• Check out the Annual AK Secret Santa exchange Program, signup before November 23rd in the AK Charities & Christmas forum!

Open Baffle Epiphany!

The thing I don't understand is the plethora of designs in all shapes and sizes. Some with huge baffles, some with small baffles and some with no baffles at all. These are often the work of ordinary people giving OB a try without regard to measurements yet they love what they're hearing. The 8 year running of the "Dark Star" thread on AC forum is an example of this. These home spun OB's may be compromised in terms of hump or smooth and extended SPL yet it is often the best sound their builders have ever heard. I know how my first OB's thrashed the Zu's and all I did was copy your design without regard to using a different driver.

The different sizes and shapes (what I commonly refer to as the cult of the narrow baffle) represent different design trade-offs. Each require different crossover points and sometimes significant amounts of EQ below the baffle's dipole hump. There are excellent sounding examples for all of these trade-offs. Some people take a fanatical position that there trade-off is the best and only true dipole speaker (the narrow baffle people in particular). It is no different from box loaded speakers, sealed or bass reflex or TL or horns each has their own vocal advocates and represent different design trade-offs. Some sound good and some do not, but try telling a new mother that her child is not the best in the world.
 
MJK,

So would you agree with Linkwtiz that it's hard to screw up an open baffle speaker to where it sounds worse than a box speaker?
 
Last edited:
So would you agree with Linkwtiz that it hard to screw up an open baffle speaker to where it sounds worse than a box speaker?

You can screw up an OB speaker, but maybe it is easier to correct with an active crossover. If you mess up the alignment in a boxed speaker the bass is going to be boomy or non existent depending on which way things go, maybe not so easy to fix. In both an OB and a boxed speaker where a crossover is required they are equally easy to screw up.

Remember Linkwitz represents one of the design trade-offs, narrow baffles requiring a three or four way design with active crossovers and heavy EQ. The stated benefit to his approach is a perfect figure "8" radiation pattern. His approach is different from the wider baffle designs with offset drivers typically seen in this thread. Not right or wrong, just different sets of trade-offs.
 
What are the issues when using traditional sub designs with OB speakers? I get the impression they don't play well together but I'm not sure why.

cubdog
 
What are the issues when using traditional sub designs with OB speakers? I get the impression they don't play well together but I'm not sure why.

cubdog

I doubt that would be an issue as long as the sub can keep up with the speed and attack of the mains.
 
Monopole subwoofers do just fine with dipole speakers. Outside of planar a and electrostatics, I'm not sure there are speed/attack advantages to dipoles.
 
What are the issues when using traditional sub designs with OB speakers? I get the impression they don't play well together but I'm not sure why.

cubdog

OB bass is interestingly different. Once you've lived with it for a while, you can usually identify a different character anytime you're back around a boxed affair.

To mate a seperate sub down low is possible, but like all subs, it's not necessarily easy. The open sound of the higher bass may stand out if what you augment with is too boomy or has a "slow" sound to it.

Sealed bass, IMHO, can do it. It's up to you if what you have to work with feels like it fits or not to your ear. But it takes quite an effort to get very low with OB and something augmenting the really low shouldn't be shunned if the music you listen to has that. Or it's important to you.

EV3
 
I'm starting to believe many who complain about "slow bass" are simply hearing one of the limitations of a single sub or the limitations of limited placement options for multiples (though the design can contribute to response/speed as well). I had a pair of sealed subs flanking some Maggies and thought they were doing a pretty good job integrating until I built some H-frames and paired those with the Maggies. All of a sudden the sealed subs seemed clumsy and the H-frames spritely and "on it". Those same sealed subs are now placed on my rear wall as part of a four sub unit distributed bass system and are right there, step for step, with my Altec 19's....which I think have great speed in the mid and upper bass region.

I like OB bass and am fixing to dive back in with four AE IB15's to explore the concept further, but I'm not about to jump on the "boxed subs are all slow" bandwagon. You get enough good ones working together to combat the room's influence and they can break their chains.
 
Personally I design everything before I buy drivers, wood, or make any cuts. I calculate the SPL response and the crossover details (active settings or passive component values) before I do anything else. I have it all designed and predicted then I start accumulating parts and assembling the system. It is very rare that I make any significant adjustments after the fact, measurements usually confirm the predictions within the accuracy of the models. I am a mechanical engineer and this is what I have been doing for a living the past 35 years, but on different consumer products.

So that means a guy like me slaps it in the baffle with a little offset, measures and starts asking guys like you for help. :)
 
Wild Burros, Pigs, Chickens, OB's and a King....

Hey guys, great thread so far so I guess I'll join in. I'm thinking of trying an OB using a old Magnavox 15" out of a S073 speaker along with a 7" full range driver oul of an old Magnavox 6bq5 tube record player. Probably an H frame for the 15" and panel for the 7". I will probably order the Behringer CX2310.

If it works out I will go with some quality drivers, I am just not happy with box speakers anymore and looking for something different.

My one issue is that I will not be able to get as far from the front wall as most folks here have recommended. I have only 20 or so inches from the front wall and 24 inches between the side wall and an 8' desk on a 12' walls to work with. An way to make this work?
 

Attachments

  • $_14.jpg
    $_14.jpg
    1.3 KB · Views: 139
  • 71924-vintage_magnavox_s073_speakers_horn_tweeter_15_woofer.jpg
    71924-vintage_magnavox_s073_speakers_horn_tweeter_15_woofer.jpg
    62.3 KB · Views: 45
Last edited:
I would answer that it won't be "broken" or anything at that distance. But it also won't image near as well as it would out further.

Make some baffles, even if cardboard, and listen and see what you think. Pull them out temporarily and listen to the difference and see what it sounds like to you in your room. Your listening habits might not be to sit in the sweet spot and so imaging may not matter so much for you for instance.

Those sound like some fun drivers to listen to for a first go in any case. Try to get that 7" up to a height where the center is at ear height and then play around and listen! :music:
 
Tomlinmgt, you want the Dipole 15s, not the IB15s.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, I know....not optimum. But I got an incredible deal on these (like, not much more than new Alpha 15's....and I believe a wise man once said never pass up a working AE driver for just a little more than the cost of an Eminence) so Im gonna try 'em out. There are a few out there doing OB duty rather successfully, so Im gonna see what they'll do. If they don't do so hot I'll try 'em in something else, maybe a few ripole subs.

- Michael
 
Last edited:
After my first giant folding wing OB's ( with the Betsy single drivers ) I built these which also use the Betsy plus Eminence Alphas.

That's when I got real serious with this whole open baffle thing. So serous I couldn't justify the Omens any longer which to me didn't sound as good. I sold the Zu's cause they were collecting dust.

The Betsy/Alpha is a simple build with just a piece of flat plywood. I ran the Betsy's full tilt with a Miniwatt SET and a Dayton amp with built in crossover to drive the Alphas. This picture shows a low pass crossover used to filter out the HF which allows use of any 50 watt or higher ss amp. This OB is based on MJK's with a few changes.

picture.php

Poultry, how many watts was your Dayton amp you used to drive the Alphas? I am looking to basically build these same OB's but us Goldwood GW-410D 10" instead, I would really like 2 of them stacked below the Betsy.
 
Poultry, how many watts was your Dayton amp you used to drive the Alphas? I am looking to basically build these same OB's but us Goldwood GW-410D 10" instead, I would really like 2 of them stacked below the Betsy.

I've driven the two Alphas with several different amps. I used two Dayton APA-150's bridged which was about 75-100 wpc, and an older Denon AVR of about the same power.

When driving 2 Alphas per side in parallel my best choice has been a single Yung SD200 ( 200 wpc into 4 ohms ) plate amp. I've used a single Yung SD300 which is a little too much power.

I'm not sure how one Dayton APA150 would perform driving four Alphas in parallel. It could work? But one wasn't enough for two Alphas but that was into 8 ohms.
 
Back
Top Bottom