Mr. Studio S
Member
thanks! at least I know the prices so I'll know if I'm getting taken for a ride the repair shop.
Dug up this old thread when I was looking into the M504 (one near me very cheap). I don't need it. but it sure is a good looking amp and I'm tempted.
How's your Onkyo combo treating you nowadays?
Send them both to me, and I'll restore them for you. If you don't like the sound after that, I'll trade them for a NAD pre/power combo.
Not being happy with something your wife or girlfriend buys you is tricky. I had a girlfriend once that bought me a Fisher turntable. It was shite, so I sold it to my cousin and bought an Ariston.
Lee.
Hey Onward!
First I'm seeing and read through the thread. Glad you got it sounding to your liking. I can imagine your disappointment upon the first listen. And especially when the gf made such an effort to please you!
Awesome crew here helping you out. It's surprising a mated system like this would sound so crappy. I'm sure the engineers spent a lot on R&D, yet it seems a lot of owners kept the amps and dumped the pre's.
Cheers, Glenn


@Gnesen I'm willing to bet that the fondness I once had for the loudness button, which I have since dispensed with, is the reason.
Apparently, the P304 is a respected piece, as well as the M504. Not top shelf, but no dog turds.
While my Aragon 18k pre has been my main preamp for 3 years now, I would not hesitate to reinsert the P304 into rotation. Might even do that today, just to keep the caps happy.
Which reminds me, I need to get both pieces to Leesonic. I got the jingle, I got the urge.
Can't be that far from Ky to NJ, can it??![]()
Nice. Please let us know if your P304 sounds any different than your recollection. And I’m thinking of recapping my pre and amp, though the special main filter caps on the M-504 are a little daunting. Leesonic would certainly be the safe way to go.
I found myself in the same boat trying too like that combination. I’m sure it shines when you kick up the volume but at low too medium volume,The preamp lack of adjustment besides bass & treble for lack of a better term, Falls flat. Fortunately my Sansui au-717 is in the same rack. Fabulous preamp with dedicated dual mono design has the M-504 sounding ridiculously beautiful, Great combination!! ( Infinity RS-4B speakers)
After reading the post that’s my next goal because I really like the combination look wise, To get the sound too match would be topping on the cake. Who do I send it too & whats the cost? In the meantime the Sansui matches up well.I realize I never replied to this - The P304/M504 is back in rotation, serving well on my Ohm Walsh 300 mk 2's.
The sound is lovely, crystal clear, and pleasant.
I cannot say this enough - get those Op-Amps changed. It made a difference. Some with greater technical knowledge than myself said it isn't in the signal path, but the difference was stark.
All that I know is that it sounds phenomenal with these Ohms.
@E-Stat would be proud!I realize I never replied to this - The P304/M504 is back in rotation, serving well on my Ohm Walsh 300 mk 2's.
The sound is lovely, crystal clear, and pleasant.
I cannot say this enough - get those Op-Amps changed. It made a difference. Some with greater technical knowledge than myself said it isn't in the signal path, but the difference was stark.
All that I know is that it sounds phenomenal with these Ohms.
After reading the post that’s my next goal because I really like the combination look wise, To get the sound too match would be topping on the cake. Who do I send it too & whats the cost? In the meantime the Sansui matches up well.
The Mitsu 5218A has pretty poor noise, THD and slew rate specs. Not surprised at all how that could be bettered.@E-Stat would be proud!
The Mitsu 5218A has pretty poor noise, THD and slew rate specs. Not surprised at all how that could be bettered.![]()