Jaguar I would love to see a nudie of your dome RCA..am I allowed to say that here?
I disagree. Capacitors can often drift in value and increase in ESR as they age, however they will continue to 'work' in the circuit. Accordingly, the equipment, whilst still functional, will not performing as designed. Assuming that a capacitor is working fine unless it has leaked, exploded or shorted out is incorrect.
I can completely understand why some people are shocked at the sound post-recap, but all you're hearing is the sound of the equipment as originally designed. We get used to the warmer, woolier sound, with somewhat subdued treble and the resulting forward midrange. When the full sonic capabilities of the equipment are restored following the recap, the sound is no doubt different.
However, I'm a firm believer that the new capacitors aren't departing from what the designer originally intended back in the day. Circuit topology plays the predominant role in the sound of gear, not the capacitors.
If people prefer the sound of unrestored amps, then it's a personal choice.
Each to their own anyway - different strokes for different folks![]()
Why stop at caps? Why not strip the board and use ALL new components...Under your theory, it should be better than original spec..I mean where do u draw the line?
I don't think that sound is as it originally was by doing a recap..what about resistors? other components drift too...Just changing electrolytics, IMHO, rarely makes sense unless they are bad....just my opinion but I can count on one hand the number of Japanese caps that have gone bad on me..and I have some gear over fifty years old...still rockin...no reason for the caps to HAVE to give out...I think most people fool themselves on the sound they hear after recapping...it's like, what are they going to say? They f'ed up?....love your thoughts....some very wise folks here...and yes, I do love some modern gear!
As for topology, that may be true for a component taken in isolation. Put it into a receiver with still 90% original components and the symbiotic relationship of the originals will be lost...again, just what I have noticed..
Why stop at caps? Why not strip the board and use ALL new components...Under your theory, it should be better than original spec..I mean where do u draw the line?
i personally think that the "re-cap" it all is up there with 1,000 dollar interconnects!
Was waiting for Conrad to weigh in..the binary approach I like....if it ain't bad, don't mess with it
Jesus H. Christ.
![]()
Sounds like a bad cap or two..In all I have over sixty units now, most in various states of disrepair...Perhaps fifteen are running
Some of you may know that I have a weakness for vintage stereo receivers, particularly Technics, Sony, Pioneer and Kenwood....In all I have over sixty units now, most in various states of disrepair...Perhaps fifteen are running now and I cycle them through and "blow the carburetor" out on all of them once in awhile to keep em thumpin. What I rarely do, however is recap. And I should add the average age of my typical receiver is approaching 40 years of age.
I don't recap for several reasons...First, I am a firm believer in the synergy of having all components mature together. I remember about five years ago I came into a beautiful Sony STR-6036A, an amazing unit whose output far exceeded the sticker 15 watts. Anyway, I had joined another forum and the consensus seemed to be that anything and everything should be recapped willy nilly if over thirty years old...wow! How exciting! I was gonna have a chance to have at all my gear and recap til the cows came home. I started with the Sony....my beautiful classic Sony. I gathered the caps and one fine day I popped on my apron, wielded the desoldering iron and, in three hours, changed out every electrolytic on the boards...
Sadly, when I brought the unit up slowly on the variac I was shocked at how the tone had changed! About 20% of the midrange just disappeared! I could have cried...hell, I think I did cry! And you know the saddest part is that there was nothing wrong with the caps I changed out...not a one of them...Sony used great stuff and those were the days when caps were quality, quality, quality.
You know my bottom line is that electronic gear acquires an audio patina just like fine furniture, beautiful coins, and antiques in general....Finagling with replacing components just because they may have some age is just senseless...look at them first...really look at them...I can guarantee you that 95% + of them will look great, if not all...
My Sony never sounded the same again but I never had another recap festival again..and all my equipment has held up beautifully! Just because you have a nice piece of vintage gear does not mean it should be recapped....the old saying that to a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail, is very appropriate here...to an audiophile with the recapping urge, everything looks like a chance to use the desoldering and soldering iron...I encourage you to resist the urge...once the patina of sound is gone, it can not be brought back...
In closing I should mention that I have done plenty of repair jobs for people who recapped units only to have trimmed leads carelessly fall down into the unit and short out components on the board...be careful, use a variac, and check after every changeout...you won't have the woe is me..what did I do wrong regrets...
Just my two cents....love to hear yours and Happy New Year!
Rosie![]()
Yes I have, and personally, I'd rather discuss that than this capacitor bullshit any day.Have you ever seen the page where some people analyzed that photo and figured out not only where it was taken, but exactly when? Kinda cool, but OCD to the max.
Allow me to respectfully state that you don't know what the **** you're talking about.i personally think that the "re-cap" it all is up there with 1,000 dollar interconnects!