• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Are streaming services sucking the life out of musical choices?

I think streaming is great... How could it not be with so many choice of music at your fingertips? It isn't really all that attractive to me though as I love the hunt for the physical stuff (I like the covers, liner notes, etc). I tend to buy cheaper and in greater volume too (when I don't just get a pile of CDs for free), so I at any given time I have lots of music to sort through. That means that I don't really need streaming too as I've already got more than enough music to listen to, new and old stuff (new and old to me anyway) and I really don't even spend that many hours a day listening to music anyway. I'm kind of already overwhelmed by streaming TV (and I've started to spend more of my time reading these days, rather than sitting in front of the TV). I get why it's a great option though...
 
I do it a variety of ways:

  • Pick one cut at a time
  • Pick a bunch at a time
  • Use one of the 200 or so playlists I've made
  • Pick one album at a time
  • Use one of the streaming service playlists
  • Use one of the streaming service stations
I do have 2 playlists that are constantly changing for parties, camping, the beach etc. The other is for no cell service airplane, down in a ship working, that is downloaded on my phone.

I listen everyway except tape now.
 
I have a variety of playlist "types" that I've made, some with as few as 20 cuts or so, and some with at many as 500.

  • My version of "best of" for performers that I especially like; multiple genres
  • My version of "boxed sets"for various genres that I especially enjoy (cool jazz, mainstream jazz, baroque, symphonic, opera, folk/Americana, acoustic blues, etc etc etc)
  • Music history playlists, showing the progression of various genres and sub-genres
  • "Mood" playlists (morning, party, work out, driving, late night, drinks and dinner, etc etc)
  • Running playlists of "discovery favorites". I start a new one of these every month or so, adding any new song I hear that sounds good to me. Then I go back and listen a few times, and do a deeper dive on performers/performances that I especially like.

I usually run playlists in shuffle mode, unless they've been built to a specific order (like the music history ones).
 
Last edited:
I have a variety of playlist "types" that I've made, some with as few as 20 cuts or so, and some with at many as 500.

  • My version of "best of" for performers that I especially like; multiple genres
  • My version of "boxed sets"for various genres that I especially enjoy (cool jazz, mainstream jazz, baroque, symphonic, opera, folk/Americana, acoustic blues, etc etc etc)
  • Music history playlists, showing the progression of various genres and sub-genres
  • "Mood" playlists (morning, party, work out, driving, late night, drinks and dinner, etc etc)
  • Running playlists of "discovery favorites". I start a new one of these every month or so, adding any new song I hear that sounds good to me. Then I go back and listen a few times, and do a deeper dive on performers/performances that I especially like.

I usually run playlists in shuffle mode, unless they've been built to a specific order (like the music
Barry White playlist for, you know?
 
To the original question… no.

People putting on the same auto playlists are the same people that sat and listened to the same ten songs over and over on pop radio. For music fans, streaming has opened up a world of music choices. No one here has 100 million songs available at home, so the music choice is much larger for music fans via streaming if they are willing to look for it. As was mentioned, plenty of duds in this library, but that can be said about most libraries. My favorite artist has a song called “Mamma will bark” and I have it in my collection, so they can’t all be winners. Just more to choose from.

I still have records, SACDs, CDs, etc. so I am not anti-physical media. I just think there is more variety available on streaming services.
 
I spent the better part of 1999-2005, digitizing my collection of 5-6,000 CDs and 300 LPs, which I sold or gave away when I had to move from Ann Arbor, MI to Philadelphia in 2006. for much of the '00's, I made mix CDs or playlists on my iPod, but as I transitioned into middle age, I began to get bored with music and started to become that guy who only listened to the music of his salad days, which for me, was between '83-'99. when Spotify debuted, I mostly used it to listen to music I already knew and found it limiting; I was too cheap to subscribe and loathed the ads and ultimately, I lost interest, both with the service and music in general. About 4-1/2 years ago, I had a workplace accident and partially severed the distal digit of the middle finger on my left hand; I was a guitarist in my youth and began to obsess that I'd never play guitar again. Ultimately, I did start playing and with that renewed energy in making music, came an equally revitalized interest in listening to music.

My partner gave me an Apple Music subscription and at first, I used it like I'd used Spotify: I listened to stuff I already knew. Eventually, I started listening to their curated playlists for a given band, their "essentials". Some artists also had "Influences" playlists of bands that inspired them, as well as "Influenced by" playlists, of bands that took their example and expanded on it. This led to an explosion of new music, as did their algorithms that put together artist radio stations after the selected material has played. (I understand other streaming services do this as well). At any rate, I find that at 52, I'm as stoked abut new music as I have been in years, and streaming has a lot to do with it. It's indirectly led to me building another hi-fi system and because of that, I'm also buying records again, too. Saying that streaming services are sucking the life out of musical choices is a facile and fallacious suggestion. Have you listened to commercial radio in the past 20 years?
 
I've said it before - I like to kick back in my spare time and go through Mojo magazine to see what's new and seach Qobuz to have a listen, or sometimes just check the New Releases listings directly on Qoboz - I can click and listen to anything that intrigues me there. I don't use playlists. Heck, they had a HiRes NRPS live album last week I enjoyed.

But, I will offer up one service I donate to annually, and listen to a couple times a month - Radio Paradise. https://radioparadise.com/home
They curate 4 streams of music 24/7 and I can often hear something interesting in one of them. (Main Mix, Mellow Mix, Rock Mix and Global Mix)
Reminds me of the campus radio stations I listened to in the 70s and 80s, but updated.

Financial supporter and dedicated listener to Radio Paradise here too!

I am a Tidal subscriber, and don't really pay attention to "Recommended for You". I know what I'm looking for, and rarely do I not find what I'm searching for.
 

