SimplerTimes
Super Member
MacGyver'd Component System ...![]()

MacGyver'd Component System ...![]()

Here are some pics of the newest one. The blue film resistors on the amp board are the resistors I installed to recalibrate the current limit. The original 3245-00 sets it to 8 ohm at max power and I believe that was the intent. The later 3245-10 (this model) sets it so the output power is about 45W current-limited with a 4 ohm load, or equal to an 8 ohm rated load. The 3245-00 current-limit chokes 4 ohm loads down to 28W !! I had these setup a little different and plan to change the resistors again to get the ratio correct. The original 330 ohm resistors will now get changed to 220 ohm. This will set the 4 ohm limit to 75W, the same as the 8 ohm rating. Impedance in between those two values will tap the remaining power that the transformer is rated to put out. The 3245 is rated for 45W 8 ohm and transformer at 55W per channel, and 3275 is rated for 75W 8 ohm per channel and the transformer is rated for 87.5W. It would push about 115W RMS into 4 ohms if it wasn't current limited, but would eventually overheat the transformer if ran that high. From what I can tell, the current-limiting is there to protect the transformer from over-heating. But real music is different than a steady sine wave and the actual RMS power would not be over 87.5W the transformer is rated for as long as it was kept out of clipping. So who knows, maybe I'll try it without current-limit and see what happens. All 3 of the receivers I mentioned have transformers sized for just under 8 ohm speakers for max RMS power. The other components can handle more, and the circuit breakers were there to protect the speakers.

Thanks. It has been fun. It's actually a bit of a childhood dream, in that this was the model receiver I grew up with. When I was 12 I traded my SuperScope R350 + $50 for the MCS 3245-10. I had the cover off of that one several times looking at things I wanted to improve. I really wanted to put bigger power caps in because that was something I knew about, but was afraid I would wreck something and there goes my awesome stereo. I left it alone and played 4 and 8 ohm speakers hard all the time and never did any damage. Well, now I know why... 45W limit. If only I knew to remove those resistors. haha. I also remember getting a book from the school library on hifi stereo equipment and the MCS 3275 was in there. I was disappointed to find out I didn't have the top model (wasn't aware of the 3125 at that time). But I already had a good 10 band Audio Control Octave equalizer and didn't have any interest in getting a receiver with an EQ built in and all those lights on it. I later got into cars and sold that original receiver. But 20 years later, I've now restored and owned many of them. So now it has come full circle and I got the receiver I wanted.Very cool project and amazing results!
Thanks. It has been fun. It's actually a bit of a childhood dream, in that this was the model receiver I grew up with. When I was 12 I traded my SuperScope R350 + $50 for the MCS 3245-10. I had the cover off of that one several times looking at things I wanted to improve. I really wanted to put bigger power caps in because that was something I knew about, but was afraid I would wreck something and there goes my awesome stereo. I left it alone and played 4 and 8 ohm speakers hard all the time and never did any damage. Well, now I know why... 45W limit. If only I knew to remove those resistors. haha. I also remember getting a book from the school library on hifi stereo equipment and the MCS 3275 was in there. I was disappointed to find out I didn't have the top model (wasn't aware of the 3125 at that time). But I already had a good 10 band Audio Control Octave equalizer and didn't have any interest in getting a receiver with an EQ built in and all those lights on it. I later got into cars and sold that original receiver. But 20 years later, I've now restored and owned many of them. So now it has come full circle and I got the receiver I wanted.![]()
