• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

What do you do to set gain when bi or tri-amping?

I thought it might be cool to find out what practices others use to set up gain?

I mainly use the attenuators on my active crossovers to set the voltage gain for the different amps around the same level. Then I use a mic and RTA to confirm that the levels are within the ballpark of having a flat bandwidth. Final adjustments take several days/weeks by playing a wide variety of music I am very familiar with. I memorize the flat response settings and also the settings I like. Most times, the flat settings do not very good to my ears. So I suit to taste. Then I only use the preamp only to adjust gain.

There are a few occasions where I do adjust the crossovers or voltage gain just because I feel like it. :)
 
An ear is pretty much the point of this whole exercise. Sounds simplistic, but when it sounds right you've got it. Occasional tweaks required depending on the source and what they're playing.
 
I have bi-amped several times with mixed success. I ran a pair of Yamaha M-2 amps into a pair of bi-ampable Soliloquy 6.5 speakers. I really did not need the watts but wanted to be able to attenuate the mid and high range a little. The M-2 has ability to attenuate each channel. I've also tried Yamaha B-2 and M-4 in this mix but usally had less than a positive improvement with different amps in the mix. All of these amps had internal attenuation capability to level match to my liking. I also used a db meter several times to level out the crossover frequencies.

In the end I never found a bi-amp setup in combination with passive crossover speakers that give me the results I was looking for with one major exception. I used a Decware switchbox attenuator to trim a Modwright amplifier in combination with a 2A3 SET amp and the results were exceptional. One of my favorite setups of all time with the Soliloquy speakers. I think the quality was mostly luck but it did work quite well. Even with this setup I have to slightly change the attenuation mix depending on the volume I was listening to. This may have been caused by secondary effects from the room.

Now I use a four band active crossover with four stereo amps, two subs and three way speakers. But this is a different subject the OP asked not to touch.
 
Last edited:
The itch began when I bought a used pair of Vandy 2C speakers. I read up on the Vandersteen site about bi-wiring and bi-amping. Tried bi-wiring first, and results were so-so. Then I tried a pair of monoblocks, and that was OK. Other amps rotated thru, and a Luxman A-007 (35 wpc) really sounded good, but the bass was slightly lacking. THEN I noticed the pre-out on the back panel. I could run a woofer amp off the same volume control! I tried a few amps I had on hand, including a Nuvo power amp (70 wpc) which had sounded nasty in full-range use. As a bass amp, it really shone, and gave me more articulate bass than any of my other amps. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I have horozontal passive bi-amping.
 
I like the idea of passive vertical amplification with two identical amplifiers that have L&R gain controls
One amp controls one speaker, specifically one woofer instead of two.
I also find with vertical bi amplification that I can adjust either the low or high frequency gain to my taste, either of which seems to sound more robust.
Very simple and all adjustments by ear.
 
I like the idea of passive vertical amplification with two identical amplifiers that have L&R gain controls
One amp controls one speaker, specifically one woofer instead of two.
I also find with vertical bi amplification that I can adjust either the low or high frequency gain to my taste, either of which seems to sound more robust.
Very simple and all adjustments by ear.
The other big advantage as far as I'm concerned is you have a separate power supply feeding each bass woofer. To me that really was a big difference in the accuracy, tightness of the bass. Maybe placebo but I actually think it improved rhythm and pace. The recovery of the end of the bass note seems to snap into place in a good way. The following note seems to go maybe deeper and faster. I noticed a distinct separation in instrument placement. Its like there is more room or space between the instruments.
 
my speakers if you follow the factory recommendations use identical amps when bi amping, so no sweat. As the crossover is at 400 Hz, I used a volt meter and set the amps to both put out 2.8 volts with the same 400 Hz input. Later on when I tri amped I set the bass amp for the desired sensitivity of 2.5 volts for 105 watts out. Then using a spectrum analyzer with the bass section putting out 90 db at 4ft I adjusted the out put of the mid/tweeter section for the flattest response, using a parametric EQ for final minor touch ups. Once completed I then add super tweeters for smooth integration above 10 kHz with the third amp set at the same 2.5 volt sensitivity and using the levels on the crossover. Then I backed off to the listening position to adjust any minor room bumps below 2000 hz. And I mean minor. To much manipulation will mess up the direct sound from the speaker even though the total reverberant room sound will make your display show flat.
 