That was directed at the OP.

The whole post (vs the edited one, above) makes that clear, as it references his earlier comments.
 
Last edited:
My favorite artist has a song called “Mamma will bark” and I have it in my collection, so they can’t all be winners

Mr Sinatra was broke when he recorded that with Dagmar and he needed the bread, Pallie. He despised that song. He also hated "Strangers In The Night".
 
The biggest mistake the OP made was reading anything from The Guardian.

I have had Spotify Premium since 2016 and cannot imagine not using it. The people in the article are the usual whining ninnies that love to bitch about the stupidest things. It was and is pure clickbait. Nobody really cares that a few boobs have decided not use an easily disable feature of any service. But the usual superior attitude of those who decide such a thing is actually pretty fun to scorn as shown in this classic article from The Onion: They are the same people that sneer and bitch about streaming.

https://www.theonion.com/area-man-constantly-mentioning-he-doesnt-own-a-televisi-1819565469

"CHAPEL HILL, NC–Area resident Jonathan Green does not own a television, a fact he repeatedly points out to friends, family, and coworkers–as well as to his mailman, neighborhood convenience-store clerks, and the man who cleans the hallways in his apartment building."

"I, personally, would rather spend my time doing something useful than watch television," Green told a random woman Monday at the Suds 'N' Duds Laundromat, noticing the establishment's wall-mounted TV. "I don't even own one.""

"
According to Melinda Elkins, a coworker of Green's at The Frame Job, a Chapel Hill picture-frame shop, Green steers the conversation toward television whenever possible, just so he can mention not owning one.

"A few days ago, [store manager] Annette [Haig] was saying her new contacts were bothering her," Elkins said. "The second she said that, I knew Jonathan would pounce. He was like, 'I didn't know you had contacts, Annette. Are your eyes bad? That a shame. I'm really lucky to have almost perfect vision. I'm guessing it's because I don't watch TV. In fact, I don't even own one."

According to Elkins, "idiot box" is Green's favorite derogatory term for television.

"He uses that one a lot," she said. "But he's got other ones, too, like 'boob tube' and 'electronic babysitter.'"

Elkins said Green always makes sure to read the copies of Entertainment Weekly and People lying around the shop's break room, "just so he can point out all the stars and shows he's never heard of."

"Last week, in one of the magazines, there was a picture of Calista Flockhart," Elkins said, "and Jonathan announced, 'I have absolutely no idea who this woman is. Calista who? Am I supposed to have heard of her? I'm sorry, but I haven't.'"

Tony Gerela, who lives in the apartment directly below Green's and occasionally chats with the 37-year-old by the mailboxes, is well aware of his neighbor's disdain for television.

"About a week after I met him, we were talking, and I made some kind of Simpsons reference," Gerela said. "He asked me what I was talking about, and when I told him it was from a TV show, he just went off, saying how the last show he watched was some episode of Cheers, and even then, he could only watch for about two minutes before having to shut it off because it insulted his intelligence so terribly."

Added Gerela: "Once, I made the mistake of saying I saw something on the news, and he started in with, 'Saw the news? I don't know about you, but I read the news."

Green has lived without television since 1989, when his then-girlfriend moved out and took her set with her.

"When Claudia went, the TV went with her," Green said. "But instead of just going out and buying another one–which I certainly could have afforded, that wasn't the issue–I decided to stand up to the glass teat."

"I'm not an elitist," Green said. "It's just that I'd much rather sculpt or write in my journal or read Proust than sit there passively staring at some phosphorescent screen."

"If I need a fix of passive audio-visual stimulation, I'll go to catch a Bergman or Truffaut film down at the university," Green said. "I certainly wouldn't waste my time watching the so-called Learning Channel or, God forbid, any of the mind sewage the major networks pump out."

Continued Green: "People don't realize just how much time their TV-watching habit–or, shall I say, addiction–eats up. Four hours of television a day, over the course of a month, adds up to 120 hours. That's five entire days! Why not spend that time living your own life, instead of watching fictional people live theirs? I can't begin to tell you how happy I am not to own a television.""
 
The biggest mistake the OP made was reading anything from The Guardian.

If you say so. Whilst its articles vary in quality, as they come from a variety of sources (a good thing), it's one of the better UK papers. Certainly better than most of the redtops, the Heil and the Torygraph. But we'd better stop there, or we'll hit a moderation redline.
 
Where did the article find these people? The barista who "uses" music? The one who wants the experience to be more "home-based?" This is where the therapist says it's time to evaluate relationships.

As for me, streaming has expanded on the music I know, and opened me up to new things. Qobuz is great for that because I get their emails every week about new releases - it's like the Criterion Channel of music. Pandora kind of is, but once they introduce a new thing to your channel, they beat you over the head with it over and over again so the experience gets stagnant - although it could just be my channels, since one is admittedly limited.

But I stream two different ways: Pandora for mindless wallpaper, Qobuz or Deezer for when I'm in the market for something specific or get an email with something that catches my interest. Albums only; no playlists.
 
I subscribe to Apple Music and have millions of choices. Before that, I was limited to whatever I owned on physical media or purchased/downloaded.
 
It's a good read and fairly short.

This is one of the silliest, one-sided articles about streaming I have ever read. They only interviewed folks that had quit streaming for whatever reasons, but now they ALL get more enjoyment from music. Sheesh! Such trash journalism.
 
This is one of the silliest, one-sided articles about streaming I have ever read. They only interviewed folks that had quit streaming for whatever reasons, but now they ALL get more enjoyment from music. Sheesh! Such trash journalism.

Yup, classic Guardian. It is total bullshit. A classic straw man article.
 
Back
Top Bottom