ToastedMaple
New Member
Best of luck. starting my third and final Series II EQ now. It gets easier.
Nice work! I recapped my Series II and left all else alone. The sound definitely improved, and I eventually plan to recap a Series I and a Series IV. But now this thread is tempting me to go for the full monte on these units.Good Day Fellow AK Members
Recently, Leestereo completed restoration of my Marantz 2270. Success of this project prompted me to revive a project to restore the Equalizer for my beloved 901 Series II. I have three, sets of 901's. Pity me if you must. The active set have the Walnut Facing kit for Series I/II. I'm restoring another set for my daughter.
For context on the restoration, consider the Bose 901 Active Equalizer as a supplement to your existing tone controls. Without any cross-over for the 9 drivers in each channel, it is an essential component of the 901 sound. Now, after 40+ years, the EQ electrolytics are most certainly suspect, but also the many carbon resistors that shape the tone curve will likely have drifted and affected the equalization curve.
With Leestereo’s analysis in hand, I repopulated the board with higher-value electrolytics, film caps and 1% resistors. Some electrolytics were replaced with bipolar film capacitors for better quality audio. New transistors (there are 5 per channel) were selected for low noise and matched for hFE. Phono jacks were upgraded and respected for modern connectors. Tape lop was left intact. The complete parts list is attached with Mouser PN, analysis and recommendations, again, courtesy of Leestereo's deep experience in vintage restoration.
Most of us won’t need the full range of +18dB boost but I have tinnitus and a bit is most welcome. Bass is superb, tight and detailed and getting better, possibly as the caps (in both my 2270 and the EQ) bed in.
This was my first electronics restoration project. It was daunting to depopulate and re-install nearly 100 components. I am very grateful to Leestereo for his advice, enormous patience with a newbie, and support. I learned a lot about restoration and trouble-shooting as well (after I installed the &^*% transistors backwards!).
This board was not unmolested, prior restoration work, and that posed some additional challenges. Pictures attached of original board, intermediate and semi-final project, as well as parts list, noted above.
Please feel free to pose any questions.View attachment 1810657View attachment 1810710View attachment 1810718
Best Regards, DGC
...If you feel that C9 and C49 are fine, then I’ll leave them be. It would be nice to do all of them of course, but I can’t find specifics on what those caps are exactly
View attachment 1995537 View attachment 1995538
Here’s a closeup of the caps in question (both sides)
hi @whoaru99 ... Are you saying C9/C49 are similar to this one:
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/KEMET/C315C680J5G5TA7301?qs=Y/iT2p1OqAtaUpiB7YPESQ==
Are they 50V or 100V? Would you know the % tolerance?

...also, for C10/C2/C12/C50/C42/C52, (all require the same cap specs) we are replacing polarized caps with bipolar ones. I trust y’al know what you’re doing, but just wanted to inquire if that was intentional.