After hearing Bob T’s Half Chang (designed by Scottmoose) w/ Fostex FE206e drivers, I decided I would have to build a pair for our daughter and son-in-law. I started early last Nov. w/ intention of having them ready for Christmas. Well.... Just yesterday I popped in the FE206e drivers and achieved ‘first sound’. (I did break-in the drivers back in Dec. running them on open baffles for 250 hrs.) I didn’t really stand a chance of finishing them by Christmas, but had hoped to get them done in Jan. What with vacation, holidays, and some actual work, it took me longer than I had expected.
I built the box as drawn by Dave (of Planet-10 HiFi,) except that I made the front baffle double thick. This makes a front piece that sticks out more than the wave guide (vestigial horn?) below and makes the panel full-width on the front face. Since Kate wanted it all in wood finish, I wanted to adjust the look slightly w/o changing the interior dimensions of the box. Frankly, I like Bob’s two tone black & wood finish better.
On the inside, I covered the top, back and one side w/ egg-crate acoustic foam from Parts Express. Since the kids won’t be changing the BSC, I’ll put it inside on the vertical driver brace. At the moment I’m using a 1 mH inductor and 5 ohm resistor. I haven’t gotten to any driver mods yet, like filling the gap around the driver magnets--need to get down to the store for some duct seal.
Picture below shows the driver bare, but since the grand kids are young, a grill is necessary. The next picture shows how the grill will be. It’s a metal cooling rack which will be covered w/ black grill cloth. I have to get my wife to do the sewing part. The grill is held on w/ magnets which are embedded in the baffle underneath veneer.
The finish needs some work yet, as I had some runs in the clear coat--a result of trying to work on it in the basement under poor lighting. When I am done w/ sound tests and ready to install the BSC on the interior, I will pull the drivers, sand, and then try again w/ the semigloss finish.
The sound is quite good. Everything is crisp & clear, the sound stage is broad & deep, and imaging is good--I think, but I have never been able to localize things the way some people do, so I can’t be certain about that. Bass extends to the low 30’s, but it tapers off starting at about 50 Hz. This is in contrast to the way my Metronomes work. The Mets w/ FE108e Sigma are pretty much flat to 40 Hz, then the response drops like a rock. The tapering bass is what I see in the theoretical response models, so I assume the cabinet is OK. The only thing that might be wrong is that I had a dimensional problem w/ the vent, causing it to be almost 1/16” too wide. I did ask about that, and Scottmoose said that room effects would be more significant than that. Also, Scott reminded me that the box was designed for the FE207e, which has a bit more low end grunt, so what I am getting is ‘as expected.’ (Actually, Kate & Peter may thank me for that feature when their kids get a little older!) If they want more bass, then a small sub will fill in nicely. I have tried the HCs w/ my little Polk PSW-10, and it blends well enough for me.
In summary, the HCs have more bass extension than the Mets (w/ FE108Esig) and HCs can play much louder. Sound stage is about the same as the Mets, but the Mets have something in the midrange that I like better. It could just be the cabinet and BSC tuning, or, it may be that the folks who argue for the 4-5” drivers as the sweet spot for single driver speakers are right. At this point, if I had to choose between the HCs and the Mets w/ a sub, I’d stick w/ the Mets for my listening rooms (approx. 14x16 ft.) The kids’ family room is about 16x20’, so for them the Mets would have been too small, and the HCs are just right.:thmbsp:
Next up: a little sub to match the Mets. Then I’ll have to decide between a pair of FE126 bipole Mets and MJK’s small OB.