Yes, they are going to be placed on bookshelves. I can sit on these bookshelves and bounce up and down and they don't move. I could put 5 pair of speakers on these with no problem. Thanks to everyone for their input, keep the ideas coming. I checked out the 590's and its very tempting. Still, Have a yen for some 112's. Don't have much time to make up my mind about the 590's. The one drawback to them are, I would have to put them on the floor. great deal though.
I heard those a couple or so years back, they were much better than the studio 530 that everyone is buying on 'sale'. The 530 sounds great at nearfield, desk etc. out in the room they weren't as good.To avoid the inconsistent directivity of the vintage L1xx or 43xx three ways, I would recommend the LSR6332.
The crossover points for both drivers are a good octave or more lower and eliminate the weird hourglass shaped image behavior.
Being a JBL nut, the L100s were always a favorite. For a medium sized room the L-1s were the last of a new breed of the redesigned "L" series from L1 thru L 7. JBLs purchase by HK and now Samsung left a bitter taste on the once iconic brand. The so called "New" L100s are way over priced and to me do not sound as robust as the original. My L100s were paired with the JBL B460 subwoofer and the L1s were used as rear channel speakers. Now they all reside in my den closet, waiting to be of service.Thats true about new speaker value but thats not really a concern, I paid 3 0r 4 hundred dollars for my L100's back in 1974 and they're worth a lot more now but will never sell. My kids will get all my gear. Nolasally, if you know of any 112's in the area let me know as I live fairly close to Raleigh.
Pull the L1s 1 inch from the rear wall of the cabinet wall..notice the difference!!As the original owner of a pair of L112s for now almost 40-years, I'd suggest you might also consider the L96 or the 4412 and 4410. They are all really too big to be actual "bookshelf" speakers but they are all wonderful speakers with similar voices. Are you hoping to actually set these on an actual bookshelf? I have the L1 also but I'll remind others that they are rear-ported so not really optimal for bookshelf positioning. My recently acquired S38 (series one) would actually be a pretty good choice for a bookshelf, but they may not be what you would consider vintage . . . unless you keep them for another decade!
A lot of that depends on your bookshelf, related to both depth and vertical and horizontal barriers. Why not just use a front-ported model? I've used the L20T and find them so similar to my L1s as to make the choice of one over the other dependent upon where they're being used. For the same price, the S38 really is superior to either.Pull the L1s 1 inch from the rear wall of the cabinet wall..notice the difference!!

Budget is not an issue. I would've bought the L100 Classics but not even close to being worth 4g's. Just want to try something in the JBL bookshelf line of which there are many. I've always read the L112's are very good sounding speakers but have never heard them. Anything that compares or are better than them I would be interested in. I would appreciate any and all opinions.
The L100s were originally designed for recording studio playback, for critical listening where as the L100 Classics are supposed to be for the "audiophile". If indeed the Classics were to "outclass" the original L100s, why not introduce them as a new speaker line, instead of a horning in on the reputation of a classic?Everything I’ve read about the L100 Classics indicates that they WAY outclass the original L100 by a significant margin.
Regarding the L1A lot of that depends on your bookshelf, related to both depth and vertical and horizontal barriers. Why not just use a front-ported model? I've used the L20T and find them so similar to my L1s as to make the choice of one over the other dependent upon where they're being used. For the same price, the S38 really is superior to either.![]()