• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Bose 601 "owner" opinions please

First, Ron, that's pretty awesome. Go ahead and post that RS model number one day when you aren't busy so that we'll have that info. I seem to recall someone having a hard time getting the correct woofers for a pair. That'd be great, just whenever you aren't busy repairing roofs and such, lol.

Secondly, ORIGINAL surrounds, centsless?? Wow. How many pair of 601 III's have BEEN thru your stable?? That's pretty fascinating. Did they seem different in any way? Curious.
 
First, Ron, that's pretty awesome. Go ahead and post that RS model number one day when you aren't busy so that we'll have that info. I seem to recall someone having a hard time getting the correct woofers for a pair. That'd be great, just whenever you aren't busy repairing roofs and such, lol.

Secondly, ORIGINAL surrounds, centsless?? Wow. How many pair of 601 III's have BEEN thru your stable?? That's pretty fascinating. Did they seem different in any way? Curious.

Hi....not any different....just mint. I have had six or so sets come thru here. The bass was deeper and more pronounced with the music. I was startled at the difference.
 
Y
Series 1----quite good, nice bass and warm highs
Series 2----very good, very nice bass and clean sparkling highs
Series 3----good, nice bass but generally not as nice sounding as the first two series
Series 4----not very good at all, compressed bass and muddy mids and highs

All of this of course my personal opinion and experience.....:smoke:
Yes,except the 901,other model series ii/iii are best,better driver and cabinet maybe.I always find their driver drom the first two or three series.
 
I moved mine to a different amp and the bass became bloated. I'll be rearranging the man cave, yet again, and hook them up to a "brighter" receiver. They still amaze me with the bass they produce. Very good imaging and stage. I'm always looking for a good pair to restore.
 
LIstened to a pair of 601 series III tonight. Quite liked the sound. I wish I could hear them in my room, I fear the drivers pointed all over the place is going to lead to some pretty whacky reflections and whatnot (I have a lot of big windows going on in there).
 
I moved mine.....right out the door. Got offered a fair price for them, and decided to sell.

Miss them already, but I have better speakers to listen to, honestly. Decisions, decisions...
 
I found this old thread looking for help on a newly bought used set of Bose 601 Series II from 1981. Since many in this thread is familiar with these speakers this might be a good place to seek help. First, I need to say, that I now very little about tech - wiring, watts, amps, what fit together and why.

First thing I did was connecting them to a maybe 10 year old Marantz SR4200 surround receiver - the front speaker connections. The sound I got can best be described as a "flat sound without bass" like the sound coming from external pc-speakers before they came with woofers etc. I pulled of the grill - all tweeters and woofers (and foam) seem intact. Sound is coming from the woofers, but they're moving VERY little. Turning the volume up didn't make it better, just louder. There's no distortion as far as I can tell. I connected the speakers to a Marantz 2215B receiver from 1976. Same result.

Shouldn't a Marantz SR4200 be able to "power" those old Bose speakers?
Shouldn't those Bose sound at least just OK with ok bass, treble etc. (without doing any settings on the receiver)?
Does the above to you sound as to broken speakers or ?

Specs:
Marantz SR4200: https://www.cnet.com/products/marantz-sr4200/specs/
Bose 601 SII: http://www.audiolabga.com/pdf/BOSE601II.pdf

And another thing:
Will a Marantz 2215B be able to play on a pair of Bose 601 SII-speakers?
2215B has 15 watts output and the Bose-speakers "recommend" 20 watts minimum. Logic tells me, that it won't work, since 15 is lower than 20 :-) But from reading online I get the impression, that that is not how to rule out that the units will work together. I'm in no need of blasting off the roof, but I like to fill the living room with a folk-record at a volume level, that will win over the db of two kids playing and a dishwasher running.

Any advice would be helpful!
 
OK, you've basically identified the main problem and that is lack of power, or really more specifically "headroom". A receiver/amplifier must have headroom to respond to transients, or "peaks" in the music material, like the crash of cymbals or canon fire in the 1812 overture. Your receiver is just trying to "keep up" so to speak. Another element, that you might be referring to is impedance. Thankfully in the case of the 601 II they're "nominal" impedance is 8-ohms. This is OK for most receivers and amplifiers. However, again, the nominal is like an average as speakers CAN fluctuate in impedance, going up or down, but usually down (smaller value). When it goes down that puts an extra load on the amp section. Half the impedance doubles the power requirement, or demands if you will. I've used a 60w amp with mine and it gets them cranking loud, and clear. So you will need to up the power. Also, you may want to check ALL the wiring. These bloody Bose speakers (many of them) used solid core wire, which eventually breaks. I had to repair several wires on one speaker and one on the other, if I recall correctly. I don't believe caps are an issue since they are not electrolytic, again that I recall. Still have mine. I have another post with my rebuild of mine. They were quite a mess when I got them and one of the woofers had been swapped out.
 
Thanks for your answer, Copa1934, I appreciate it!

Let me get one thing straight first: Shouldn't the Marantz SR4200 with it's 70 watts in output be able to power those Bose (giving their range from 20 - 150 wats) ?
 
One would think so. I'd check all the connections on the drivers (tweeters and woofers) and the crossover. If you have the "lamps" on the crossover (if equipped) you might have a bad element.
 
Reposted from the 'Seventies Stereo website, (thank you, Lloyd!) where I posted this in 2011:

Hello, I would agree with you about the later products and the company's marketing practices. But right now I'm listening to a pair of Bose 601, Series 1 speakers from 1978 and they are terrific! I pulled them out of a dumpster and repaired some cabinet damage and refoamed the four 8" woofers. They have the same high build quality as the other speakers from this period that we know and love. Heavy-duty construction, beautiful wood veneers, all of that. In my small crowded apartment (record shelves everywhere!), the multi-directional tweeter array provides an unequaled sense of air and dynamics from anywhere in the room. They are definitely not sit-in-one-spot 'imaging' speakers. But as far as creating a great sense of 'feel' for the music, they have for me been a very satisfying experience. The later series 3 versions are probably even better in the area of openness, since they lack the cabinet structure surrounding the tweeters. The Series 1 models are among the earliest Bose products made, and like many other manufacturers, a cut-off date in the early Eighties must be applied to the company's products. Bose just sank a little further than most. By the way, these are hooked up to a Pioneer SX-1050 receiver and a mint AR-XA turntable, both of which were also found in the trash! The Pioneer needed a switch replaced and the AR got a new AT-95 cartridge and careful set-up, but that's it. Is this the ultimate low cost heavy rocking 70's system? One album side later, I have my answer....

2017 Update:
After 5 or more years of not playing these, I dug them out and hooked them up again. Same Pioneer SX- 1050 receiver as before. YESSSS! Great! Loving the wide, wild presentation they throw out for the whole place to enjoy. And they have a great and full frequency response. Enough bass to cause the neighbors to complain the day after a great late night listening session... My room is a chaotic workshop with my big desk off to one side and stuff (lots of other speakers) everywhere. Major Mancave! They are located at one end of the mess, which opens up to the foyer and another room just beyond. Lots of space down here. Another pair of speakers at the far end covers the other end, for a 'surround' style presentation that keeps me working late into the night. As you might surmise, these are not being used as an 'imaging' set up that tries to create that 3-D sonic picture so enamored by the average audiophile who needs to see John Coltrane or Jimi Hendrix standing there in front of them down to the inch. Don't get me wrong, I love to have that going on, too, and I do on another set-up in a different room. These Bose will never do that. I don't even know what they will do when set up with the big reflecting concept, needing a big blank wall behind them, to create the reflected concert hall sound that Amar Bose was trying to reproduce at many levels with most of his early speaker designs, (those generally being the ones with '0' (zero) in the middle of their numbers). I just don't have that big and clear of a space to find out about the maximized design set-up that he wanted.. I don't think I will in the near future, either. But I don't really care! The Bose 601's are doing something else that I really need. Filling the space with all kinds of good music! Charles Mingus is blasting away, as I write this! I need to preach for a second against the Blind Bose Bashers, for whom I have limited patience. The online forums on this are really tedious and a waste of time. But at the risk of joining in to their useless exchange, I must throw in my two cents worth out there. Bose speakers, and I mean only the early group that were well made, and the ones I have mentioned (301 up to 901, in their various incarnations) can do things that lots of other speakers will struggle to accomplish. They all will give a satisfying listening experience which (unfortunately) seems to depend on preconceived expectations according to the 'Gospel' of Stereo Listening. These early designs tried to do things that few or no other speaker designs attempted. Mr Bose was an iconoclastic genius when it came to the concepts of the audio reproduction experience. Later incarnations of the company he created did not fulfill the high standards he sought. It is understandable, since dozens of innovative speaker designers and companies have fallen by the wayside or disappeared without a trace. Many of Mr Bose's designs did actually make it to the mainstream. This is the very source of the reputation that was later squandered by the later denigrated designs that were mostly exercises in marketing to the mass market that had money to spend. It's a marketing issue, more than a conceptual issue, in my book, and I really don't want to go any farther than that. I think my Bose 601's do something special and wonderful in the environment in which I have had the opportunity to use them. They are doing something great that I need. They will never do something that suits the 'conventional wisdom' of the Bose Bashers. OK, whatever. All of Amar Bose's early designs have great and unconventional merits, which the 'conventional wisdom' seekers will never
be able to appreciate. If you are inclined to sit in one place and never move, seeking a simplified level of musical satisfaction that depends on keeping your ass in a single spot ever and forever, then there is no question that the innovative early Bose designs will confound and frustrate you. But I will suggest that for persons that are not so rigid and ossified in their ideas, who want to move around and not be tied down to some particular spot like those chair-bound so-called audiophiles who find sanction in some stilted positional accuracy created by a sound engineer, and decide to take something else from the music reproduction that gives them new motivational energy and enjoyment, which to me confronts the very fundamental nature of music as an expressive force, I can only say, go ahead and try out any of these early Bose designs, and see what they do for you. I would also say that you have chosen to become part of a greater and more personal relationship with music as a concept, as a concept that enters the being and makes some changes at a deep level. Is this possible under particular circumstances, without a specific and conventional view of how music reproduction is supposed to conduct itself? That's up to YOU, and what recorded music means to you. Those who think recorded music can only be reproduced in a particular way will not agree, and would likely not open themselves to what these early Bose designs try to create. That's fine. There's plenty of places for them to dwell. But if music has a broader and more flexible concept, and is subject to a more active definition which lets the listener experience more than a static single listening spot, I would offer my encouragement to try out some of these early design concepts. But if you require some kind of 'ideal' condition to get some kind of enjoyment or meaning out of the music, then I would definitely suggest that this listener never consider listening to music using these Bose designs, because at their very core, they require a different concept of how a person can enjoy music. And I don't think they will accommodate the 'conventional wisdom' at all well... Good luck and enjoy the music, however you see fit.....
 
Here's my little story. I was at this retirement community and saw they were cleaning out a house. The son was humping from the attic a set of Bose 601s that were filthy, dusty, and looked like driftwood from being exposed to the sun. I asked how much to rid these from you and he said $20. Cleaned them, re foamed all 4 woofers and sanded them and used Howard's Restore a finish and they looked great. Sound wise I liked them and for me power is no problem w/ my Adcom GFA-555. I liked the fact that they are no where as finicky placement wise compared to 901s and that they had this switch on the terminal board called symmetrical for front firing or asymmetrical for the bouncing off the wall all around sound. I don't regret selling them but would take another pair if given. I did like them and found enough bass and the tweeter array was ok. No pix and again not new here just a admin mix up....Lew
 
Just days before moving from Oregon to California I stopped in at Hot Poop (look it up) and he had a pair of beautiful (well dirty), complete and undamaged 601 II speakers. I didn't have room for them. However. I'm headed back in the near future and if he still has them I'm working a deal out, if I can. I'd really love to have a pair again.
 
Hello, Everyone. I have been following this thread for years but finally decided to post some possibly inciteful observations on 2 pair of Bose 601's I've come across... the series II & series III. (And later, the 501 Series IV)

I first came across a set of 601 series III a few years back when a guy wanted me to do some repair work on his vehicle at his house. When I walked up to his front door & knocked, I noticed as he opened up the door a pair of Bose 601's inside (in decent shape cosmetically). As I began repairing his vehicle, I asked him about the speakers. He said they were "just some old speakers and weren't even plugged into the stereo". I offered to do the work in trade for the speakers & he jumped at the offer without hesitation. (If he had hooked them up, I probably would not have them now! ) I took them home later & noticed that all 4 woofers needed to be refoamed. The cabinets had REAL wood veneer that needed cleaning & a light sanding with superfine sandpaper plus an application of Howard's Feed & Wax. Other than that... perfect.
A few months ago, I walked into a local thrift shop & walked up to a MINT pair of 601 series II. The ONLY problem they had was all 4 woofers needed surrounds also. They were marked for $20... EACH. I walked out of there paying $20... for BOTH!

I am now in the process of refoaming all 8 woofers & came across this thread again. Apparently, there is a debate on which series 601 sounds best... Series I, II, or III?? The vastly different physical designs have been noted, but not explained as to actually why Bose changed from series to series. I have some insight here which may help some to understand better why the 601 Series III sounds better & sells for more money on the open market.

The 601 Series I is the shortest version (with probably less internal air space for the woofers than Series II or III, I did not do any calculations/measurements) that uses a vertical round port/tube (which is located right in the middle of the tweeters/mids & upper woofer & causes interference with the mids/highs & "chuffing" when played loud with a good amount of deep bass) & a more "congested"/bulky upper grille area (which also interferes with the sound). (I believe it has a REAL woodgrain veneer, which is good.) Plus, it fires the tweeters/mids (called "twiddlers" by Bose) at a very low level, not ear level, which will most likely negatively affect the sound (stands would be needed to correct this).
(Result= a good sounding speaker, just not refined as well as it could have been before being released to the public.)

The 601 Series II was the improved version due to it's taller cabinet (which probably has more internal air space for the woofers, probably allowing them to play deeper bass & places the "twiddlers" at a higher level... closer to ear level for better imaging. (Unfortunately, it had vinyl veneer, not REAL wood veneer like the Series I) The upper grille area was also relieved of some of the bulk & physically opened up a little more in order to get cleaner mids/highs than the previous model. However, the Series II again used the vertical round port/tube placed right in the midst of the "twiddlers" & upper woofer, which causes interference with the mids/highs & "chuffing" when driven hard with deep bass. This vertical round port/tube also blows upward against the cheap plastic-framed grille & grille cloth, which can cause sonic vibrations/rattling of said plastic grille (which, by the way, looks much nicer than the previous series). It's base is also larger than the Series III & takes up more floor space... don't know about the Series I?
(Result= an even better sounding speaker than the previous model due to larger cabinet volume for deeper bass, higher level of "twiddler" placement which improves imaging due to being closer to ear level, & nicer looking grille shape/material. However, Bose unfortunately took a step backwards by NOT using REAL wood veneer like they used on the Series I, and that was such a shame.)

The 601 Series III was the final improved version of this design. It had an even smaller footprint than either of the two previous series (greatly improved the WAF - Wife Acceptancy Factor); it was taller than either series which put the "twiddlers" at proper ear level for the best imaging; it still had a large woofer cabinet volume ( for deeper bass); it no longer had a huge grille on top but instead had a much more sonically transparent, easily removeable, non-vibrating grille; it NO LONGER had a vertical round port/tube (which is probably THE most important & effective improvement yet) but instead a SLOT PORT located on the rear backside bottom of the speaker (which eliminates ANY interference with the mids/highs sound quality & ELIMINATES the chuffing noise PLUS allows speaker placement to use the back wall as a sounding board which can augment the bass even more, if desired/needed in different home's applications. Just research slot ports versus round ports and chuffing. The high-end car audio company, JL Audio, ONLY uses slot ports on ALL of their custom subwoofer boxes... I guess they don't like the chuffing noise either? Even Altec Lansing used slot ports on their 604 cabinets! There is DEFINITELY an advantage of using slot ports over round ports; on the Series III's; Bose even uses slot ports (not round ports/tubes) on other Bose speakers, like the 201, 301, etc...; Bose also went back to using REAL wood veneer on the 601 Series III cabinets... YEAH!!; the Series III also have two different colored grilles... interesting design, but works for most.
(Result= the best sounding series of Bose 601, or for that matter, any other Bose speaker ever made,... period. It had more contemporary design than older series, better sound quality, higher WAF than older series, more power handling than older series (I think? 200 watts versus 150 watts), better imaging, better upper grille design, REAL wood veneer,... Yes, some people think the Series I or Series II are the best, simply because they own them (biased) or because they heard the Series III with cheap equipment, in a room not suited for them (non-reflective walls) or simply placed improperly. But with all factors equal, set up all three series in the same, proper room for them, with higher-end powerful electronics, and the differences between them are obvious. After all, why would Bose, a major manufacturer, change it's manufacturing/tooling process (which is very expensive) if the changes to the speaker were not better than the series before? ** Wait! I know what some of you are thinking... "Well how do you explain Bose changing from the 601 Series III to the 601 Series IV, because it sounds like crap compared to the Series III? That was a move backwards!". Yes, this is correct, but many companies make wrong business decisions to satisfy a certain niche market (in this case, "housewives who don't like/want big floorstanders or even slightly larger bookshelf speakers in their house & they wear the pants in the family").

(Yes, crap happens but sending American jobs overseas & having cheap products sent back is not our own personal faults... darn politics & greed! That's a topic we need not start here. It simple... if we bring back the jobs to the U.S., the quality of products "Made in America" will undoubtedly improve.)

I hope this helps shed a little more light on the subject's of which series sounds better or why the Series III gets all of the glory/attention & commands the highest resale amount of the first three series & basically ANY Bose home speaker. You have to try and picture in your head the Bose speaker design team back them comparing designs of the Series I with the "new & improved" Series II. Then, later, the "updated" Series II with the "new & even more improved" Series III. When the Series III was being developed, they probably even tested all three together! ☺

P.S. To answer another question about 501 replacement woofers. I owned a pair of 501 Series IV which needed new surrounds when I got them (free from some guy who just wanted them out of his attic). I was younger and didn't know how to re-surround speakers yet, so I called Bose & ordered 2 new woofers ($35/each?) & new grilles ($25/each?). When I went to install the new woofers, I installed one in the first cabinet & decided to do an experiment with the other cabinet. I installed a Soundstream SPL10 (a car audio sub) into the other cabinet, just to see how it would sound. The SPL10 (a 10" woofer with a huge magnet compared to the anemic Bose woofer) had dual 4-ohm voice coils while the Bose woofer was a single 8-ohm voice coil. So I wired the SPL10 in series for an equal 8-ohm load, to keep everything as close to the same as possible. When I A/B'd the two cabinets, I was not expecting the SPL10 to have the same sound quality the Bose woofer had... more bass, most likely, but less quality. Man was I wrong! It made a HUGE difference... Cleaner, tighter, deeper bass! I was simply amazed at the difference. I still installed the factory Bose replacements, but have never forgotten how it sounded with the SPL10. A lot has changed in the design of woofers in the past 30-40 years & upgrading to newer, technologically better woofers can greatly improve sound quality & one's listening experiences. Yes, I can hear it now... "If you change woofers, then it's NO LONGER a Bose 501 Series IV!"... and those people are absolutely correct. However, it IS a better sounding version of it. And yes, others are thinking "You have to take in the Theile/Small parameters... measurements... do crossover changes... impedence matching... sensitivity matching... correct for less internal air space due to huge magnet size...blah...blah...blah. I know all of this, as you do, but sometimes ya get lucky and have something on hand that works perfectly to YOUR ears, & isn't that what this "hobby" is all about? OUR own ears, not other people's ears? Yes, in a perfect world we ALL would have been trained in electronics, have the proper testing equipment, have access to whatever drivers we needed, but this is NOT a perfect world and we must try... experiment with different things sometimes... and most importantly, HAVE FUN DOING IT!! I had a blast swapping woofers that day! Hearing the difference in woofers... learning for myself... repairing something that was broken... it's a hobby & hobbies are something to do (which you like or are interested in) for FUN when you are not working or being nagged by someone... it's a getaway from the stresses of daily life. There are no ABSOLUTELY SPECIFIC rules to ANY hobby... if there were, it would feel more like job instead of a hobby. So go do some experimenting... play around with some old equipment... learn how to solder on a cheap, old vintage receiver... get glue all over yourself while resurrounding some woofers... bring back old stereos/speakers from the dead & breathe new life into them... fix some vintage equipment & then give it away to someone who would/might appreciate it (a young kid... older man/woman... someone who only listens to crappy rap music [LMAO!!], whoever you know that has a cheap, "Made in China" stereo...)... live life without always having to be a perfectionist... there is no perfect speaker, no perfect sound... It's all about the music!! After all , the MUSIC is why we love this hobby in the first place!! May all of your music sound good through your equipment to your ears... except rap... everything but rap.
 
