• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

McIntosh News!

Register to hide this ad
price range

mac for 2 channel audio is timeless. mac for home theater is nuts. it is not needed, too expensive, and cannot be upgraded. easy for me as i have two different systems on two floors. much harder for those of you who use one system for both.

peter
 
mac for 2 channel audio is timeless. mac for home theater is nuts. it is not needed, too expensive, and cannot be upgraded. easy for me as i have two different systems on two floors. much harder for those of you who use one system for both.

peter

McHomeTheater can be upgraded this way: You can trade your MX136 for the MX150 without having to change your amplification setup.
 
I don't think 3D is going to be a good fit for 99 percent of homeowners.

Funny, the same could be said for McIntosh. McIntosh gear is pricey. When it comes to two-channel audio, at least you can make a good argument (based on component durability and high resale value) that you're getting your money's worth. I don't see how you can make the same argument when it comes to home theater gear (other than perhaps amplification), and particularly with a format like Blu-Ray, which remains a work in progress.
 
McHomeTheater can be upgraded this way: You can trade your MX136 for the MX150 without having to change your amplification setup.
true, but for about 25% of the difference, i can get a denon, integra, or the like, and it will work better, if not as good. just not worth it in home theater. noise is noise. audio is much more subjective and sensitive.

peter
 
even though i have mcintosh for home theater and 2 chnl, mcintosh dose not make great sence for HT, they do NOT take trade ins on their procs like they do with their amps, and they are also slow to come out with new formats, plus they charge a arm and a leg for them. If its for HT, other then the amps, I would say save alot of your money, go with other brands that lead that area, and you can even upgrade.
The best bet if you want to stay american made is B&k, great stuff for HT sound, and Upgrade.
Like I said i spent twice as much to do a all mcintosh set up for 2chn and Ht and I am stuck with out being able to upgrade my proces. Though I did go for the esoteric in universal player because as much as i love mcintosh, they dont come close to a dv-60,

live it, learn it, and for gods sake save it
 
I don't want to say I told you so, but...two months ago, I put out a post about this, based on info from a Mac rep, and was roundly disbelieved and scoffed at, especially by Ron C, who called it "more fantasy." He was probably sworn to secrecy, though, so I don't blame him.

Anyway...who's buying one?

Glen
 
Not me. It makes sense for those who are attracted to the glass front panel and have the money to buy them, but not for me. I personally prefer Japanese electronics like Denon or Sony for fast evolving technologies like Blu-ray. There's a reason why McIntosh does not take non-power amp/preamp for their 75% trade in program.
 
McIntosoh MVP881BR - US$7,500

McIntoshMVP881BR.jpg


・BD-Live Profile 2.0 support
   ・On-board audio decoders for DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby TrueHD
   ・Multichannel analog outputs  
   ・Custom linear power supply
   ・Fully balanced 2-channel audio design
   ・32-bit/192kHz DACs
   ・1080p/24 and 60 frame output
   ・Backlit, learning IR remote
 
For people who are interested in McIntosh home theater on the (comparatively) cheap, they may want to consider pairing the MVP881BR (which has on-board decoding) with the C45 (which has two 5.1 inputs).
 
I was told by my dealer I'll get 75% for my MX-119 on the 150 and 75% on my 861 toward the 881. But I want to hear the 881 before I trade my 861 for the CD output. Does the 150 have a Pure Stereo analog like the 119 and 135... Hope so. TWI
 
Back
Top Bottom