• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

marantz 8b review (1963)

Status
Not open for further replies.
ProAc_Fan said:
My amp builder has the schematic and the parts to build an 8B clone if someone wants the performance of that amp and can live without the name on it.

Mike
Iwould find that interesting as I have thought of it before. what does he use for output Iron? The original had some additional coils for some of the circuitry. I figured I would skip this part and just set the feedback so that the circuit has the same gain as the original and hope it is stable. How does he plan to do this?
Without this coil business, it isnt an 8b clone, just the front end is the same, but it should still be great. The output Iron will make a diffewrence, but the circuit should sound excellent even with other transformers.

Russellc

russellc
 
Well IMHO in a PP feedback amp the output iron is the single most important component in the amp. Since it is in fact the very first and last thing that touches the music or signal. The circuit is indeed important but no amount of circuit tweaking is going to make up for poorly wound transformers. Those extra coils/windings are indeed there for a reason if they had no real effect old Sal Marantz and Co would of left them out all together saving a few pennies on the cost of production. If you don't have the Iron your not getting the true 8B sound. In fact in the case of the 8B I'd venture to say not even close.

Craig
 
I used to own an 8B and was surprised to see how small the amplifier is compared to a McIntosh MC275 that was my first tube amp. The trannies on the 8B even with the outside potting look smallish. Very heavy though :D

You often don't see pictures of 8Bs with the transformer cover off. I happen to have taken one while I was restoring mine :

attachment.php
 
NOSValves said:
Well IMHO in a PP feedback amp the output iron is the single most important component in the amp. Since it is in fact the very first and last thing that touches the music or signal. The circuit is indeed important but no amount of circuit tweaking is going to make up for poorly wound transformers. Those extra coils/windings are indeed there for a reason if they had no real effect old Sal Marantz and Co would of left them out all together saving a few pennies on the cost of production. If you don't have the Iron your not getting the true 8B sound. In fact in the case of the 8B I'd venture to say not even close.


No doubt it made a difference but who said anything about using "poorly wound transformers" either. The amplifier I am now listening to is based on reverse engineered mcintosh transformers and the result is excellent. Similarly, Steve at angela insruments use to rave on about the 8b clone he use to make. I have no idea what he used for outputs as he never printed that one in his DIY section. I do not see any vintage marantz outputs for sale and if there were they would be terribly expensive. The fact that the transformer scheme is different takes nothing away from the excellent front end. Old Saul knew what he was doing there also. No it would not be the same amp, but I think it would still be an excellent amp. Heck an amps got to have a front end of some sort. I find that the front end of the power amp influences the sound considerably. This should be apparent to anyone whos played with various different ST 70 mods,(come to think of it, an 8B front end on the dyna would be interesting.) or built Diy tube power amps based on an existing vintage front end and found outputs that worked well with it ( reverse engineered in my case), then changed the power supply and B+ to operate larger tubes (6550 instead of 7591a in my case). That said, the marantz 8b outputs were very special units indeed and no doubt contribute substantially to the units fine sound. Similarly, another good output will also demonstrate its strengths as well, assuming it has any of course. Just my thoughts from things I have done myself and seen others do. I just see no reason to eliminate the 8b cirrcuit from use just because of the rarity of the outputs. I have also noticed the power supply of amps make a decided impact on their sonic signature. this shouldn't be to surprising as basically you are listening to the power supply, being modulated by the amp circuit. The 8b, like most vintage amps are weak in this area when compared to what could be with modern components. Would it sound different with a modern, stiffer power supply? Yes. It might even sound better, who knows? b I'm sure it would not be the same , but if that isnt available, why shouldnt someone use the circuit?

Russellc
 
Russell,

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying the circuit shouldn't be built without the iron. But what many I guess don't realize is... The front end of a Marantz 8B is nothing to right home about. A pentode input tube (voltage amp) with a long tailed pair phase splitter. Very basic but solid design in fact the entire amp is very basic. The magic is definitely in the Iron.

Craig
 
NOSValves said:
Russell,

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying the circuit shouldn't be built without the iron. But what many I guess don't realize is... The front end of a Marantz 8B is nothing to right home about. A pentode input tube (voltage amp) with a long tailed pair phase splitter. Very basic but solid design in fact the entire amp is very basic. The magic is definitely in the Iron.

Craig
Yes the front ends description sound archaic, but sounds great.
A pentode first stage? sounds like it could be noisey...but it isnt. Many simple circuits sound great. The only way this debate could be settled is to try the outputs with a different circuit, and I doubt thats going to happen, unless some lucky dude out there happens to have a couple sitting around! BTW, have you ever tried this (clone 8b) or is this just a feeling you have? I gues the closest way to somewhat settle the debate is to build a 8B clone. Steve at Angela has, and was very impressed. I was led to believe that it used someother transformer, but dont know which one it was, as I mentioned he never printed those plans in the DIY section even though I bugged him regularly about it for years in the 90s. If anyone did have a pair of outputs from marantz, Steve probably would! Yes the old tranformers are nice, but I dont know if they are the only source of the magic. An output transformer is probably one of the biggest weak points in a pushpull design..basically adesign compromise. A good transformer does as little damage as possible and logically isnt a source of magic in and of itself. That being said, these particular transformers were VERY important to this circuit, as is evidenced by the historical fact of all the trouble saul went to to get them done proper. NO DOUBT they have a great deal to do with the sound, but simple though it might be, SO does the circuit. Many old front end designs are extremely simple, especially the long tailed pair. they also happen to sound excellent. One of my current amps uses 1/2 of a 12ax7a as the amp, then a 12au7a as phase splitter. Basically it is extremely simple , but is so transparent
it is ridiculous.In the 8B, that pentode first tube also has a lot of drive, and when run quietly in the proper circuit, works great. BTW, your previous post spoke of the importance of those coils to the circuit, but now in your latest post you state the circuit isnt the magic, the transformers are. Clearly we are both right to some extent! The old Mullard circuits similarly use a pentode (ef 86 as the first tube, then a dual triode for phase splitting duties, and can give excellent results as well. Sad thing is, these amps are getting very old. One must wonder how long these tranformers service life is. I similarly wonder about my Mc 225 in that regard. I have grown up surrounded by these pieces and plenty of NOS tubes. Even sadder, I guess I will see the day when these fine amps are crapping out. Already the nos tube suppliers are starting to run out. Maybe the transformers are more durable than I fear, I hope so. I dont know how having one rewound would come out, I am sure someone out there knows. Unfortunately, I have never owned an 8B, but know someone who did and spent time lusting after it. It was sold and I couldnt swing it. They also had a pair of the older mono block twos maybe? I cant remember. They were similar appearing to the 8B, but less tubes of course. The Mcintosh seems to be more rare than the macintosh stuff, just dont see much of it. Very attractive stuff.

Party on,

Russellc
 
Last edited:
"Yes the old tranformers are nice, but I dont know if they are the only source of the magic. An output transformer is probably one of the biggest weak points in a pushpull design..basically adesign compromise. A good transformer does as little damage as possible and logically isnt a source of magic in and of itself."


Doing as little damage as possible is the "magic". The quality of the winding in the Marantz iron along with those extra feedback winding are a big part of this. I don't need to try a clone, testing and listening a Marantz amplifier tells the story real quick IMHO.

Craig
 
NOSValves said:
"Yes the old tranformers are nice, but I dont know if they are the only source of the magic. An output transformer is probably one of the biggest weak points in a pushpull design..basically adesign compromise. A good transformer does as little damage as possible and logically isnt a source of magic in and of itself."


Doing as little damage as possible is the "magic". The quality of the winding in the Marantz iron along with those extra feedback winding are a big part of this. I don't need to try a clone, testing and listening a Marantz amplifier tells the story real quick IMHO.

Craig
I will then assume that you haven't tried such circuits in the manner I mentioned, which is precisely what I thought.

Russellc
 
I didn't even have to get half way through that article before I was ready to roll off the chair laughing. I think I counted 6 substancial changes made to the circuit by that time. Hardly a 8B replica.

Craig
 
jcmjrt said:
Interesting article. Have you heard one of these clones?
No I havent, but the plitron iron has interested me for sometime, as does the 6550 P-P amps that were in VTV mag a number of issues ago. The only experience I have with this sort of thing is as I stated in earlier post, with mcintosh circuits (MA 230) and reverse engineered transformers. there were probably more than 6 changes over this original amp, and it is definately audible.
The person whom did something along these lines was Steve at Angela Intruments, who thought quite highly of his result.

Russellc
 
NOSValves said:
I didn't even have to get half way through that article before I was ready to roll off the chair laughing. I think I counted 6 substancial changes made to the circuit by that time. Hardly a 8B replica.

Craig
Stumble on that on on the Plitron site. Steve's was the same circuit, with the exception of the feedback part in the output x-former. Yes its different than the original, and probably sonically different as well. Anything other than the original will of course be different. This ought to really crack you up: their intent was not to duplicate, but emulate. Part of the hobby. By the way, do you have an 8B did you say? I have owned several vintage pieces, but never any of the old tube Marantz gear. Some of the better looking stuff albeit "industrial" as well.

Russellc
 
Last edited:
Russellc said:
Stumble on that on on the Plitron site. Steve's was the same circuit, with the exception of the feedback part in the output x-former. Yes its different than the original, and probably sonically different as well. Anything other than the original will of course be different. This ought to really crack you up: their intent was not to duplicate, but emulate. Read the other half, go on sound out the big words and report back with any questions!

Russellc


I have no questions for your pompass ass so don't hold your breath.

Craig
 
NOSValves said:
I have no questions for your pompass ass so don't hold your breath.

Craig
Oh calm down, that was a little catty, so I did edit, also added an inquirey, I cant recall in all this banter, whether or not you are an 8b owner, or like myself, just had the fortunate experience of hearing others? I have had quite a few odds and ends of the Mcintosh tube stuff. Pompass ass....sounds funny if you say it over and over!
:deadhorse

Russellc
 
Wake up dude I work a tube audio gear for a living, every day. day in and day out. I hear, design and rebuild more tube audio equipment in a week then you most likely have heard in a year or more. I do not care for your snide remarks and I'm not one to put up with it. So now you know.

Do I own a 8B .... nope But I've rebuilt. tested and listened.

Craig
 
Last edited:
radioactive said:
hmm... interesting how a simple post of a review can turn into a very heated discussion. :headscrat
And Im the snide pompass ass! I know exactly who you are, so what?
Frankly I dont care how you feel. You are the one that keeps making snide remarks about others discussion on using that particular circuit. Then you resort to name calling. There is absolutely nothing to justify your childish whinning, just because youre impressed with yourself. calm down, youre just another voice, not the burning bush.
Russellc

Russellc
 
Last edited:
seems to me you should qoute the right person before posting. you should have seen my response to you :D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom