Zack Sainz
Active Member
Here we go! Some bold statements were made. Take with a grain of salt.
Sean at Zero Fidelity had a sort of lukewarm review posted today. My take, anyhow.
For $2k, I'll pass.
I agree $2k is a lot, however at the end of the video he did say it’s his fav speaker at the $2k mark.
At the end of the day music makes us happy and I think it’s important to set boundaries with brands and pricing as all of our circumstances, wants, and needs are different.
Thanks for pointing out Zero’s review![]()
Whoa, yeah, you don’t need them at all! AR-3As for the win!I probably should have been more clear. The review was lukewarm for my needs. I can't really use another speaker of that size designed to be played on a short stand. AR-3a's currently hold that spot.
I agree 100% with the 8pm to 2am, my original 5s do that for me, however I live in an apartment so, I turn the volume down around 10pm, but they still sound amazing at low volumes. My 5s make me want to turn on my scott (sometimes visa versa) and explore and enjoy for HOURS at a time.The review linked above by Zero Fidelity seemed in line with Andrew Robinson's take on the new 5's. Hearing him describe his 8PM to 2AM listening session is exactly what I experience sometimes when I sit and listen to my Large Advents at night. Especially with the Fisher integrated tube amp. Sometimes it's not about accuracy but about the overall enjoyment. I would never pass up a good deal on a nice pair of original 5's, however there seem to be fewer and fewer available nowadays. If I can get close to or similar smiles with the new 5's and not have to recap or dope...2 grand seems like a fair price, especially when you also get the stands. I've seen those for 3-4 hundred bucks just by themselves!
Has anybody here listened to or bought a pair of the new 5's yet?
damn. all this talk about Scotts, Fishers, KLH's and Advents are making me want to lug about 160 lbs of speakers and amp up to the living room for a solid day of listening! I need to aerate the lawn for pete's sake!!!
Do it, NOW!damn. all this talk about Scotts, Fishers, KLH's and Advents are making me want to lug about 160 lbs of speakers and amp up to the living room for a solid day of listening! I need to aerate the lawn for pete's sake!!!
I have a set of originals, redoped. I've had new caps a couple years. Yet to update.
New 5s got a nice review.
Off topic:
New speakers are not cheap. With biggest % cost is building cabinets. There's a lot of choices at $2k. I bought (non-cabinet) Maggie 1.7i, at that price point. A different presentation.
Actually, you'd be surprised at the quality of speakers you can get for under $500/pair. If you don't need wood veneer or a fancy finish, that money can go a long way.New speakers are not cheap. With biggest % cost is building cabinets.
Actually, you'd be surprised at the quality of speakers you can get for under $500/pair. If you don't need wood veneer or a fancy finish, that money can go a long way.[/QUO
Now you know why the production run was so long, virtually unchanged sonically.I did watch some of zero's review and thought to myself. Why pay $2k for some speakers that are prob not as good as the originals? A quick search of local adds and a few days later I am a proud owner of klh 6 from 1967 in good working order. I like the 6's so much that I question if hifi is downgrading with the years of new tech. So I picked up a few more pairs of 50's/60's speakers! One pair has issues{another thread} the other is untested. The 6 has def been an eye opener.
Really good imaging and tone. I'm trying not to get to excited. It's still the honey moon phase. The gf thought I was playing the double impacts!Now you know why the production run was so long, virtually unchanged sonically.
I've owned both early and late production models, and prefer the early version with the epoxy mounted woofer, which goes a little deeper due to a longer excursion.