• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

First vintage system

I have been using eBay as a buyer since 1999ish. Cars (a lot), motorcycles (many), stereo crap (a few things) and lot-o-other crap... about 1200ish things total. I can't remember any bad experiences, that said I do my due diligence. I think many that have problems get excited and just mash the bid or BIN button without due diligence.

Just sold my last pair of Heresys on eBay, smooth transaction

Purchased 8yrs ago for $400, sold for $830, I like getting to use stuff for free and make money on the deal lol

They were series one and looked like new, the buyer was very happy

IMG_20230723_154142439.jpg

IMG_20230723_154207866.jpg

IMG_20230723_154154518.jpg

IMG_20230723_154448942.jpg

IMG_20230723_143509002.jpg

IMG_20230723_144044189.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: j!m
I see a lot of the same thing on bicycle forums - an all-Campagnolo racing bike from the '70s is classic and all else is scrutinized. Same silver vs. black argument, same time-frame questions, and very similar snobbishness in both directions - comments about gas-pipe vs. plastic, etc. (Not accusing anyone in this thread, btw)

To the OP, now that you are aware of the revered time-period, hopefully you won't take future mentions of BPC personally, as most here would agree that there are many fine-sounding pieces of every vintage, and likely few or none here are actually looking down at your choices, despite what it may seem.
As someone who repaired bikes in the late 70's, I prefered the Sun Tour equipped Japanese bikes over Campy, Huret or Simplex equipped bikes. I still have my Fuji Finest from the 70's. The 70's seemed to be a very nice era for mechanical and electronic equipment craftsmanship, especially coming from Japan. That includes those nice Nikon F series cameras.
 
Welcome to the fray!

I started building my system in the 80's with BPB's. I had a self-imposed $100 limit back then (about $285.00 in today's money) for each component. I got a lot of crappy stuff. Being a musician, I wanted better, and started buying used, high-end stuff. The high end, has a high and low end within it as well... So, I ended up with Aragon, PS Audio and ultimately Counterpoint stuff. Also, Sony, Teac and Thorens.

Sony makes decent stuff that functions and is durable enough- some of the other lower end 80's stuff (from any maker) has issues with the plastic buttons and switches failing. The 70's stuff used more metal. A lot more. Like Sgt. Shultz, I have a stack of Kenwood components. Same tape deck as him (two KX-1030's) but a KA-9100 integrated, KT-8300 tuner (which started me down the Kenwood rabbit hole) and a KD-5070 table. This stuff is built SOLID. Sony ES is worth seeking out. These components often look the same as the lower end counterparts, but better mechanical and electrical build. Some came with polished wood "cheeks" as well. Still quite sharp looking.

In my case, I just decided one day I wanted a stack of silver face components. I found myself of FMtuner.info (I think that's the site) where I learned all about the Kenwood L0- series (FM only) tuner and the second place KT-8300. From there, I sought out the other "top" (outside the true top L0-) gear from ~1977 and built my system. I even have Kenwood speakers to go with it. Just because.

I guess my point is that you need a place to start and then you can decide your path.

And if you want "black face" components, note the Sansui had some really slick looking separates with a black face and a tan/cream dials and meters in the 70's that I really like the look of. Overall, from the 70's I think they had the best look in a sea of silver. Their tuners were quite good too actually.

My everyday listening system is a Pioneer SX-880 I repaired and restored. That is fed by a Tascam CD player/recorder, my phono preamp (Wyn Palmer circuit) and the magnificent Micro-Seiki BL-91 turntable. Now, Micro is interesting in that their stuff is really well engineered, looks fantastic, and is so overbuilt, it should still be working perfectly 40-50 years on. I did rebuild the power supply (also did a small mod to accommodate 120V as it was originally 100V only) A BL-71 for example is the upper low-end from Micro and better than 90% of the competition. The -91 is the bottom of the upper end, but next is the 111 which has a vacuum clamp that I wasn't interested in, and then they get a bit wacky looking (which many like, and the prices reflect this).

Research! The specs are okay for comparison, just bear in mind those were on brand new gear under laboratory conditions. If you can find old reviews in Stereophile (most lower-end stuff is not covered) they use a standardized test method, which makes comparisons a bit more valuable. The caveat is you need to have heard at least one component in a comparison list as an "anchor" to understand the comparisons that might be made.

