• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Really interesting article on the Shure M44-7

Register to hide this ad
The M44-7 is a fun cartridge. Thanks for posting the article. The most interesting part of the article for me is the description of the suspension system, which is often overlooked in discussions about cartridges and styli. It's just as important as stylus shape and cantilever material.
 
Last edited:
Reminded me of a post I made on another forum several years ago. I had been interested in the M44 series and went to the library to go through old High Fidelity ads to see its history. Below is a cut-and-paste from that post:

Has any product gone from top-of-the-line to also-ran as quickly as the Shure M44 series cartridge? In looking at older issues of High Fidelity yesterday, I found that the M44 (the first Shure designed to track at 15 degrees) replaced the M33 as top dog in their advertising in the Dec. '63 issue. Priced at $49.50 (.5 mil stylus, .75-1.5 VTF) or $44.50 (.7 mil, 1.5-3.0), it was lauded as "awesome in its vitality and clarity," "a night-and-day difference," and "the new standard in distortion-free hi-fi cartridges." By April of '64, the Shure V-15, with its elliptical stylus, was introduced, relegating the M44 to second-tier status. In September of '64, the M44 was being advertised as the modestly-priced alternative to the "professional grade" M55E and V-15, and the price had dropped to less than $25.00. And now, 40 years later, it's said to be engineered for DJ's and turntablists. But we should not forget that this was once the flagship of the Shure line, an audiophile's dream, even if only for a few months.

Now it's over 50 years since its introduction and still going strong, hopefully for a long time to come.
 
Last edited:
I have an M44E with a good original stylus which I enjoy on a dual TT. Are all M44 bodies the same? Can I use a "7" stylus in my cartridge? It looks the only difference is that the E is eliptical and the 7 spherical. The other specs appear the same.

Thanks,

John
 
Last edited:
Yes, either the N44-7 or the lighter-tacking N44G will fit and work properly with your cartridge body.
 
Thanks. I didn't notice the tracking force difference. Looks like the "G" might be the way to go for LPs.

I was using the M44 with the appropriate stylus for playing 78s. I dismantled my mono system and sold the 78s then discovered how nice the cartridge sounds when playing LPs. Might be worth investing in a new stylus.
 
Thanks. I didn't notice the tracking force difference. Looks like the "G" might be the way to go for LPs.

I was using the M44 with the appropriate stylus for playing 78s. I dismantled my mono system and sold the 78s then discovered how nice the cartridge sounds when playing LPs. Might be worth investing in a new stylus.

I found that the M44G doesn't do well in a medium mass tonearm, probably works best in a high quality low mass tone-arm.
 
Very interesting article, I just got done playing some 78s with my M44-7 on a Dual 1019. Great combo!
 
Good article, thanks. Sounds like they've been made in Mexico for quite a long time.

I only wish the EVG stylus for my M55E was better. Has anyone tried the Pfanstiehl 4759-DE?
 
That looks exactly like what I have, which is an EVG, supposedly made by Jico. But there's no way to really know since the Jico site lists no specs.

EVG may source some of their styli from JICO, but they are not the same as those available through JICO's website. I have about a dozen JICO styli and several EVG & Pfanstiehl. JICO are built just like the originals, EVG & Pfanstiehl are not.
 
The jukebox expert isn't much of an expert, the Seeburg G used a Pickering Cartridge and Stylus (as all Seeburgs did from 1949 to the end), not an Astatic.
 
Back
Top Bottom