I finished up the ESS AMT1 speakers last week and they turned out pretty nice. I think they are going to match up EXTREMELY WELL with this 2325.
@Steven Tate , many thanks for the guidance throughout this process. Also, to
@hirscwi for his cheat sheet.
I don't know what the issue was with the output from the preamp. I took it all apart, cleaned everything again, and started tracing... half way through tracing, the problem resolved itself. One of my 'scope probes gave me problems for about 5 minutes but sorted itself out when I swapped inputs on the 465B (not the first occurrence of the issue). When I had it sorted, I started poking around again for signal and all of the sudden, everything was nice and balanced! I can't, for the life of me, figure out what I did that would have fixed the imbalance issue. I cleaned the volume pot again, but based on the prior symptoms, I really don't think it was a dirty pot.
Over 2 hours of run time later, it hasn't gone out of whack again. It was interesting, though, that the bias and offset were off even though I hadn't really done anything other than the spec adjustments to the phono preamp. It doesn't make sense to me that those adjustments would affect the bias or DC offset.
Whatever it was, I'm not going to complain. As they say, this restoration has been real, and this has been fun, but I wouldn't say it has been
real fun. I am happy to be done with it and have my bench open again for my own projects. (LOL just kidding. I have a stack of stuff to get to. Funny how everyone has something that needs a look once they hear you can fix this stuff.....

)
Anyway, this this 2325 sounds really, REALLY good.
Right away.
That hasn't been my experience with past marantz restorations (2330B, 1060) which took a little while to "break in" before they sounded their best. It has a warm sound but has as much rhythm, pace, and timing as you could want. It's rich without being syrupy. Mellow, but not boring or lazy. My personal opinion has always been that the marantz sound is towards the "sleepy" side of things. Not so, this! But neither is it fatigue inducing (like the Musical Fidelity A300 [seen below the marantz] can be with certain speaker/source combos). The phono stage is a little rolled off with this AT LP-120 I have in for a repair and some upgrades, but that could be the deck, or the cables, which are crap (part of the repair/upgrade) and probably fairly high capacitance. We'll see how it sounds hooked up to my Thorens over the next few days. My understanding is that the Marantz phono stage in here is nearly identical to the phono stage in the 2330B and the 1060, as well, so I wouldn't expect there to be a significant difference in overall sound/tone character. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
The FM reception and sound is pretty impressive, though it can't hold a candle to my Fisher FM-100-B. It's as good as 99.9% of people would ever want, and I wouldn't notice the different between it an my tube unit if I didn't do a LOT of radio listening. FM muting works perfectly. It'll find stereo for probably 75% of the stations that the Fisher finds, which is saying something, because that pulls in CRAZY distant signals really well. Haven't tried the AM side of things because there's really no AM that I care to listen to around these parts. AUX seems to work perfectly with the Oppo player I have, and I haven't yet tried the tape loops, which is something I DO need to do.
Yes, I realize it doesn't hurt that it's pushing some gussied-up KLH sixes... they tend to make everything sound good. But regardless, it sounds great, and with the ESS AMT1 speakers leaning slightly towards the brighter side, and this 2325 having boat loads of power to push them, I think my buddy is going to really like the combo.
Anyway, many many thanks to, well, really ALL of the AK community for help, inspiration, and encouragement. To those who have helped, I am in your debt and should you ever find yourself in Cincinnati, don't hesitate to message me. I'll buy ya a beer.
