and pray tell.....where is the 59L now?....oh yeah, they don't make it anymore. if it was so great, denon would still be making it, wouldn't they? technics has been making the 1200 since the 1970's, and it's still being made today....2009. that one fact alone speaks volumes about the design, reliability, ruggedness, longevity, and popularity of this table. if the 1200 was such crap, technics would have dumped it ages ago.
again, my vote is with the 1200.
Well, how many companies are still producing turntables? Matsushita, owner of Panasonic/Technics (and for many years JVC), are a much larger company than D&M Holdings, owner of Denon. The only reason that the SL-1200 is still in existence is due to the large, continuing market for it from DJ's. That's mainly due to the fact that it's predominately made of aluminium alloy and can be bashed around, not due to the fact that it's the best turntable out there. It's certainly capable of good performance, but not of equivalent performance to any of the later 1980's top end Denon turntables (or top end Technics, come to that). It's not the best turntable that Technics made, although it is probably the most profitable, and the highest selling. The SP-10 and SP-15 were actually far better in performance than the SL-1200 (similar to the better Denons), and were seen in far more radio stations than the SL-1200, which wasn't originally aimed at professional use. Where are they now? Based on your logic, you'd think that because they were really good and tough, they'd still be in existence. Have you been in a radio station recently, and seen a turntable anywhere? I'd be surprised if you had.
I don't own a Denon turntable, or a Technics, but I have got hi-fi reviews of them, using the calibrated test records that aren't available any more, and which gave independent, believable results which allowed comparison between different turntables, similar to the testing which is still done with amplifiers and other equipment these days. I'm purely an impartial observer, to whom performance at reasonable cost is more important than buying the toughest, or most popular turntable. I wouldn't mind owning a Denon, at the right price, and nor would I mind owning a Technics SL-1300 or SL-1400, which are the auto and semi-auto versions of the SL-1200, and hence capable of utilising most of the SL-1200 spares out there. But I don't kid myself that the Technics SL-12/13/1400 will be the best turntable I could own - I've seen tests, and unless the particular SL-1200's were bad examples, there were plenty of late-1970's and 1980's turntables by manufacturers such as Denon, Luxman, Linn, Thorens, Sansui, Sony, Rega, JVC and Yamaha, which produced measurably better results. As far as I know, the only ones which still exist today relatively unchanged are the Linn Sondek LP12, and The Rega P3, which are produced by small companies still run by their founders. Even the Technics SL-1300 and 1400, which were much more popular among hi-fi buyers (according to my mate the former hi-fi salesman, who sold them), don't exist today, although they were essentially identical in performance and build to the SL-1200 (and yes, I have worked on all of them, as a repairer). There isn't a major market for turntables these days, in case you've been in a coma for the past 25 years, because most music is sold in different forms, so many manufacturers dropped them (along with most tape players) from their ranges to concentrate on equipment which sold better.
-Don