what a terrible warped record!!! But the cartridge handles it without skipping, what cartridge is it?
I've seen this method before. It is particularly valuable information in that many, if not most, headshells cannot be rotated so a way to change the azimuth is required. This fits the bill quite well, I would say! What are you using for a shim in the center, if I might ask?A simple way to allow azimuth adjustment with fixed headshell, 1/8 turn on each side is a suitable increment
![]()
Prolly heat during the shipment. I've had a few like this.How does it do the edge warp?
Used scissors to cut a piece of plastic off a key card or credit card, Mastercard premium super gold extra plus made by Hawaiian virgins is best is best of courseI've seen this method before. It is particularly valuable information in that many, if not most, headshells cannot be rotated so a way to change the azimuth is required. This fits the bill quite well, I would say! What are you using for a shim in the center, if I might ask?
I would expect so, amigo......thanks for the tip.Every cartridge I own benefit from this azimuth adjustment
The MoFi Geo Disc features a raised line of sight for judging azimuth.Used scissors to cut a piece of plastic off a key card or credit card, Mastercard premium super gold extra plus made by Hawaiian virgins is best is best of course
A strip of suitable gauge copper wire could do the same I guess
On my SME V I use Wally's Fulcrum, google it and you see. Every cartridge I own benefit from this azimuth adjustment
Hi, need some advice. Want to spend up to $850 or so on a MC cartridge. Debating between AT 33SA and Hana SL MKii. Would love some feedback!! Leaning toward 33SA because I already have the 33mono and like to swap headshells on my technics SL 1200 MK2. Can keep my phono preamp settings the same, which would make things easy. But I have never heard a Hana and know there are lots of fans out there.
Personal expectations probably play a bigger role than physical differences. I happened to like the Shibata tips with my systems. However, alignment must be the best possible, to get the most out of these fine tips.that is not an easy call. I have both. They are somewhat different but not huge. Not to muddy the waters but with either cart, you may want to consider a nice step up trans into your MM input vs. using an MC input on your phono stage.
Hi, do you mind sharing what differences you thought they had? Are their voicings quite different? To me, the 33Sa is highly resolving and fairly neutral. I really do enjoy it - using with an AT630 SUT too, with great results. It’s getting a little long in the tooth though and am considering the Hana SL Mk2 as a replacement but unsure how it compares sonically to the 33Sa. Hard to get Shibata and a Boron pipe at the price of the 33Sa.that is not an easy call. I have both. They are somewhat different but not huge. Not to muddy the waters but with either cart, you may want to consider a nice step up trans into your MM input vs. using an MC input on your phono stage.
yes would tend to agree with your thoughts on the shibata tip. With a given suspension it should be able to track finer resolutions pressed into the vinyl.Personal expectations probably play a bigger role than physical differences. I happened to like the Shibata tips with my systems. However, alignment must be the best possible, to get the most out of these fine tips.
Hi, do you mind sharing what differences you thought they had? Are their voicings quite different? To me, the 33Sa is highly resolving and fairly neutral. I really do enjoy it - using with an AT630 SUT too, with great results. It’s getting a little long in the tooth though and am considering the Hana SL Mk2 as a replacement but unsure how it compares sonically to the 33Sa. Hard to get Shibata and a Boron pipe at the price of the 33Sa.
Or I may skip the SL and go with the new AT33xMLB for more of the same. Never tried Hana so unsure how it compares.
Many thanks.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I have the same but do not use it much. Not sure which alignment it gives. It depends also on how exact you point at the pivot point, I fooled myself with it , so I prefer two-point protractors.
Anyway a mirrorlike surface or CD is easier for visual azimuth I think. Using electrical Azimuth I get 2-8 db improvement after setting it visually.On some cartridges the stylus must be tilted 2-3 degrees to get a good electrical Azimuth..
… the top one showed above I returned , several degrees off! A USB microscope is very useful with my old eyes and not so steady hands..
Sorry if it wasn’t clear - comparing the differences between the cartridgesNot sure I understand. Do you mean differences between carts, or differences between SUTs and/or MC stages?
Sorry if it wasn’t clear - comparing the differences between the cartridges