hearing them-more then once-and after the fact looking at a FR graph
Yep thats what I did seem to hear.
Thats enough for most reasonable people to say "hey they aren't worth the hassle".
Lot's of great sounding speakers with the "it" factor out there.
Again-it's commendable you put in the effort to make them work.
Never mentioned I was not open to hearing a good sounding Zu setup.
I said I was skeptical given #1-my in person hearing the DW's so far, and #2 the awful FR graph.
Audio is full of surprises.
I do know, from personal experiences with working, and modding speakers for years- that sometimes a tilt with certain frequencies can cause one to think they are hearing more detail, a inner perspective, Memorex or live-when it's simply a frequency emphasis, etc.
Esp when you knee deep in a project.
So it's not like I haven't heard my share of different sounding speaker etc to begin with.
NOS Dac's also come to mind.
Some people feel they are life changing, organic, true to life-Memorex or live.
Others can't stand them.
To me the Zu's sounded like a incomplete DIY speaker project.
Zu did set themself up marketing wise IMHO.
Thats a valid part of this discussion, as to claims vs reality.
But that's not why I didn't like them so far.
As I pointed out.
I love some of Schiit's DACS, and own 2.
I think some of their marketing is lame-most of it honestly.
But I appreciate the end result in the 2 products I do have
As far as long post-I do it all the time
Whatever.....
Heresy's, the originals were made to be center speakers.
Bass thin, in your skull, narrow imaging.
Don't like the early versions.
The new ones sound pretty good IMHO, esp compared to the older ones.
Deeper bass, smoother FR, and wider sweet spot.
Frankly one of the best early Heresy's I heard had Dayton ST-255-12's in it.
For main listening I prefer full size floor standers without the need of subs.
Speakers that are high enough to project the sound throughout the room, regardless if your sitting or standing.
And have a wide sweet spot.
People, here including myself are passionate about audio.
Has little to do with a emotional response. per se.
Shop talk like lots of threads here.