And looking back over all my room measurements I see that, indeed, everything looked good below 40 Hz every time. Good to know, Dave. Thanks.
There seems to be a common belief that a subwoofer should have very little to no overlap with the mains, but I get much better results doing just the opposite.
I run my mains wide open, and run my subs up to 100-150hz. The subs overlapping with the mains is more beneficial to the distributed bass smoothing effect than running the subs with a very low crossover point. Also, some think unless you run the sub with a really low crossover point, you'll be able to locate it more easily, but again, I disagree. Localization is generally due to the sub/subs being too loud in relation to the mains not the crossover point. I cannot hear mine or tell where they are, but if I turn them off, the rooms bass goes to crap.
But what about speakers where the woofer/s is being run full-range (like mine and a lot of other vintage speakers from the tube era)? Or does that not matter? Just curious. I'll eventually have to try the sub thing, but I have a lot of things to consider before I do it (Basically, if I do it at all, I want to make sure I do it right... VERY-pleased with the way things are already sounding, plus I have close neighbors, so... Still trying to give the idea the proper consideration though).
He was saying that he runs them wide open, with no highpass filter. My speakers get pretty low in room, but the augmentation by a subwoofer REALLY improves the way they sound.
I have an NHT sub sitting here waiting for me to get serious so I can run a pair, and a third isn't out of the realm of possibility at all.

But what about speakers where the woofer/s is being run full-range (like mine and a lot of other vintage speakers from the tube era)? Or does that not matter? Just curious. I'll eventually have to try the sub thing, but I have a lot of things to consider before I do it (Basically, if I do it at all, I want to make sure I do it right... VERY-pleased with the way things are already sounding, plus I have close neighbors, so... Still trying to give the idea the proper consideration though).
RayW
It will depend on your room's longest dimension. Once the wavelength is longer than 2x that dimension you're pressurizing the room and you don't have longitudinally traveling wave anymore. When the frequency gets down there the whole room gets pressurized so you don't have pressure nodes anymore.
Just keep in mind the fundamental concept with distributed bass is to "flood" the room with LF content (from several sources deliberately located in different areas of the room) to overcome any acoustic anomalies (caused by the room's acoustics) that may be preventing a flat LF response at the listening position. Your Wharfedales would be contributing along with any additional subs you supplement them with (since those 90's can dig pretty deep on their own), so if you implemented DB your mains would become a component of the DB system. If you feel like you're already getting a nice, flat LF response with no nulls or peaks (where certain bass notes sound disproportionately weak or loud compared to others) you may not benefit from DB as much as someone who is suffering "one (or two, or three) note bass".
What mic,s are you guys using, or best bang for the buck with some calibration.

What mic,s are you guys using, or best bang for the buck with some calibration.