It's going to be a little more complicated than that. First the easy stuff:
Installing a 12AX7 or the like in the power amp will be required as you understand. The two halves of that one tube will be the voltage amplifier for each channel. The filament can run on either winding as they are rated for it, but putting it on the 1/2 side makes slightly more sense (balance 3 and 3 as you indicated). This will leave the 6.3V filament in blue for the tuner unused, which you can put in series with the 117V primary winding to buck the voltages down so all of the filaments run at the correct voltage with the modern 122V wall voltage. (You did this on your last Magnavox build.)
Referring to your attached schematic above, you will need plate (R27,28), cathode (R29,30), and feedback (R31,32) resistors as you know. Yes, you will also need grid stopper resistors (where R25,26 are shown), but they will be more like 10K rather than the 220K shown, and you will need to add 470K grid return resistors from the end of those stopper resistors to ground. The junction of the 470K grid return and 10K grid stopper will be the audio input or volume control if desired. This will end up looking a lot like the front end of Dave Gillespie's 8600 amp, shown in the schematic snippet below on the right.
Now, the harder stuff. Below on the left is a snippet of
the .pdf schematic that was attached to post #9 that i will refer to- unfortunately it's part numbers do not align with the version you attached, so you will have to translate. The problem I am seeing is that this "AF AMP" second triode voltage amplifier as designed in the original VM pre-amp has pretty low gain, because of the 1500 ohm cathode resistor (R18), and the 47K plate resistor (R17). It was probably such low gain because the first triode preceding the tone stack has fairly high gain (losing some in the stack), and the two worked together to provide the total voltage gain needed by the overall amplifier. Not a huge problem, we just need to modify the plate and cathode resistor values to increase the gain of this single stage tube, which in itself is pretty easy. The complication that it introduces is that by changing the gain, you are then forced to also change the feedback resistor, to a new value that provides the correct amount of negative feedback that will be required for a stable amplifier of sufficient sensitivity. Not insurmountable, but you will be forced to start with a safe value, then adjust that feedback resistor in final tuning to a level of sensitivity that feels right, and is still stable (not oscillating).
I tend to be in Dave Gillespie's camp when it comes to this part of amp design- build an amplifier with a LOT of (open loop) gain, then tame that back considerably with a lot of negative feedback, which results in wide, flat bandwidth, and low distortion. To that end, I really like the triode gain stage of the 8600 as shown on the right. Notice the plate resistor of 470K is 10 times that of the one on the left. This is a very high fidelity choice providing a very flat linear load line with high gain, but it must be biased up correctly. The cathode resistor will need to be a smaller value for high gain, and while the 820 ohms is not that different from the 1500 on the left, the larger plate resistor will force a much lower bias current, so to get a workable cathode voltage the 150K "cathode pull-up" resistor on the right is used. This is absolutely ingenious, because it allows a smaller cathode resistor by dumping several times more than the bias current down through the cathode resistor, which elevates the cathode voltage to the necessary ~1.2-1.5V, stabilizes the bias current and the cathode voltage despite tube variation, and gives quite excellent performance.
If you like that front end, all we would need to do next is start chewing on a good starting value for the feedback resistor that will put you in a good initial landing zone, and we can walk it in from there. There are other ways to do the front end, lots of ways of increasing gain and setting the bias, and I'm sure others will suggest alternatives. Either way, feedback will need to be tweaked, and I don't think you will be happy with the sensitivity of the amplifier with that original gain stage as designed.
