pustelniakr; Perhaps I should have said 'remarkably similar' to the mk2; in operation modes without splitting hairs? (pg 23 of the pdf file) Yes I understand the pita positioning of the screw to get the sensor 'windows' to hit on target. However erratic tone arm could also be other issues if the cpu or controller chippy isn't reset. there are logic sequences for the motor to be directed in forward or reverse. In the mk2 I had to order a logic chippy (non inverting buffer) from china to correct the motor sequence while others were telling me to recap. saved a large chunk of change$.

yay!
btw.. the belt? believe me it's manufactured the same as an o-ring if the 'belt' is round.. so I save another few bucks on that without the b.s. shipping.
Instant on? lets take all the caps out of the boards and see how instant on it is?
Remarkably similar? Not likely. Similar in some respects? Maybe. Material to this discussion? Meh.
This thread was created to show how to restore a PL-630 without cutting corners or using arbitrary substitutions. It is not about saving a few bucks. Folks can certainly do as they wish with their own gear. Folks with other ideas on keeping their equipment running are free to create threads to tell others how they can follow suit. This thread is made a sticky in the Pioneer restoration database, because it works to keep the gear running as close to original specs as possible, and in as close to original condition as possible. It is NOT intended as a normal discussion thread.
The belt is NOT an o-ring, Belts and o-rings are designed for different purposes, out of different materials. The belt is a square belt, and the pulleys are designed for it. The proper belt is important. If too tight, you risk burning up the tiny motor, or damaging its bushings through excessive wear. If too loose, the belt will slip, leading to inaccurate stylus positioning or erratic tonearm movement. If too stretchy (as some kind of o-ring would be), again, inaccurate stylus positioning and erratic tonearm motion. Round cross-section belts have little more than tangential contact points with pulleys designed for square cross-sections. Therefore, there is greater risk of slippage, unless the belt is tighter (smaller). Stretched belts (to get the tightness needed for wrong belts or "o-rings") dry out and age faster. Enough said about the belt. The correct ones are just too easy to obtain to worry about kludging.
There are no chips that need resetting, anywhere in the PL-630. The controls are all state machines (combinatorial logic and timing circuits), where the outputs are directly and immediately determined by the inputs. There are no CPUs in there. I have the datasheets on all of the chips, as well as their implementation and design documents.
As for taking out all of the caps...that is just foolish jesting.
I tell people NOT to recap, until a unit is fully functional. So, I do not encourage people to waste money that could be saved.
As for the chips in the unit, they are all proprietary Pioneer chips, seen only in their turntables, and a couple of their cassette decks. Anything out of China will be unfortunate counterfeits. New, replacement chips are not currently being manufactured. I could design replacements, but the non-repetitive engineering costs would be prohibitive. Need a "chippy?" You need a parts unit, or a part from someone's secret NOS collection, period.
These tables are one of my specialties. They have been for decades. I am a design engineer with over 3 decades of experience. I "know" what I am talking about. Yes, there are myriads of potential causes for various symptoms. However, given any set of symptoms, there are likely causes. I can be trusted to give them.
There is no need to begin bouncing around the room, and entering in spitting contests. If you just want to dispute with me, create a disputing thread and we can go at it there. Lets not muddy up the waters in this thread. In this thread, encouraging kludge techniques will always be resisted by me, and muddying posts are in danger of deletion.
Rich P