Well thanks for the info. You are suggesting replacing the midrange and tweeter while leaving the old crossover in place?There a still less expensive ways to improve the L100 compared to the above. 1) replace the LE5 with a 104 h-2 midrange. 2) roll off the 123a with a 1.5 inductor 3) punt the tweeter and replace with a modern dome such as a Scan Speak 9130.
The LE5 mid range driver is the source of most of the trouble, above roughly 1500 Hz, in the L100a. Here's it's unfiltered frequency response from one of my L100s:There a still less expensive ways to improve the L100 compared to the above. 1) replace the LE5 with a 104 h-2 midrange.
Yes, the woofer must be rolled off. The Murphy redesigned crossover uses a 2.5 mH steel laminated-core 15g inductor combined with a 40 µF capacitor that rolls off the woofer at about 950 Hz. That's high for a 12" woofer, but the LE5 mid range's ragged performance prevented a smooth transition any lower.2) roll off the 123a with a 1.5 inductor
The JBL LE25 1½" cone tweeter is clearly not a modern 1" dome, but it's performance is not a problem in the L100a, and doesn't need replacing. See it's frequency response below. That break-up resonance at about 15 kHz isn't really audible. The Scan Speak 9130, at $81 each, is hardly inexpensive.3) punt the tweeter and replace with a modern dome such as a Scan Speak 9130.
The LE5 mid range driver is the source of most of the trouble, above roughly 1500 Hz, in the L100a. Here's it's unfiltered frequency response from one of my L100s:
![]()
It was much easier to smooth out it's response and properly blend it with the woofer & tweeter by adding a few extra crossover parts, instead of replacing it.
What does the 104 H-2 frequency response look like?
Yes, the woofer must be rolled off. The Murphy redesigned crossover uses a 2.5 mH steel laminated-core 15g inductor combined with a 40 µF capacitor that rolls off the woofer at about 950 Hz. That's high for a 12" woofer, but the LE5 mid range's ragged performance prevented a smooth transition any lower.
The JBL LE25 1½" cone tweeter is clearly not a modern 1" dome, but it's performance is not a problem in the L100a, and doesn't need replacing. See it's frequency response below. That break-up resonance at about 15 kHz isn't really audible. The Scan Speak 9130, at $81 each, is hardly inexpensive.
![]()
I’ll begin working with the Murphy crossoverThe LE5 mid range driver is the source of most of the trouble, above roughly 1500 Hz, in the L100a. Here's it's unfiltered frequency response from one of my L100s:
![]()
It was much easier to smooth out it's response and properly blend it with the woofer & tweeter by adding a few extra crossover parts, instead of replacing it.
What does the 104 H-2 frequency response look like?
Yes, the woofer must be rolled off. The Murphy redesigned crossover uses a 2.5 mH steel laminated-core 15g inductor combined with a 40 µF capacitor that rolls off the woofer at about 950 Hz. That's high for a 12" woofer, but the LE5 mid range's ragged performance prevented a smooth transition any lower.
The JBL LE25 1½" cone tweeter is clearly not a modern 1" dome, but it's performance is not a problem in the L100a, and doesn't need replacing. See it's frequency response below. That break-up resonance at about 15 kHz isn't really audible. The Scan Speak 9130, at $81 each, is hardly inexpensive.
![]()
It seems the availability of crossover parts changes over time, and people have often wondered what other parts can substitute. If you run into this or any other questions as you work on this, I'll be glad to try and answer them.I’ll begin working with the Murphy crossover
using existing drivers first. Since I’ve already replaced walnut frames and tweeter foam and binder posts I’ll try and keep close to 1973 originals. These are very useful forums
thanks to both of you guys.
Yes, that's what I meant. There are some musical notes that can excite a harmonic overtone in the 6 to 7 kHz range, where the JBL mid-range driver has an unnatural sounding peak. When that happens, it's an ugly sounding noise, worse than shrill. The redesigned crossover eliminates that.
Thanks for the kind comments. Good luck with the project.
RichardYes, that's what I meant. There are some musical notes that can excite a harmonic overtone in the 6 to 7 kHz range, where the JBL mid-range driver has an unnatural sounding peak. When that happens, it's an ugly sounding noise, worse than shrill. The redesigned crossover eliminates that.
Thanks for the kind comments. Good luck with the project.

The last time I ordered those parts, on 12 Dec 2017, I ordered everything from Madisound. Shipping costs were lower than if I split the order between Madisound and PE. No other reason. I wouldn't worry over a difference between those 10 or 15 watt resistor failure ratings. I simply ordered what was available at the time. I'm certain you won't hear differences with those different resistorsQuestion - you used 10 watt Dayton Audio resistors and I purchased the 15 watt Madisosound resistors you suggest on your Dec 12,2017 parts list.
Also I went with the Dayton Non-inductive .05 (004-.51) resistor. Why are the resistors different wattage
.I've attached the Parts List and the Make Over info below. Both were last revised in December 2017, so it is possible that those parts may not all be available now. If you have any questions please feel free to ask.I have a set of 70’s era L100a Century IIs that have been sitting around collecting dust for the last 25 years. I have noticed the Bass and Tweeter on one shows some level of damage. I am angling to repair the Bass and replace the Tweeter.
While I am at it, I have been intrigued by the conversations about upgrading the crossover and particularly the one from Dennis Murphy.
Is anyone able to provide me a parts list I can begin with?
I've only seen the schematic diagram for the Gravesen crossover, but it never showed the component values. They were available only for those who bought the Jansen kit. Apparently, the kit's crossover details were copyrighted.Are the component values posted anywhere for Troels' modification as they are not given on his website?
As far as I understand, the 4311WX speakers came in oiled walnut cabinets, and the earlier 4311Bs came in painted gray cabinets. Other than the cabinet finishes, they were the same. The switch to 4311B involved woofers with ferrite magnets instead of the AlNiCo magnets. Their performances are similar but probably not identical.Is it safe to apply this crossover kit to JBL 4311WX ? (not 4311B). Original crossover network 3112 is the same for L100.
NickI still have one question though. As I’m restoring the 4311s I would like to keep the l-Pads functioning. Is there any way to incorporate those in the design? Perhaps I will not use them at all, but for the sake of having the original function of the speakers, it would be great If I could somehow incorporate the L-Pads.



After a quick glance, that pre-made crossover board looks to me like it's the same crossover design as was originally put in the L100a. The parts, including the variable L-pad resistors, are new, but they will suffer from the same flaws in the original design. The woofer and mid-range have no upper limit to their frequency responses. Those drivers have no low-pass filters at all.Good morning- new to this forum, as Ive gone down the rabbit hole on upgrading my L100a's Ive had since the early'70's. I use them daily. I was looking to buy a pre-made crossover board, as building them myself looks out of my skill sets. I've attached a pic of a replacement available on e-bay from LoudspeakerChief.com. In comparing to Dennis Murphys project, these look a bit anemic. I value your experts opinion on what route to take. Thanks in advance.
I was looking to buy a pre-made crossover board, as building them myself looks out of my skill sets.