When going to stores that sold Bose and other HiFi equipment back in the '80s and '90s, the sound of other brands were more similar in their presentation where Bose was always different. I guess Klipsch always sounded quite unique as well. Klipsch was kind of 'in your face' while Bose was relaxed. The others seemed to be somewhere in the middle. The first real speakers I ever bought were Klipsch KG 5.5 in either '95 or '96. I was in college, and joyed having 5 girls on campus for every 1 guy and threw a lot of parties. The Klipsch were an obvious choice I thought. Out of the Bose I got to hear, I never enjoyed their Lifestyle systems, but I always thought their regular home speakers sounded nice, but just were what I was looking for. I got to hear everything but the 801. My least favorite Bose were the 501 and the 201. I thought all the larger ones sounded nice though none of them technically dazzling. My buddy had a very wealthy and famous father who built a loft for us to hang out in and bought an all pioneer front end and Bose 601s. Believe or not, those speakers did rather well in a party environment and helped facilitate all sorts of debauchery. I thought my Klipsch would be a world better than the 601 and I was absolutely wrong. The Klipsch had various zones of loudness while the Bose had the room feeling very even. You could dance or talk just about anywhere. With the Klipsch, if you wanted to talk while things were at dance levels, you had to get out of their way and the dance floor had beams of pain from the resonances inside that horn. We ended up partying at his place a lot more than mine even though it was far away from campus. It still worked. There were other advantages of course, but a good bit of the reason, though we never really realized at the time, was actually that the stereo was more pleasant, got loud, but didn't beat you up for it and allowed everyone to socialize.
I own the 201 now--my absolute least favorite normal Bose speaker back in the day and I enjoy them immensely. I got them for very cheap, cleaned them up, recapped it and changed the resistor on the tweeter for a bit more output and now 90% of my music listening is through them. They do require subs though, but every bookshelf speaker I've heard could benefit from subs. The 201 more than some others for sure, but ultimately it's necessary no matter what so I don't really see it as a downside. I have a feeling that I'd love to get a set of 301s in here. Maybe not, but the 201 sound a lot better than you'd think reading about the quality of drivers, crossovers, and cabinetry. If I were building my own speakers, I'd never imagine building something so "inferior", but here I am loving it. I didn't even brace the cabinet or anything. I did double the damping material inside which in truth is probably the wrong direction to take with these. In reality, the port sound probably be shortened a little to tune them higher. They are tuned to extend the bass depth at a reduced output. That would suggest that these things need placed very close to a wall to sound maximally flat, but Bose suggests you place them away from the wall.... Mine are close to the wall and still don't have enough bass in the room. Of course this lean tuning helps them blend with a sub more easily so I'm leaving them be for now. Nonetheless, that 'stereo everywhere'-type of sounding is indeed enjoyable for me and it's inspired me to research how to build a better 901. I would pass over Bose just because of the detractors. They do help me relax and enjoy the music. I do however crave a bigger, more powerful version of this same thing--or something similar.