• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Realistic Minimus 7 ID Thread

Forty lashes with a wet noodle. :D

That makes sense, since much of the fiberglass I've seen *is* denser than the polyfill, so "smushing" the polyfill in there probably equaled the fiberglass's density. And ultimately, if the speaker sounds right, that's what matters in the end.

Yes, thank you. I like the sound. And I promise to take the lashes later today.
 
I would think that is pretty early. Did you buy them new? What color? Are the drivers labeled Japan?

picked them up at a garage sale for $5. The drivers do say Japan on them. And they are black, with the spring loaded clips....

There really is no crossover in them. Just a cap for the tweeter. The woofer gets full range.....

What sucked was one of the magnets was separated from the tweeter. I wrapped up a postcard around the center pole to center it, re glued, and works great.
 
BTW Radio Shack did sell separately the same woofer (as far as I can tell) the 7 used, all the way up to the late 90s.

For example, 1997 RS catalog, page 101....Fig. 7 (that can't be a coincidence!).

Its a different driver though similar. Minimus 7 woofer cones never had circumferential ribs on the cone. The ceramic magnet looks a little thinner than a Minimus 7 woofer too.
 
Interesting thread. I recently picked up a pair of Minimus 7s at a Goodwill Outlet store for $5. Since this is the place where everything gets tossed indiscriminately into huge bins, the tough metal construction of these speakers (especially the grill) was a real asset. Most speakers that show up in the bins get completely destroyed in short order.

These are 40-2030As with white woofers and consecutive serial numbers 07076 and 07077. I take it these are pretty early models? They sound great despite being a little rough cosmetically. Terrific little garage speakers and a huge upgrade from the Audiosource LS .5s I had used for years.
 
I was just given a pair of Minimus 7 speakers. They have black metal cabs, black metal mesh covers. Model 40-2030C, serial numbers 7669 and 7676. Both labeled QC 11 A 8. White woofer cones. Sound great!
 
I found a set of 7Ws today at my (now) favorite thrift store, the one where they toss stuff into recycling bins, and I have made friends with the warehouse manager. It rained for a week straight here in SoCal, and these bins were full of a bunch of wet, effed up crap, but I managed to pull these sweethearts out, and the Mgr. said "take em" Cat. no. 40-2039C, don't know serial numbers, one has a blown woofer, ordered last one available on Ebay (right now). The one that works sounds pretty nice for free. :music:

SAM_0113.jpg
 
I realize that this is an older thread, but the nature of the OP suggests that it continue on.

In that regard, I snapped up four Minimus-7W yesterday off CL for $25.

The Minimus-7W speakers have the same design as the original Minimus-7, but with genuine oiled walnut finish and a removable cloth grill. The 7W debuted in the Radio Shack Catalogs in 1985 [1]. They have a Long-Excursion 4” Woofer and a 1” Soft-Dome Tweeter. The 1985 catalog lists the size as 8x5x4” with a price of $49.95.

The back labels are silver with black lettering as follows:

REALISTIC
MINIMUS-7W CAT.NO. 40-2039A
INPUT 8 OHMS 40W (MAX.)
CUSTOM MFD. IN JAPAN FOR RADIO SHACK
A DIVISION OF TANDY CORPORATION
- +

The “QC“ labels are as follows:

QC........ QC........ QC......... QC
NO. 57.. NO. 59.. NO. 793.. NO. 9xy
12A6.... 12A6..... 12A6...... 12A6

The QC label for 9xy is ripped such that the numbers to the right of “9” are unreadable.

I performed a Stereo Polarity Sound Test [2] with 59 on the right channel and 57, 793, and 9xy on the left channel.
1. 57 is out of phase with 59.
2. 793 is in phase with 59.
3. 9xy is in phase with 59.
4. When the speaker leads to 57 are reversed, 57 is in phase with 59.

All four seem to work well and sound pretty good. The woofers and the tweeters in all four speakers seem to work and pass the Low Frequency Response and Subwoofer Test [3] and the High Frequency Response and High Pitch Hearing Test [4]. It seems that I can hear the 19 KHz pitch better than the 18, 17, 16, and 15 KHz pitches. I cannot hear the 22, 21, 20, 18, 17, 16, and 15 KHz pitches. I do hear the 14 KHz and below pitches.

References
[1] http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/catalogs/1985/, page 21.

[2] Stereo Polarity Sound Test. http://www.audiocheck.net/audiotests_polaritycheck.php

[3] Low Frequency Response and Subwoofer Test. http://www.audiocheck.net/audiotests_frequencychecklow.php

[4] High Frequency Response and High Pitch Hearing Test http://www.audiocheck.net/audiotests_frequencycheckhigh.php
 
Thanks for posting and, yes, I do want it to live on. Interesting about the phase. I'll bet there has been someone inside the #57 since it is a different phase than the others.

I also appreciate the link. I thought I remembered that the W model cost $10 more. Not true in the 1985 catalog.
 
Last edited:
I realize that this is an older thread, but the nature of the OP suggests that it continue on.

In that regard, I snapped up four Minimus-7W yesterday off CL for $25.

The Minimus-7W speakers have the same design as the original Minimus-7, but with genuine oiled walnut finish and a removable cloth grill. The 7W debuted in the Radio Shack Catalogs in 1985 [1]. They have a Long-Excursion 4” Woofer and a 1” Soft-Dome Tweeter. The 1985 catalog lists the size as 8x5x4” with a price of $49.95.

The back labels are silver with black lettering as follows:

REALISTIC
MINIMUS-7W CAT.NO. 40-2039A
INPUT 8 OHMS 40W (MAX.)
CUSTOM MFD. IN JAPAN FOR RADIO SHACK
A DIVISION OF TANDY CORPORATION
- +

The “QC“ labels are as follows:

QC........ QC........ QC......... QC
NO. 57.. NO. 59.. NO. 793.. NO. 9xy
12A6.... 12A6..... 12A6...... 12A6

The QC label for 9xy is ripped such that the numbers to the right of “9” are unreadable.

I performed a Stereo Polarity Sound Test [2] with 59 on the right channel and 57, 793, and 9xy on the left channel.
1. 57 is out of phase with 59.
2. 793 is in phase with 59.
3. 9xy is in phase with 59.
4. When the speaker leads to 57 are reversed, 57 is in phase with 59.

All four seem to work well and sound pretty good. The woofers and the tweeters in all four speakers seem to work and pass the Low Frequency Response and Subwoofer Test [3] and the High Frequency Response and High Pitch Hearing Test [4]. It seems that I can hear the 19 KHz pitch better than the 18, 17, 16, and 15 KHz pitches. I cannot hear the 22, 21, 20, 18, 17, 16, and 15 KHz pitches. I do hear the 14 KHz and below pitches.

References
[1] http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/catalogs/1985/, page 21.

[2] Stereo Polarity Sound Test. http://www.audiocheck.net/audiotests_polaritycheck.php

[3] Low Frequency Response and Subwoofer Test. http://www.audiocheck.net/audiotests_frequencychecklow.php

[4] High Frequency Response and High Pitch Hearing Test http://www.audiocheck.net/audiotests_frequencycheckhigh.php
Cool links. If I recall the date codes correctly looks like Dec-86.
 
The 7W debuted in the Radio Shack Catalogs in 1985 [1]. They have a Long-Excursion 4” Woofer and a 1” Soft-Dome Tweeter. The 1985 catalog lists the size as 8x5x4” with a price of $49.95.

Good info!

Note that 7W actually debuted in the 1983 catalog (pg. 24). Rear labels on those read "CAT. NO. 40-2039" with no letter suffix.

These first 7Ws did cost $10 more than their aluminum siblings. They also seem to have front baffles with oiled walnut veneer just like the sides, as evidenced by auction photos I've seen and this pic sans grille from a German Tandy catalog.

It could be Radio Shack dropped the costlier veneered baffle in '85 to launch "A" suffix 7Ws at the reduced price of $49.95, matching aluminum M7s. But that's pure speculation on my part.
 
Good info!

Note that 7W actually debuted in the 1983 catalog (pg. 24). Rear labels on those read "CAT. NO. 40-2039" with no letter suffix.

These first 7Ws did cost $10 more than their aluminum siblings. They also seem to have front baffles with oiled walnut veneer just like the sides, as evidenced by auction photos I've seen and this pic sans grille from a German Tandy catalog.

It could be Radio Shack dropped the costlier veneered baffle in '85 to launch "A" suffix 7Ws at the reduced price of $49.95, matching aluminum M7s. But that's pure speculation on my part.
Virtually all RS products garnered a suffix when any mod was made, no matter how small (though usually not small). Example was Mach One's. 40-4024 was the first year only, had finished bottoms. Subsequent model 40-4024a had painted bottoms. By most/all accounts all other components were identical, same part numbers, etc. Oh, first year had lifetime warranty, where all latter Mach's came with 5 year.
 
Hey, So I need help identifying the year of my minimus 7s
I have the Realistic Minimus 7 40-2034A [Silver] "9A8"
and the Realistic Minimus 7 40-2030C [Black] " 6A9"

Is there anyway to figure out the age of my Minimus 7?
 
Good info!

Note that 7W actually debuted in the 1983 catalog (pg. 24). Rear labels on those read "CAT. NO. 40-2039" with no letter suffix.

These first 7Ws did cost $10 more than their aluminum siblings. They also seem to have front baffles with oiled walnut veneer just like the sides, as evidenced by auction photos I've seen and this pic sans grille from a German Tandy catalog.

It could be Radio Shack dropped the costlier veneered baffle in '85 to launch "A" suffix 7Ws at the reduced price of $49.95, matching aluminum M7s. But that's pure speculation on my part.
Oops, shoulda done my homework. I took my information from post #6 in this thread by mhardy6647. He also states the 7W is "not in the 1984 catalog", but I see it on page 21 in the upper right corner.

The black (40-2030) and silver (40-2034) versions are in the '82, '83, '84, and '85 catalogs on pages 26, 24, 21, and 21 for $49.95.

The walnut veneer (40-2039) version is in the '83, and '84 catalogs on pages 24, and 21 for $59.95 and in the '85 catalog on page 21 for $49.95.

The Minimus-7W is listed as "NEW FOR '83" in the 1983 catalog. I did not see it in the 1982 catalog.
 
Last edited:
Oops, shoulda done my homework. I took my information from post #6 in this thread by mhardy6647. He also states the 7W is "not in the 1984 catalog", but I see it on page 21 in the upper right corner.

The black (40-2030) and silver (40-2034) versions are in the '82, '83, '84, and '85 catalogs on pages 26, 24, 21, and 21 for $49.95.

The walnut veneer (40-2039) version is in the '83, and '84 catalogs on pages 24, and 21 for $59.95 and in the '85 catalog on page 21 for $49.95.

The Minimus-7W is listed as "NEW FOR '83" in the 1983 catalog. I did not see it in the 1982 catalog.
Do keep in mind the catalogs come out in the latter part of the year, before holiday shopping is in full swing. So a speaker in the "83" catalog could have been released before the end of the calender "82" year. So you can have an 82 date code for a product introduced in the 83 catalog.
 
Hey, So I need help identifying the year of my minimus 7s
I have the Realistic Minimus 7 40-2034A [Silver] "9A8"
and the Realistic Minimus 7 40-2030C [Black] " 6A9"

Is there anyway to figure out the age of my Minimus 7?
Should be Sep88 and Jun89 respectively. Keep in mind non-black models will have lower suffix letters due to their being introduced after the black and having incorporated the "current" parts used in the black model for the same manufacturing period. So while they share the same parts, they were introduced later and have a lower suffix.
 
Should be Sep88 and Jun89 respectively. Keep in mind non-black models will have lower suffix letters due to their being introduced after the black and having incorporated the "current" parts used in the black model for the same manufacturing period. So while they share the same parts, they were introduced later and have a lower suffix.

Alrighty, Thanks...lol wasn't expecting that lol! but still I love them :)
 
Back
Top Bottom