Wrong! Your Denon and your Sony are overrated. And are less precise than a better Technics. The SP-10 is heavier duty, better built and made, more precise every day. Built to withstand up to 18 hour a day use which kills Denons. Styling don't play records.
High performance and consistent reliability does the job. Complexity is not reliability, nor does it assure accuracy.
Simplicity doesn't assure accuracy either. Often you need complexity for accuracy. Take a look at the circuitry of a SP-10MK3, it is anything but simple.
Any direct drive turntable from the 70s or 80s, if it pretends to work optimally, needs recalibration and maybe even a full replacement of capacitors. This will be needed notwithstanding the fact that the turntable is working from the get go or not.
I have a Technics SL-1300. (...) Cleaned the automatic mechanism up. Expected problems. Connected it up. Installed a head shell and cartridge. Set it up carefully. It worked, rotated on speed without a care in the world.
And thus, you have not went through a real service for your turntable. Your SL-1300 works, but not necessarily up to the factory standards.
Returning to the SP-10MK3, the pinnacle of Technics "high performance and consistent reliability":
There are 10 PCBs, 10 (ten) printed circuit boards.
It has 20 (twenty) ICs from and all of them are custom (and thus, not so easy or cheap to source) Mastushita ICs.
But let's go back to your claim:
Complexity is not reliability, nor does it assure accuracy.
So, I guess the SP-10MK3 is not a reliable turntable then? Or is it?
If the SP-10MK3 (or the MK2 which also has a certain complexity) is reliable, then will you have the will to tell me that comparable turntables from Sony. I mean, SONY,
- a direct competitor to Matsushita
- a company that introduced some of the first transistors and ICs in japan
- which also had not just capability to manufacture their own ICs in the 70s
- and to invent new devices like the VFET)
- fully dedicated to audio and video unlike Matsushita
... can't make reliable turntables?
You are putting ALL Sony and Denon DD turntables in the same basket, so let me do the same for Technics DD turntables, and comment that in my country the amount of Technics DD turntables with failed ICs like the AN630 or AN620 is comical. A lot of them. And note that i'm a defender of ICs in turntables, i'm not from the school that says "oohh IC bad, discrete good", however there are owners that abuse their turntables, as simple as that.
So I guess nothing is reliable right? Where do we stand?
How do you treat a turntable will always have an impact on the performance and/or reliablity. Put your SL-1300 on a horribly humid climate and it's just a matter of time until bad contacts or cold solder joints or failed capacitors wreak havoc with the performance. Maybe the turntable will still turn, but it will not meet original specs.
I find it not reasonable to think that Technics somehow created more reliable electronics than Sony. And, as mentioned, to say that Sony introduced more complexity in their models is a wrong generalization.