Arthur Smith
Super Member
It can be done...
I am finding that it's really not as bad of a little player as everyone has said it was. I think owning several good component turntables as I do, prepared me not to expect miracles. But for what it is, I have been pleased. So much so that I bought a second one, in black. I am going to keep one for 45's, and sent away for a 78RPM stylus, and will dedicate that player for my shellac.Bypassing the internal amp and speakers and connecting the output of the cartridge directly to an amplifier with a high-impedance ceramic/crystal phono input will make the largest improvement in sound quality. Some of the other brands of these little suitcase record players do properly match the impedance of the ceramic cartridge, but Crosley does not.
What are these?I think owning several good component turntables as I do,
I am finding that it's really not as bad of a little player as everyone has said it was......
Have you tried one? They are actually a lot of fun, especially if you own several component turntables.It seems to me you prove in your video that it is "bad as everyone says it is". Tinny speakers with no bass and tracking force of over 5 grams that you have to add Mickey Mouse weights to the back. Don't understand why anyone who "owns several good component tables" would think this is anything other than the plastic piece of carp that it obviously is. Sorry, I'm not convinced.
If you watch the video, you'll see the "mods" I did are reversible, and non invasive. These players are a lot of fun for what they are.They are good record players, I have bought two of them. One for my girlfriends 6yo daughter and one for my 7yo niece. They love them. I wouldnt play anything I own on them, diamond stylus or not. If you are going to "mod" it and bypass the internal amp and speakers imho you are wasting your time, considering the number of vintage "turntables" available for the same amount of money.Like the Akai I picked up at Goodwill for $29.
Because it's fun, and because, I can. Stuffing the thing with fiberglass, and attaching a counterweight to the back of the tonearm hardly constitutes "effort". And it made the player more enjoyable. YMMVCaveat: Only "briefly" watched the video...
I'm just curious what the benefit/motivation is for putting the effort into the Crosley?
I too have owned and experimented with a Crosley (a very early "portable" circa 2005), and even had it hooked into a home AV setup for a little while and played records on it.
It DID work but ultimately couldn't justify it as single record player with other/better options available.
The stack-o-matic mods and use I kinda get "more" being that there arent any new stacker options out there.
I'm all about "use what you got," but with other options i come away with a big "why?"
Ben
Because it's fun, and because, I can. Stuffing the thing with fiberglass, and attaching a counterweight to the back of the tonearm hardly constitutes "effort". And it made the player more enjoyable. YMMV
I actually have two diamond styli being delivered today. I found out about them thanks to vwestlife's great video.I get it, and though it sounds like it I am not criticizing. You can buy diamond stylus for these and it does improve the sound. But it still is what it is, a cheap record player.
Keep in mind the amount of inflation that has occurred since then. An "inexpensive" turntable that cost $179 in the late 1970s is equivalent to over $600 in today's money.None of my budget TTs pick up that and at a price point the '70 cheapos bulldoze the crap you are trying to sink money into and improve.