• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Classic High-End Gear

I truly believe that all TOTL receivers from the latter 70's are basically equal to each other. Some have a particular signature sound, but they are all, collectively, excellent examples of analog audio engineering, never to be replicated. I am particularly impressed with the Nikko NR-1415 and Hitachi SR-2004 and Fisher RS-1080. Yes, I do own a Pioneer SX-1250 and Marantz 2385, among others. These are, collectively, the pinnacles of analog stereo audio.
You left out the Yamaha VFET amps. In particular, the B-1 & B-2.
 
I like my Pioneer SX-1980, I agree the Hitachi SR-2004 is the monster receiver sleeper almost no one credits with being good as it truly is. I love my Rotel RA-1412. I love my Sansui G-9000. I have two Pioneer SX-1250's they too are awesome. Another fun receiver is the Pioneer SX-D7000 flouroscan digital unit. I had mine totally restored with all its lights and systems working it is a thing of beauty to behold. I love my Marantz 2330B another under appreciated gem in my opinion. Finally the Pioneer SX-1280 is pretty and powerful. I love them all. Most of all I am happy my collections are complete. I have NOTHING LEFT TO BUY!
 
I truly believe that all TOTL receivers from the latter 70's are basically equal to each other. Some have a particular signature sound, but they are all, collectively, excellent examples of analog audio engineering, never to be replicated. I am particularly impressed with the Nikko NR-1415 and Hitachi SR-2004 and Fisher RS-1080. Yes, I do own a Pioneer SX-1250 and Marantz 2385, among others. These are, collectively, the pinnacles of analog stereo audio.
The Wolf agrees 100%. Thanks for your response.
 
I need to
I truly believe that all TOTL receivers from the latter 70's are basically equal to each other. Some have a particular signature sound, but they are all, collectively, excellent examples of analog audio engineering, never to be replicated. I am particularly impressed with the Nikko NR-1415 and Hitachi SR-2004 and Fisher RS-1080. Yes, I do own a Pioneer SX-1250 and Marantz 2385, among others. These are, collectively, the pinnacles of analog stereo audio.
I know that many people here do not own multiple vintage TOTL receivers. It is expensive. I apologize to those who have not owned or listened to some of lesser known receivers I listed in my post. Just to point out that there are great receivers out there that are not Pioneer, Marantz or Sansui.
I truly believe that all TOTL receivers from the latter 70's are basically equal to each other. Some have a particular signature sound, but they are all, collectively, excellent examples of analog audio engineering, never to be replicated. I am particularly impressed with the Nikko NR-1415 and Hitachi SR-2004 and Fisher RS-1080. Yes, I do own a Pioneer SX-1250 and Marantz 2385, among others. These are, collectively, the pinnacles of analog stereo audio.
 
Not so quick.If you do a search here at AK you will see that the Fisher was given the title of best ever receiver by an AK member twenty years ago.

 
Back to the superior performance of separate components. Receivers need not apply, but thanks for asking for admittance.

is there a brand where the receiver performs better than the companies separates? Top separates vs. top receivers?
 
Last edited:
Just got one of these to restore, need another three for a retro 3-way speaker project, supposedly no added distortion, I'm gonna use them for the mids, and treble. Luxman AS-10.

4467e27.jpg4467e2a.jpg
4467e29.jpg
 
JVC QL-Y5F with a AT12S Cart with an original shibata stylus. I also run it with a Denon 103. Great turntable, I also have a Technics Sl MA1 but prefer the JVC.
 
Since I last posted in this thread almost 3 years ago,I have made some upgrades to my system.
I think my whole system pretty much fits the criteria for type of gear for this thread.
Micro Seiki DD 40
McIntosh MR 78
McIntosh C32
McIntosh MC 2250
JBL L150A

View attachment 3563782
If your amp generates a lot of heat, which this one probably does, you need to put it on top of the rack. Maybe put the turntable on a separate table to the side. Otherwise, you'll burn that amp up. I have a Yamaha B-2, and that is my cardinal rule for placement.

Also, I hope you're not in earthquake country.
 
Since I last posted in this thread almost 3 years ago,I have made some upgrades to my system.
I think my whole system pretty much fits the criteria for type of gear for this thread.
Micro Seiki DD 40
McIntosh MR 78
McIntosh C32
McIntosh MC 2250
JBL L150A

View attachment 3563782
Oh yeah this here is the very definition of SWEET in Audiophile quality gear. Congrats you dun did well!
 
My apologies if I already posted it, Guys :rolleyes:... My Classic High End Audio Gear is :

Tubes :

Audio Research SP3A1 preamp + D76 power amp.

OXn2Ob-my-SP3A1-and-D76.jpg


Solid State :

ACCUPHASE E-560 integrated amp + extension cards DAC50 (dac) & AD50 (phono).

22092209464125019418004689.jpg


McIntosh C712 preamp + MC7100 power amp.

8oPsOb-P1150814.jpg


Turntable :

TECHNICS SL-1200G.

6cZgQb-P1180090.jpg


CD Player :

Marantz CD-80, under a NAD 114 preamp and a YAMAHA CD-S300 (not High-End).

1753985072301.png

Speakers :

Only If a pair of MAGNEPAN SMGb (extreme L and R) and a pair of KLIPSCH HERESY I (background) are considered High-End...

p1l4Sb-P1200162.jpg


T
 
If your amp generates a lot of heat, which this one probably does, you need to put it on top of the rack. Maybe put the turntable on a separate table to the side. Otherwise, you'll burn that amp up. I have a Yamaha B-2, and that is my cardinal rule for placement.

Also, I hope you're not in earthquake country.
Nope,not in earthquake country.
Not concerned with heat,I have a small fan keeping the amp cool when in use. It works real well.
 
Back
Top Bottom