I can hardly wait, but I just don't have the time to do it properly right now (nor the space).
I love the styling on those (pre)ESPRIT components. Too bad the hue is somewhat different among the pre and poweramps.
As you say, timeless stuff, just like Yamaha (how I love to have a CT-1010 and CA-1010, they look SO good, and a C-1/B-1). No frills, clean cut, awesome
My emphasis,when prioritising what I want from a component is sound quality.I often said that if a component looked like a dog turd with knobs on it,but sounded like the angels singing,I'd buy it(and love it).
The Yamahas and Sonys that we are both aware of,managed to combine visual styling with great sound quality.The best of both worlds.Have your cake,and eat it. :thmbsp:
My new L-1000Ms,by comparison have(by my impression)'odd' styling.Just 'strange'.Yet they sound beautiful.So I'm happy.
Active operation gives one the ability to use am amp which may have a strength in a particular part of the sonic spectrum(think: the Kenwood Basic M2's bass)in that portion of the spectrum exclusively.
I've found that it puts a lot of pressure upon the preamp to perform,and not be the weakest-link(and they most usually are,after the Source component).
An active loudspeaker system throws a spotlight and a microscopic scrutiny upon the preceding components.Which is wonderful when everything is optimised,however things really need to be optimised.
For example,going active puts pressure upon the preamp,so you get a better preamp.That throws a spotlight upon(let's say) the phono stage,so you get a better phono stage.The purchase of the better phono stage throws a spotlight upon the cartridge,naturally a better cartridge is called-for.What does buying a better cartridge do?
Throws a spotlight upon the turntable..
All the while as you improve something 'downstream',the 'upstream' components are thrown into great exposure.
Be prepared for this when you go active..... :scratch2:.
Sometimes it may be better to start at the Source,and work your way 'downstream'.
I was thinking of putting a $2500 cartridge on my Yamaha PX-2.Instead I bought the GT 2000(for about the same outlay).When I put my Dynavector Karat onto the GT 2000(the cartridge I was going to upgrade from....)and heard just how much of it's ability that the PX-2 wasn't able to expose,I realised that the $2500 cartridge would have been completely wasted on the PX-2.
It is indeed sensible to have a spread of ability across all the components.If I had to go for a component which had the 'strength' in the system,it would have to be the Source component.
The better the 'strengths' are in the other components,the more exposed that the Source stands.
I'm only telling you this because going active throws a spotlight upon what is going-on 'upstream'.....
Good Luck friend. :thmbsp: