• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

What to do with Altec 420Y Drivers?

In the distant past i sold a few pair of 420 to fellas in eastern Europe who were getting very satisfying results using them in back loaded horns. JBL 4530 was their inspiration.
Yep, that was my plan...and then my damn curiousity and imagination got involved...again...
I'll probably do a pictorial as I go, cabinet refinish and all. The flimsy wood lattice has got to go, damaged beyond repair and I don't care for the look. Same stuff they used on the Valencia, though!
 
Must be some kind of record...17 year long thread, but glad I ran across it. Here we go...

I picked up a pair of Madrid 872A about three weeks ago, and have become fascinated with this 420 A / Y driver. Bought them to yank the drivers and sell but now I'm off on another WhatTheHellAmIDoing adventure. Once I got them home I could see that the cabinets were in better shape than I thought. Having some skill in audio as well as woodworking, I'm going to Frankenstien these baby's but with all Altec components. I have seen so many comments as to what to do with the 420...use alone, better tweeter, some type of horn. After much reading and watching a vid from the Chicago Horn Loudspeaker guys, this is my direction. I have a line on an inexpensive pair of Mantaray horns (endorsed by Tom & Kwing, the CHL guys) from a pair of Model 14 and just snagged a couple of Santana II xovers cheap on eBay. If it all stacks up and sounds good what I intend to do is craft a matching wood enclosure for the horns, something that will compliment the original cabs.
Only thing I can't decide...I have seen the 420 Bi-flex in a sealed cab (Madrid 872B) and these 872A which have a small vent in the baffle board. May take some experimentation and potentially wasting one baffle board to find out what works best. The guy I bought the xovers from actually has the port tubes from the same Santana II's. But what the hey...

Quite looking forward to any comments / suggestions arising from the resurrection of this thread and / or the 872A's.
I recently switched my 420 and tweeters (2) to a larger enclosure. It sounded much better in it. I think the 872A enclosures were too small to get everything out of the 420.
 
Unfortunately if this works in my room I might be driven to build taller cabinets. Get the driver closer to ear level and add volume for bass response. If that happens I hope it ticks off my wife less than bringing in more speakers.
I've been meaning to flip the baffles on my Santana's, but i tilt them up in the meantime.

I think they would love a bigger cabinet, but honestly I don't know if it's really worth the tradeoff. They sing off my vta st-70, with plenty of bass. While hearing the 29hz they should be able to do would be great, the 9cu' boxes required would be massive. I could add a small sub for far less space and investment.
 
I've been meaning to flip the baffles on my Santana's, but i tilt them up in the meantime.

I think they would love a bigger cabinet, but honestly I don't know if it's really worth the tradeoff. They sing off my vta st-70, with plenty of bass. While hearing the 29hz they should be able to do would be great, the 9cu' boxes required would be massive. I could add a small sub for far less space and investment.
The additional space wasn't all that much... less than twice in internal volume. But my ears picked up a noticeable improvement in the overall sound. I also added a dual L-pad, one for each tweeter, but I doubt if that would have helped the sound. I use no mathematical formulas, oscilliscopes, or for that matter anything other than my ears to judge by. So there might be a placebo at work.
 
So...things are moving right along...

Brought the other 872A in from the warehouse, pulled the 420 and it's in as fine condition as the first one. Both showed some dope migration to the bottom of the cone but not much at all, really, no dripover onto the cone itself. I'm going to remove the tweeter from the second one and re-install both 420's in the cabs for some full range listening as has been suggested many times in this ancient thread.

PIcked up a pair of Santana II xovers really cheap on feeBay, this was exciting as I'm trying to stay with Altec components throughout. They cross at 2500Hz, a bit lower than I wanted (3500Hz has been repeatedly suggested as optimal) but easy to re-do while keeping the Altec mounting frame which also has an L pad. Spoke with the fellow who has the Mantaray horns for sale near me, picking those up next week. I've never heard a Model 14, which they were used in, but they seem to pull high praise for their wide dispersion and smoothness, many have commented that they sound great and have less of a "horn sound"...

One issue I'm putting a lot of thought to, and hope to get some input on, is whether the cabinet should be sealed or ported. It is a rather small cabinet for a 15" driver, though I do have a pair of The Fisher XP10, probably similar cabinet volume and I love them (for what they will do). I like deep, rich bass but if I want to shake the house I have other means. Since I will for sure be replacing the baffle, I'm also considering going with a flush mount front load design for the woofs. Have sat through a few cold ones staring at the cabs trying to imagine a complimentary design for the separate horn cabinet if all works out, something reminiscent of the Model 14 / 19 setup. Won't take much work at all to bring the 872 cabinets back to a beautiful state, should be able to find some nice matching wood for the horn cab. Just not sure how to go on the sealed / ported issue; the 870, 872 A & B all had a vent cut in the baffle, the Santana I had the same components and internal volume but were sealed. One might surmise, since the Santana was the later model, that Altec had decided the 420 worked better in a sealed cab, but who knows?

From all I am reading, I find the Bi-Flex design really fascinating for it's oddity and quirkiness, not to mention the aspect of desirability (and NOT) found on this thread. It was obviously something Altec was rather proud of at the time, judging from the spec sheet I read from that era. They were only used in the least expensive, entry level offerings at the time, but they even promoted them as a way to build up to a better system. The last paragraph on that spec sheet was what hooked me...

"ALTEC BIFLEX speakers have a valuable dual purpose feature. In addition to providing outstanding performance as full range units, they may also serve as fine low frequency reproducers. This versatility makes them ideal as the initial speaker in a high quality music system that may be expanded at a later date into a two-way speaker system with the overall response extended to 22,000Hz. The addition of a suitable ALTEC high-frequency driver unit and associated deviding network are all that is required."

So...here I go...75 or so years later, giving their proposition a try. I had fully intended to yank the 420's and resell them, still might...I certainly didn't need another pair of big boxes in the house, but what the Hey? I paid practically nothing for the 872's so even with the additional parts cost I'm still in a very safe zone. If I like the sound I'll crank up the table saw and get to work on the horn cabs. All Good Clean Fun. Stay tuned, start a new thread when I get my hands on the Mantarays.
 
So...things are moving right along...

Brought the other 872A in from the warehouse, pulled the 420 and it's in as fine condition as the first one. Both showed some dope migration to the bottom of the cone but not much at all, really, no dripover onto the cone itself. I'm going to remove the tweeter from the second one and re-install both 420's in the cabs for some full range listening as has been suggested many times in this ancient thread.

PIcked up a pair of Santana II xovers really cheap on feeBay, this was exciting as I'm trying to stay with Altec components throughout. They cross at 2500Hz, a bit lower than I wanted (3500Hz has been repeatedly suggested as optimal) but easy to re-do while keeping the Altec mounting frame which also has an L pad. Spoke with the fellow who has the Mantaray horns for sale near me, picking those up next week. I've never heard a Model 14, which they were used in, but they seem to pull high praise for their wide dispersion and smoothness, many have commented that they sound great and have less of a "horn sound"...

One issue I'm putting a lot of thought to, and hope to get some input on, is whether the cabinet should be sealed or ported. It is a rather small cabinet for a 15" driver, though I do have a pair of The Fisher XP10, probably similar cabinet volume and I love them (for what they will do). I like deep, rich bass but if I want to shake the house I have other means. Since I will for sure be replacing the baffle, I'm also considering going with a flush mount front load design for the woofs. Have sat through a few cold ones staring at the cabs trying to imagine a complimentary design for the separate horn cabinet if all works out, something reminiscent of the Model 14 / 19 setup. Won't take much work at all to bring the 872 cabinets back to a beautiful state, should be able to find some nice matching wood for the horn cab. Just not sure how to go on the sealed / ported issue; the 870, 872 A & B all had a vent cut in the baffle, the Santana I had the same components and internal volume but were sealed. One might surmise, since the Santana was the later model, that Altec had decided the 420 worked better in a sealed cab, but who knows?

From all I am reading, I find the Bi-Flex design really fascinating for it's oddity and quirkiness, not to mention the aspect of desirability (and NOT) found on this thread. It was obviously something Altec was rather proud of at the time, judging from the spec sheet I read from that era. They were only used in the least expensive, entry level offerings at the time, but they even promoted them as a way to build up to a better system. The last paragraph on that spec sheet was what hooked me...

"ALTEC BIFLEX speakers have a valuable dual purpose feature. In addition to providing outstanding performance as full range units, they may also serve as fine low frequency reproducers. This versatility makes them ideal as the initial speaker in a high quality music system that may be expanded at a later date into a two-way speaker system with the overall response extended to 22,000Hz. The addition of a suitable ALTEC high-frequency driver unit and associated deviding network are all that is required."

So...here I go...75 or so years later, giving their proposition a try. I had fully intended to yank the 420's and resell them, still might...I certainly didn't need another pair of big boxes in the house, but what the Hey? I paid practically nothing for the 872's so even with the additional parts cost I'm still in a very safe zone. If I like the sound I'll crank up the table saw and get to work on the horn cabs. All Good Clean Fun. Stay tuned, start a new thread when I get my hands on the Mantarays.
Have fun with it. I certainly did with mine. Now I will try to sell the 872 cabinets and see what happens.
 
Back
Top Bottom