Good luck! It's fun and frustrating at the same time!

I have three more KX-1030's and two more KT-7300's in the closet lol

I like the old Kenwood stuff, I also have three KA-4006, this sweet little amp has a real synergy with the Klipsch Heresy and why I have three......and now i've sold my last pair lol.

Kenwood-KA-4006.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: j!m
As someone who repaired bikes in the late 70's, I prefered the Sun Tour equipped Japanese bikes over Campy, Huret or Simplex equipped bikes. I still have my Fuji Finest from the 70's. The 70's seemed to be a very nice era for mechanical and electronic equipment craftsmanship, especially coming from Japan. That includes those nice Nikon F series cameras.
I also preferrd Suntour components. I didn't have a lot of exposure to "nicer" stuff back then, but the Suntour always worked.
 
IMG_3259.JPG
The dent on my Mojo, since we digressed into bikes a bit...

IMG_3390.JPG
Pioneer is sold; still have the Kenwood. ESL restored it as far as they could. Corrosion on the Dolby chip excludes recording (noise), but playback is good.

IMG_4550.JPG
The tuner that started it all for me with Kenwood, and a Nak I need to fix the meters on so I can sell off...

IMG_4562.JPG
Forgot about the Kenwood open reel... I sold that off already. Other stuff I still have, including the Alesis 24-track hard disc recorder and second KX-1030

IMG_4934.JPG
Pioneer 880 in my office, all resored and sounding good!

IMG_5428.JPG
Three main Kenwood components.

JYWO5047.JPGRPDJ1535.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_E4934.JPG
    IMG_E4934.JPG
    42.4 KB · Views: 2
View attachment 2955910
The dent on my Mojo, since we digressed into bikes a bit...

View attachment 2955911
Pioneer is sold; still have the Kenwood. ESL restored it as far as they could. Corrosion on the Dolby chip excludes recording (noise), but playback is good.

View attachment 2955912
The tuner that started it all for me with Kenwood, and a Nak I need to fix the meters on so I can sell off...

View attachment 2955913
Forgot about the Kenwood open reel... I sold that off already. Other stuff I still have, including the Alesis 24-track hard disc recorder and second KX-1030

View attachment 2955914
Pioneer 880 in my office, all resored and sounding good!

View attachment 2955915
Three main Kenwood components.

View attachment 2955917View attachment 2955918

First, it looks like we have a similar taste in gear with all the Kenny equipment, then there's this

Nakamichi MR-1
Screenshot_20230811-154426.png

That's a Kenwood KD-770D hiding there, also have a KD-500/Grace G-707 arm, ya I'm a fan of the brand

Teac C-3RX (Tascam 122B)
IMG_20230522_180139097.jpg

Second, you need to get some handles for those pieces lol. The D7 should fit your tuner I believe and the ultra rare D10 for the cassette and amp, neither are cheap, and the handles for the Teac were even more.
 
Last edited:
I have a set of handles off something- the tuner I think, but they're a bit rusty.

I had wood sides on one of the cassette decks but sold them.

My current 9100 has the wood enclosure- not crazy about that, so I have some of the tins for it. I prefer the industrial look to the furniture look for the separates.

I had a 122 (mark I) many years ago but it lacks the onboard oscillator, so I upgraded to the newer one. The Mk. II is supposedly "the best" with individual bias settings for each tape type (internally) but I like the sleek modern feel of the Mk. III. Both of my Mk. IIIs have been gone through by Sam at Skywave. (You can run two decks off one remote with a serial splitter- great for making high quality copies off the hard disc or other source)
 
I have a set of handles off something- the tuner I think, but they're a bit rusty.

I had wood sides on one of the cassette decks but sold them.

My current 9100 has the wood enclosure- not crazy about that, so I have some of the tins for it. I prefer the industrial look to the furniture look for the separates.

I had a 122 (mark I) many years ago but it lacks the onboard oscillator, so I upgraded to the newer one. The Mk. II is supposedly "the best" with individual bias settings for each tape type (internally) but I like the sleek modern feel of the Mk. III. Both of my Mk. IIIs have been gone through by Sam at Skywave. (You can run two decks off one remote with a serial splitter- great for making high quality copies off the hard disc or other source)

According to my research the transport in the original is superior to the later models, much more robust and less prone to failure

I'm with you on the industrial look, but I do like the rosewood used on the Pioneer Elite pieces, and wood cases for receivers like my Pioneer SX-1010, the only receiver I've ever owned, inherited from my father in law.
20220125_222342.jpg

I also like the wood panels on the Soundcraftsmen MA-5002, and it has handles
Screenshot_20220507-122943.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: j!m
The later Tascam decks did use more plastic, but they still managed to survive professional use.

The most important thing (to me) is the sound quality. Or better said: accuracy. No coloration just recording what it’s fed.
 
The later Tascam decks did use more plastic, but they still managed to survive professional use.

The most important thing (to me) is the sound quality. Or better said: accuracy. No coloration just recording what it’s fed.

Exactly, the Teac C-3RX makes tapes virtually identical to the source with all tape types, I stole it about 2yrs ago for $175, gotta love eBay.
 
Last edited:
Yeah my second one went from the eBay seller straight to Sam. He did his magic- addressing all the known issues and set it up for my tapes. Better specs now than advertised new.

I ran both decks and the Alesis Masterlink for a while but I’ve weened off tapes again. I’ll keep one Tascam (the earlier Japan made one) and sell the other. I’ll keep the remote too because they are pretty rare.
 
Yeah my second one went from the eBay seller straight to Sam. He did his magic- addressing all the known issues and set it up for my tapes. Better specs now than advertised new.

I ran both decks and the Alesis Masterlink for a while but I’ve weened off tapes again. I’ll keep one Tascam (the earlier Japan made one) and sell the other. I’ll keep the remote too because they are pretty rare.

I still like making tapes, the MR-1 is calibrated for Maxell type II, I also have a Carver TD-1700 (Aiwa AD F880) next to the Nak that makes outstanding tapes.

The Kenwood KX-1030 once calibrated makes decent enough tapes but it's age shows when up against the newer decks so it's only used for playback.
 
....in my humble opinion the Japanese manufacturers & engineers were dedicated to making quality controlled engineered, well built pieces of equipment that was a symbol of pride for them and their companies some of which had/have been in business since the early mid 1900's

.. The 70's seemed to be a very nice era for mechanical and electronic equipment craftsmanship, especially coming from Japan. That includes those nice Nikon F series cameras.

Agreed!!!,
 
So today I have been experimenting with the MD player, it came with a few discs and I have been playing them and comparing them to tuner. The music on the MD sounds noticeably worse, there are no lows, no clarity on highs, everything sounds compressed.

I don't consider myself as "golden ears", I have listened to MP3 music through junk computer speakers, but A/B:ing this minidisc against radio there is absolutely no contest.

Is it really so that a mere radio (40s technology) can transmit so much more clarity than MD (90s tech)? I cannot believe this. Maybe something is off in my setup.
 
Now I am thinking it would be neat to have the ability to play music through this retro setup from bluetooth or network. From google I can see there are ton of options, from tiny BT dongles to modern AV receivers. Do any of you know any "black pizza box" which could sit on my stack, looking not too out of place, while having modern connectivity options?
 
Do you know if the minidisks were recorded normally, or long play (long play is lower quality) ? As they usually sound pretty good ime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: j!m
The music on the MD sounds noticeably worse, there are no lows, no clarity on highs, everything sounds compressed.

MD recordings should provide a pretty nice replication of the source material. Try recording with the MD from the tuner or other source and see if the sound improves.


Do any of you know any "black pizza box" which could sit on my stack, looking not too out of place, while having modern connectivity options?

There are many options, what's your budget? I recently bought a WIIM Pro for a little over $100. I use it to stream music and really like it. There are numerous threads about the WIIM products and other devices on AK.
 
Yeah I dabbled in MD for a while but gave it up. Sony had a proprietary system they used but otherwise I think there were three compressions, ranging from bad to horrible.

“It’s better than nothing” but honestly well done cassettes sound much better.
 
Back
Top Bottom