• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

"Vintage" Mono Speaker Project

Pondoro

Active Member
I am considering a mono speaker – not an exact clone of any 1950’s design, but true to the standards of that day.

My speaker collection (all Magnavox)

One - 15” woofer from a 1959 or 1960 Belvedere console. 5.6 ohms per the schematic

Four 4” tweeters from that same console, 3.2 ohms each per the schematic

Two horns from the late 60’s or early 70’s. 7.6 ohms DC resistance

One ten-inch woofer from the late 60’s or early 70’s 7.4 ohms DC resistance


What do I know about them?

The Belvedere had a three way system – 15” and 8” run in parallel both are 5.6 ohms in the schematic. Plus two 3.2 ohm 4” tweeters in parallel protected by a 16 mfd capacitor. This implies 5500 Hz crossover, right? It also implies a very low total impedance. 2.8 ohm total impedance for the two bigger drivers assuming the tweeters are totally isolated by the capacitor. Even lower impedance at frequencies that lit up the tweeter? Am I missing something? I have to assume that Magnavox engineers in 1959 knew something. When I got the console there was one woofer and four tweeters. The 8” midranges were broken (mechanically). I had the tube amp rebuilt and it happily drives 8-ohm speakers and sounds great. It is still stereo. So this grab bag of speakers is laying around, while I wonder why the amp drove such a low load back in 1960.


The two horn speakers, a later design, maybe into the 70’s, came with 2.2 microfarad capacitors attached, which I think means crossover at 9500 Hz??? I have no idea what they were paired with. I have seen pictures of consoles with a 15” woofer and a horn, but older than these horns. I have seen pictures of newer consoles with similar horns but smaller woofers in the 70’s. I searched old forums and people on the internet call these 8 or 12 ohm, and maybe there were different values over the years. People recommend 1, 2.2, 3 and even 6 mfd capacitors.


The 10” woofer seems 1970-ish, it has a plastic cover over the back of the magnet. I cannot find out anymore about it, the numbers on it yield nothing in internet searches.


I could buy exact duplicates of the 15” woofer and replace the broken 5.6 ohm midrange speakers but I have better more modern speakers. I do not want to throw a lot of money at these speakers, I basically got them free. I have decided o build a mono speaker. Large case, open back, just what a Hi-Fi enthusiast might have built just before stereo became “the thing.”


Ideas (all would be mono) - In every case I would put a capacitor in series with the tweeters:

A. 15” and two parallel tweeters - this is the original without the broken 8” 5.6 ohm speaker.

B. 15” in parallel with the younger 10” (8-ohm?) and the two tweeters in parallel – this is as close to original as I can get, but the low impedance bothers me. Still Magnavox did it.

C. 15” and two series tweeters (better impedance match, but the original designers did not do this)

D. 10” and two series tweeters (better impedance match, 8 ohms and 7.2 ohms)

E. 15” and 10” and two series tweeters – series still makes more sense to me – but, again, Magnavox did not do this.

F. 15” and 10” in parallel with all four tweeters in series/parallel to give 3.6 ohms for the four tweeters

G. 15” with a vintage Magnavox horn tweeter

H. 10” with a vintage Magnavox horn tweeter – this approximates what I think Magnavox evolved to in the 1970’s

I. 15” and 10” with a vintage Magnavox horn tweeter – because why not?

Modern audiophiles may scorn open back speakers or Magnavox as an entity, and I know as the 1950’s rolled on to the 1970’s all US companies struggled and cut costs as they slowly declined. But I have to think that in 1959 the engineers actually listened to their product and tried different crossover frequencies and asked each other “does that sound better?”


Whatever I build will be tested with the original tube amp (one channel, anyway!) It survived the crazy all parallel speakers with whatever low impedance they gave. The catalog implies that you could buy one console and run it mono then add a second channel, there is a switch that lets you turn the extension cabinet off or on. I would run it with no input into one channel and an 8 ohm resistor on the output of the “dormant” channel.


If you have read this far I thank you! I would love some idea.
 
Register to hide this ad
I find this very interesting, but I wonder if you'd be better off to move this to the Speaker forum...
 
Great find!
My advice would be to FIND ANOTHER A10
A PAIR of Allegros makes a real nice "integrated" mono-block setup
(especially if you're fond of EL84s as many are)
Here's what my pair looked like after I was done with them
They sounded GREAT with just my Nano and a pair of LaScalas
(I sold them locally for $400)

Wop

I find this very interesting, but I wonder if you'd be better off to move this to the Speaker forum..
 
This is a Magnavox 15" from 57, sounds great in a open baffle. If you want more high end just add a tweeter with a capacitor as a low pass. I've never really felt mine needed more high end.

