petehall347
the brandy coffee man
i see the 780 AC supply to pin 7 starting off higher than the 980 so i give up .. end of the day pin 7 needs nice AC by the looks of it .
AFAIK yes.one thing stuck with me .its when you removed r12 the relay behaved .. its just with r12 being connected to ground that made me wonder about this . i couldn't see why or how that could make a difference ..
p.s @markthefixer are the 1 meg resistors correct values in the 780 schem ?
With R11 bypassed and R12 removed, the cycling stopped with the relay closed (pulled in). Also, FWIW, I haven't looked to see what an SX-5580 (European equivalent of an SX-1050) uses in its protection circuit, but I had mine in the shop shortly before the SX-980, and it behaved normally.Looks like the PA3004 pin 7 is high impedance and only a few microamps are needed to trigger to 'AC present' condition. High impedance would make it more sensitive to noise. With 18vac on the supply side of the SX-980 R 8 the PA3004 pin 7 would have about 38 microamps flowing, and the signal would 'clip' at +/- ~ one PN junction voltage, exactly like MTF indicates above (post 253). And PN junctions are not linear.
A small symmetrical AC signal would look like 0v to a DC setting on a DMM.
When the cycling stopped was the relay open or closed (released or pulled in)?
I guess 0v at pin 7 of the PA3004 is technically correct, if only for a few seconds but, as MTF pointed out, it is misleading. If the individual outline of the PA3004 is correct, that helps. Luckily, in the SX-980 schematic, the voltages are correct in both places.9 hours and still going. I think I'll stash it back in the rack since the grandkids are showing up tomorrow. They are disciplined well enough to avoid tampering with aything in my work area, but a receiver sitting in their play room might be fair game.
Regarding the presence of AC at PA3004, what little I know is that the schematics I have indicate 0.75VAC at Pin 7. Look within the outline of the PA3004 itself:
![]()
Makes me wonder what other kind of silly issues we're having that I'm not aware of. Next time I see one of the Maintenance fellas, I'll ask.And people wonder why critical systems still use 4-20mA loops for process signals instead of ethernet I/P as seems to be preferred by those not working in critical systems. For example, there are no I/P instruments (nor PLC or even PC control) in power generating stations, combustion systems, refining PIDs, or at least not in the critical processes. There are lots of examples of those in support systems like HVAC, building security, utilities, data collection, etc, but not in the critical processes. There is an increasing noise threshold in lots of systems and equipment, and it is NOT getting any better. 40+ years ago electrical engineers probably expected that things would get better, not worse, but they probably never anticipated the accountants and MBAs running everything.
pin 4 is overcurrent detect for both channels . you need to isolate which channel the voltage is coming from .I am new to this, I am a retired electrics tech. I am troubleshooting a SX-980. All the voltages appear to be good, The amp bias and current are set and correct. The protection relay does not energize unless Pin 4 on the protection board is disconnected. The wire from pin 2 on the amp boards is very low .003 vdc. The number 4 pin on the PB is 13.35 vdc. When i connect the wire to pin 4 on the PB it releases the relay.
