Looks like only 6 capsbtotal have been replacedHi, congratulation! great speaker's, like Nashou said, first listen them. The difference is the use of different inside foam, the crossover MK I cut at 375hz compare to the MK II cut at 350hz. Sound of woofer more present, but still very natural. On you're photo of capacitors we can not see all the values, but it is probably 60 uf and 100 uf with rhe 6 uf show in you're photo, hard to say. The Mk II improved have the Elac units, but the celestion and kef units of your's is consider by some peoples to have better sound and much easer to fix or find and specially now with the new units of Falcon accoustics for new midranges and new woofer's (take more power). Best regards, yvan.
Thanks for your reply Yvan! Yeah ill just leave the film caps for now. Do i need to change any other caps or is that all of them ?( via the invoice) what other upgrades have you done on yours? i am very happy with the sound and cant wait to hear them with a nice tube preamp when i find one i like. . i love my super compacts just as much but the tls obviously fill the room better . Thanks again!!Hi, I just saw the picture of the invoice, so he replace with Dayton audio 240V., good choice, they are film capacitors and not electrolytics like the old one, will last forever these 3 values if you don't overpower you're speaker's. Some IMF aker's prefer to put same type of capacitor's like falcon acoustics kit (electrolytic). But listen them, and if you like the overall sound, tight bass and natural mid's, nice high frequency. Myself I have change all for film capacitors and I'm very happy with the overall sound.I don't think I have change the original voicing of my speaker's but I have spend time and money to improved them with good quality parts, Yvan.
Thanks Yvan, thanks mate. Very good advice and well worth looking into . They sound quite balanced as is but the mids when pushed could do with smoothing out a touch. Ill definately look into these modifications as they are staying with me forever. Are there more caps other than the 6 that were already replaced that need upgrading? could i also upgrade the foam to thicker grade ? And upgrade xo to be more like the mark 2?Hi, for me the one of the best improvment was to insulate the mids tube with active carbon 1/2 inches thick. Page 44 I have made many photos of it. At higher volume the sound of bass in transmission line can enter in the mids tube and vice versa the mids tube sounds can escape the tube and enter in transmission line affecting the clarity of the overall sound. Some people try putting some stuff on the tube to make it more proof sound. Today padding of active carbon is use as sound barrier and it's very good. They said because of these cavities the sound enter in it and make the space bigger, volume size. So in the imf mids tube it make an excellent job and improved the overall sound.Believe me because in your TLS 80 it is probably just a rool of foam as insulation. My Prof. was insulate with 4 pieces of fiberglass 2 inches X 1 inches X by the length of the tube. That's why the RSPM MK 7 have the mids above the high frequency in a complété section of the transmission line to be more isolate. Yvan.
IMFprof. MK III improved x-over
View attachment 598957
View attachment 598958
View attachment 598959
View attachment 598960
Yep I believe so. Still have not had the time to finish the restoration, other electronic projects keep coming. Ugh I need to stop looking on the net for more vintage gear ! lolHi Nasuou, the dark green is 0.47uf, the others light green are all 2.2 uf ? Yvan.