In technical terms, what is the intention of a 76 joule capacity power supply in a device whose power output is measured in milliwatts?My current preamp's power supply has twice the energy storage as the D150 power amplifier (38 joules).
In technical terms, what is the intention of a 76 joule capacity power supply in a device whose power output is measured in milliwatts?
A 205/60x13 in current gumball Toyo Proxes R888R might improve on that somewhat. Like playing a CD through a Crown instead of a 78rpm record.Using the metrics I previously listed and I do favor smaller, higher revving motors. Cornering at 1.0G can be fun. The OE 165/80-13s on a 2002 delivered - what 0.72?
I agree on both of those but isn't the evolution of the Boxster engine to today's 718 somewhat antithetical to your assumption that newer is always better? Or is more horsepower all that matters?I find my mid-engined Porsche Boxster checks all the performance and fun boxes. An older S2000 nearly so.

Cornering at 1.0G can be fun
Perhaps I misplaced the modifier - the SP20 has 38 (940 uF running 285V rails) while the D150 has 19 (18,800 uF running 45V rails).In technical terms, what is the intention of a 76 joule capacity power supply in a device whose power output is measured in milliwatts?
If you actually quoted what I said, you'll find an important adjective - "all facets of audio gear". Having said that, I really enjoy the instant response of direct injection along with the selectable mode PDK tranny for lighting quick shifts and launch control. Surely, you understand that virtually all car companies in the market are forced to develop smaller, more efficient turbocharged engines to meet increasingly stricter governmental mandates. Mine's a 2013 with the six. And the upcoming GT4 will also have one.I agree on both of those but isn't the evolution of the Boxster engine to today's 718 somewhat antithetical to your assumption that newer is always better?
Sorry, but I don't agree. My experience with them as owner and listener has always been mediocre. Rugged, reliable they may be - like pickup trucks. Fine for subwoofers, though.Sounds like we all agree that Crown is a victim of unfair generalization . . . the question in this thread title.
With wider, modern tires sure. Not, however, with 165/80s of the day. Car & Driver measured 0.82.My 1976 914 would do that all day long...
With wider, modern tires sure. Not, however, with 165/80s of the day. Car & Driver measured 0.82.
To suggest that any amplifier's distortion and noise playing music (as opposed to uncorrelated sine waves) is "below the threshold of audibility" is absurd.(2)distortion (THD and IM) is below the threshold of audibility at all power levels short of clipping, (3) noise is below audibility...Emphasis mine. Is that true?
The larger the filter capacitors, the lower the ripple current (or "hum") for a given current draw from the power supply. A low current draw, e.g., a preamplifier compared to a power amplifier, means smaller filter capacity will be sufficient to achieve a reasonable level of ripple rejection compared to that required for a power amplifier. Higher current draw requires larger filter capacitors to achieve the same level of ripple rejection.Perhaps I misplaced the modifier - the SP20 has 38 (940 uF running 285V rails) while the D150 has 19 (18,800 uF running 45V rails).
Dave, understand that with any amplification device, the power supply is the amplifier. The active devices modulate the signal. I learned this lesson forty years ago with Frank Van Alstine created the Double Dyna 400 amp and FET5 preamp (I had the latter). I took a page out of his book and similarly modified my Audire One amplifier. I replaced the bridge with a 30A unit and added an external power supply with another 60,000 uF of capacitance bringing the total to 80,000 uF. Result? Added transparency, but mainly improved dynamics at both ends of the scale.
Thanks for the humorous experience-free speculation! Designers of the best audio gear would just smile and shake their head.Thus, the difference in joules stored in their respective filter capacitors is purely incidental; a mere side-effect of the necessarily higher rail voltage of the tubed SP20. It is no more a basis for comparing an SP20 to a D150 than seat upholstery colour is a measure of performance differences between a Honda N2000 and a Ford F150.
If they're designing gear based on electronics, they'd agree with me. My "speculation" isn't experience-free, it's basic electronics.Thanks the humorous experience-free speculation! Designers of the best audio gear would just smile and shake their head.
Obviously, they don't. LOL!If they're designing gear based on electronics, they'd agree with me.
Always. Experiment for yourself some day to understand.There may be cases where the joules of energy stored in the filter capacitors are a reasonable basis for some comparison.
They are merely two superlative examples of audio gear where the designer understands the value of ultra stiff power supplies....but comparing a tube preamplifier to a solid-state power amplifier isn't one of them.
There is a gauge in the configurable cluster that provides real time G force in all four directions (lateral L-R, acceleration, braking).Using the preamp to spot weld panels on his Boxster that popped off going round corners when pulling 1.0G.
