Bigboi33
Dazed and Confused
I can totally understand where the OP is coming from.
I had a similar experience as I climbed up the ladder. Some recordings really started to show their shortcomings. It got to a point where I had to do like others did and started culling out record albums that didn't give me the listening experience I was after. I was honestly upset about it for a few months, inevitably chasing a dream that all my recordings will sound excellent. I had zero success trying to balance it all.
The success I did have was placing all the culled record albums into a box and relegated them to the garage system, where I actually do more listening (not critical, eye's closed euphoria listening but getting lost in the music and my work). Here I found out that it wasn't my system after all. It was the music production itself. My garage system (basic 70's Pioneer Receiver/Turntable w/conical stylus and CV Speakers) allowed the crappy mastering/production to be played loud without regard to fidelity. The way the artist intended it to be played if you will.
So in the end, I split my collection between the Main system and Garage system based on quality of mastering/production. That solved it all for me.
As far as I'm concerned, not all artist have control of the end result. So we have to be at the mercy of the Record Executives and the amount of time they choose to spend on quality mastering. All we can do is listen in the best way we can.
NOTE: This is all based on records that have no serious damage to them. Those records don't stand a chance staying in my collection. This is based on records that have no damage but the recording itself is "meh".
I had a similar experience as I climbed up the ladder. Some recordings really started to show their shortcomings. It got to a point where I had to do like others did and started culling out record albums that didn't give me the listening experience I was after. I was honestly upset about it for a few months, inevitably chasing a dream that all my recordings will sound excellent. I had zero success trying to balance it all.
The success I did have was placing all the culled record albums into a box and relegated them to the garage system, where I actually do more listening (not critical, eye's closed euphoria listening but getting lost in the music and my work). Here I found out that it wasn't my system after all. It was the music production itself. My garage system (basic 70's Pioneer Receiver/Turntable w/conical stylus and CV Speakers) allowed the crappy mastering/production to be played loud without regard to fidelity. The way the artist intended it to be played if you will.
So in the end, I split my collection between the Main system and Garage system based on quality of mastering/production. That solved it all for me.
As far as I'm concerned, not all artist have control of the end result. So we have to be at the mercy of the Record Executives and the amount of time they choose to spend on quality mastering. All we can do is listen in the best way we can.
NOTE: This is all based on records that have no serious damage to them. Those records don't stand a chance staying in my collection. This is based on records that have no damage but the recording itself is "meh".