whoaru99
Epic Member
Would be interested in hearing your theory why that is.
I'd suggest there is no such a thing as a nuisance GFI trip. Unless the presumption is GFI itself is defective, which we know in this case isn't the case, it is detecting leakage in excess of the threshold therefore doing exactly what it is supposed to do. I understand frequent GFI trips would be a nuisance but that's a secondary matter.
Again, if the guy wants to do it, it shouldn't hurt anything but it comes across to me it worked for a long time just as it is. Something has changed downstream of the GFI. Whatever "something" is is what needs to be fixed.
I'd suggest there is no such a thing as a nuisance GFI trip. Unless the presumption is GFI itself is defective, which we know in this case isn't the case, it is detecting leakage in excess of the threshold therefore doing exactly what it is supposed to do. I understand frequent GFI trips would be a nuisance but that's a secondary matter.
Again, if the guy wants to do it, it shouldn't hurt anything but it comes across to me it worked for a long time just as it is. Something has changed downstream of the GFI. Whatever "something" is is what needs to be fixed.
Last edited: