lebrun53
New Member
When a TA-1150 Sony integrated amp was brought to my bench with a dead phono circuit,
I needed to find a solution to the unobtanium CX-0461 chip.
Here is what worked for me.
Remove the bad CX-0461 and install a 14 pin DIP socket.
Build a small daughter board with pins long enough to clear the tallest cap under the board (5/8" to 3/4").
I used 2x OPA604 op-amps as replacements.



notes:
OPA604 is a single op-amp but,
OPA2604 (dual OPA604) could be an option too if you can find them. (no longer available at Digi-Key)
The height off the socket could possibly introduce some interference,
but with the cover installed on the TA-1150, I heard none.
Not shown in the pcb drawing is a .1uF film cap across pins 1 and 14.
The CX-0461 is also used in Sony's STR-7055 and STR-7065 units.
I did not try this solution in either of those other Sony units but I expect it would work there as well.
The CX-0462 chip is very close to the CX-0461 and I think this design would work there as well (not tested).
Larry
--- usual disclaimer - no promises that this will work in your application ---
I needed to find a solution to the unobtanium CX-0461 chip.
Here is what worked for me.
Remove the bad CX-0461 and install a 14 pin DIP socket.
Build a small daughter board with pins long enough to clear the tallest cap under the board (5/8" to 3/4").
I used 2x OPA604 op-amps as replacements.



notes:
OPA604 is a single op-amp but,
OPA2604 (dual OPA604) could be an option too if you can find them. (no longer available at Digi-Key)
The height off the socket could possibly introduce some interference,
but with the cover installed on the TA-1150, I heard none.
Not shown in the pcb drawing is a .1uF film cap across pins 1 and 14.
The CX-0461 is also used in Sony's STR-7055 and STR-7065 units.
I did not try this solution in either of those other Sony units but I expect it would work there as well.
The CX-0462 chip is very close to the CX-0461 and I think this design would work there as well (not tested).
Larry
--- usual disclaimer - no promises that this will work in your application ---
Last edited:


