DaveVoorhis
Addicted Member
Capacitors parameters on their own do not fully quantify audible results. A capacitor is part of a system; the system produces audible results, not an individual component on its own. Thus, claiming that the parameters of a capacitor "fully quantify the audible results" would be like claiming that the size of a clutch bolt defines the overall handling and drivability of a car.So are all manner of audio components in terms of simplistic metrics performed using sine waves or static tests.
Do you find those metrics - in any of the examples - fully quantify the audible results?
However, the action of a capacitor in its role in a circuit is fully quantifiable in terms of its parameters -- nominal capacity, inductance, ESR -- plus a whole host of operational limits, and how the basic parameters vary in relation to voltage, frequency and temperature. These contribute to the audible results of the circuit in a manner dependent entirely on the capacitor's role in a circuit.
I'm hoping you can learn to engage in a debate without resorting to immaturity (what's with the dial tone thing?) and ad hominems.I'm hoping your response will be from an experiential level as opposed to parroting what you find in catalogs.![]()
What is an "experiential level" of electronics experience? Shall I relate meter readings? Post oscilloscope traces?
I hope you're not hoping for some tale of my hearing "burn in". Such an anecdote would tell nothing, because we don't know whether experience of "burn in" is due to a change in sound, or due to a constant sound and a change in perception.