 
This is a Magnavox 15" from 57, sounds great in a open baffle. If you want more high end just add a tweeter with a capacitor as a low pass. I've never really felt mine needed more high end.

I am strongly considering an open baffle with a removable tweeter section so I can swap tweeters. I would also swap capacitors. Open baffle makes this easy. How did you decide on baffle size?
 
I am strongly considering an open baffle with a removable tweeter section so I can swap tweeters. I would also swap capacitors. Open baffle makes this easy. How did you decide on baffle size?

I had a piece of plywood that looked about right. I cut the hole in it and put some supports on back to let it lean back about ten degrees. I gave it a try and it sounded good so I painted it and put it to use. It has plenty of bass, nice mids and smooth highs. I'm powering it with the amp that came from the console I got the 15" out of. I forget the model number, but its a push pull 6V6 GT mono amp.
 
I had a piece of plywood that looked about right. I cut the hole in it and put some supports on back to let it lean back about ten degrees. I gave it a try and it sounded good so I painted it and put it to use. It has plenty of bass, nice mids and smooth highs. I'm powering it with the amp that came from the console I got the 15" out of. I forget the model number, but its a push pull 6V6 GT mono amp.
That’s my exact history with this speaker. The push pull 6V6 amp has been rebuilt and is one of my two regular stereo amps, this 15” speaker is left over.
 
I have been reading a lot about open baffles, and especially the history of the Wharfdale SFB3. I realize that Wharfdale made their own, unique drivers. With my collection of old Magnavox speakers I can explore the question, What if an impatient Magnavox executive had told his director of engineering to, “Go clone a Wharfdale, NOW!”, using drivers that he had on hand. Total investment is probably $30 worth of plywood. I’m not planning to fill it with sand.
 
So the Wharfdale SFP3 was 34" wide by 31" tall. But my "Magdale" is going to use a 15" Magnavox driver, I figured I should make my baffle a bit larger. Still I have to live in this house. I cut a 36" wide by 32" tall piece of 1/2" plywood. I will stiffen it with ribs on the back - I do not want to bring sand into this. I have a business trip that will delay further progress for some time.
 
The 15" Magnavox had a phase plug. So they were not unwilling to spend money. I am still puzzled that the 8" and 12" speakers were run in parallel and not crossed over. But if they were simply being cheap that phase plug requires a piece of custom molded plastic, two rivets, and made the hole for the woofer into four cuts instead of one circular cut. Maybe they needed the cross members to stiffen the cheap Masonite front panel?

I guess I will try the phase plug on my Magdale.
 

Attachments

  • Phase plug.jpg
    Phase plug.jpg
    115.7 KB · Views: 15
The front board, not cut yet. It is wider than shown in this picture. 10" 70's era Magnavox and 15" 59-60 Magnavox.
 

Attachments

  • Board Smaller.jpg
    Board Smaller.jpg
    101.2 KB · Views: 21
Remember the ground rules of my project -
Mono, because I do not have enough speakers for stereo.

The scenario - An excited Magnavox executive wants some poor engineer with no budget to clone the Wharfdale SFB3. The engineer has a lot of stuff to choose from.

Since I have the phase plug I assume the guy in 1950-whatever would have it as well. So I will try the phase plug on my project.

There are not going to be any blind tests. I have zero foregone conclusions and no ego invested in any outcomes.

I do not play vinyl but I have a few mono CD's from mono recordings that were not reprocessed into stereo. These will be my test media.
 
I’ve been on a business trip and unable to actually cut wood for my project. But I have been searching the forums and DIY sites. Remarks seem to fall into two categories: “You need to know what you’re doing, open baffles are not simple” or “I threw this thing together and it sounds great!” I understand that most people are doing stereo. My mono project is not the same kettle of fish. We shall see.
 
I guess I will try the phase plug on my Magdale.
The crossbar is for speaker protection. The phase plug stops the beaming of the larger drivers. The Wharfedale SFB was designed to compete with the Quad ESL 57. Both were originally mono era.
 
The presence of the phase plug supports my theory that Magnavox engineers were not designing to a minimum parts cost. Certainly cost mattered but that plastic cup probably cost more than an inductor. So I suspect the engineers liked the sound with the cup better than without. Did they experiment with any other crossover designs? We will never know. I plan to try various crossover designs and with/without the phase plug. But both Magnavox and Wharfdale ran systems with two large woofers in parallel and full range. Both companies did use a capacitor on the tweeter. So more than one company liked that sound.
 
Advice sought - the 15" woofer was installed and as far as I know never disturbed for 60 years. Do I install it right side up or inverted? Argue politely if you wish. I truly am neutral on this.
 
Back
Top Bottom