I always wonder what it would be like to rebuild from scratch an old, vintage speaker that already sounded very good (like the Bose 601series III) but use all new modern drivers & extremely thick, non-resonating MDF particle board... like 1" or even thicker?! Like one of the guy's here (Sridah or ?) said he wants to do with Infinity Emit tweeters/soft domes/hard domes, etc... . Maybe use Morel woofers? Or even old school woofers from another set of speakers which have cabinets that are toast? Like some Infinity RS6000's that I just parted out. I removed/kept EVERYTHING from the cabs & trashed the cabs due to their extreme water damage/absorption. Now I have four 10" woofers, two Polydome midranges, & two EMIT tweeters to play around with. I have other Infinity speakers (like the 2000A's, CS3006 & the RS4b, a single Kappa 6) which have similar driver set-ups, but have way better cabinetry quality. What I always think about it doing is a DIY with driver's like these but in the design of another speaker, like the 601 Series III. A thick, heavy-duty cabinet without any resonances (maybe with B&W Prism speaker technology inside which eliminates standing waves? Pyramids on the interior walls) with the design of the dual chambered woofers ported into another chamber then slot ported out the bottom rear. Using EMIT tweeters & Polydome midranges (facing the same angles as the Bose) but using four EMIT tweeters & four Polydome midranges for EACH speaker cabinet, instead of only 4 "twiddlers" per speaker cabinet. This way, mids & highs are taken care of by their specific drivers instead of only one "full-range" paper, "twiddler". The EMIT tweeters also play to 45khz!! Way beyond human hearing but it helps in 2nd, 3rd, 4th order harmonics, etc... . Many people complain that Bose uses "cheap", paper drivers but charges an exorbitant amount of money for their speakers, which to them is not justifiable. Well, I'd like to see/hear more expensive, higher-quality drivers perform in their place... just to experiment & see if there is a huge difference in sound quality or not. Infinity used rear facing EMIT tweeters on their Kappa 9's & they sounded phenominal! They also used bipolar ribbons on their 2000A's (which I actually have, thank God!) & they are some of the best speakers I've ever heard. These are not exactly the same angle of reflection that the Bose does, but they are reflecting none the less... more dipole I guess. So Bose's so-called "direct-reflecting technology" has been used (to a degree) by many other companies (including EPI) & with great success, so why can't someone use thicker cabinetry & different drivers to accomplish the same or hopefully better results? Some believe to leave a great speaker alone & I agree, but if you can make a speaker out of old, spare parts & some thicker MDF sound just as good or possibly better than the original... and you are having a blast doing so... then go for it. You will learn things along the journey which you didn't know before & may even be able to share your project with other loved ones who might want to join/help you work on it. (A father/son project... a father/daughter project... a husband/wife project... a grandfather/grandkid project... a neighbor/neighbor project... a friend/friend project... whatever?)

I wish Bose would come out with upgraded direct replacement drivers for these older speakers... like real woofers with butyl rubber surrounds, heavy-duty magnets (neodymium?), cast aluminum frames with sound deadening material applied to the back of them, with the ability to go down to 20hz (or even a little lower?) &, even better, newly upgraded 3" "twiddlers" with a KEF-like UNI-Q tweeter in its center or at least a screw-in metal bullet (like B&W has, but it's in plastic) to hit 20khz+ & maybe use kevlar or something for the midrange cone material? Use high-grade caps/coils/resistors/internal wiring & whatever other crossovers parts are necessary. Real wood veneer would be mandatory. It would look like a Bose 601 Series III, but sound much better & possibly look better, depending on which real wood veneer you used.

Has anyone else had these crazy ideas before or am I the only one?
 
I just swapped my 601-IIs back into my living room system.
They've been idle for 6 months to accommodate a set of Advent and a set of Wharfedale speakers that I found last summer and have been enjoying.

I had forgotten how good these sound.
These 601-IIs are definitely the best speakers I own.
 
Is $400 too much to pay for a pair of S1 Bose 601s? Original owner and in nice shape. Thx!
 

Attachments

  • 00A0A_8gEfOFvsHB2_1200x900.jpg
    00A0A_8gEfOFvsHB2_1200x900.jpg
    101.7 KB · Views: 12
Back
Top Bottom