This thread is NOT a debate about bi-amping. If you ARE bi-amping please share and participate. I also would like it to NOT turn into an argument over passive and active crossovers. Of course everyone has an opinion and they are welcome to share, but please don't let that take over the topic of gain matching and calibrating.

I've been experimenting with bi and tri-amping. I thought it might be cool to find out what practices others use to set up gain?

In verticle bi-amping I'ts pretty easy. But things get more complicated when you horizontal bi or tr-amp.

With verticle I literally use a db meter and average multiple samples to fine tune it in. But that would not work with horizontal.

I haven't done it yet… but I'm toying with verticle bi-amping my woofer and mids and then horizontal bi-amping my tweeters. But that would compliment gain setting a lot.

What do you guys do?
I work with active crossovers constantly and I just turn the amps up till just before I can hear anything noisey coming from them. Most amps can just be set to max gain and not have anything noisey start but others need to be backed off a tiny bit to stay out of any ultra sensitive input levels.

Then I've done many different tests to get it set so the handoff or crossover point is at the same level with the loss and highs by DB meter but that's only to get it near the setting. You still need to see how the wave is formed since there might be a dip or peak at the crossover point or 1 just begore5 or after that might be able to be controlled by turning up or down one or both may help flatten it but from my experience with 60 or so free programs like REW I can't trust any of them to show trustable results.


So know I do it the best esy. I sit in my listening position and see if the found image and stage are matched pet side with just highs. Then I add bass on both sides and sit and listen to see if the image and stage remains centered and focused. Then I cut the highs and use a DB meter to check that the crossover point is set correctly and then I look at the levels in DBS 1 at a time then match them. Turn off the lows and check the crossover points for same frequency and to make sure the highs are actually reaching that point and slightly behind as the slope says it should. Then check dbs on highs to match . Then I turn on only one side I take a db reading then I play a tone that's centered on the crossover point and turn off the the highs of the lows to see if the meter goes up (property phased) or goes down (out of phase) adjust, retest. Then the other dude same thing. Then add them both and measure for in phase again with both sides. Adjust and retest till a drivers are in phase and same levels
Then I listen and make personal taste adjustments as I please. I will sometimes use my dual 31 band eq if I find anything that can't be fixed without it typically I have 2 points in the lows at 63 needs a 3db cut and 80 needs a 1.5db cut. Highs need a 1db cut at 800 and a 2db boost at 1.2k. then it sounds correct and image is like they are right ther
Ie staging is huge and things need to remain positioned even as notes change with each instrument. If there's movement with an instrumentdud to changed in notes playing then there needs to be right and left side frequency adjustments to correct imbalance of tones. This typically takes me about a month of minor adjustments before I have it perfect for my listing spot.

I honestly can't think of any other way that it can be done and have the best possible sound. It's not going to be set up in an afternoon bevause you need to listen to different tunes to check it out properly.

There's also speaker placrment that needs to be done before eq is introduced since that alone can fix issues that cannot be corrected with crossover settings and phase issues can be caused by placement and can become huge problems when a driver is out by 90 degrees to all others. It will never be able to be set I phase without phase changing ability and typically a physical move needs to take place rather than digitally or actively manipulating it or forcing it into submission to match ithers6. Time alignment features in DSPs are typically useless and only work when things are 10 feet or more in distance and not for 2 inches . Proven that people can't hear when a driver is up to 10 away from the others that make up that sides sound spectrum. This is when drivers are inline with each other but one is moved back further than the other. Moving a tweeter physically behind the woofer and staying in line will be difficult for anyone to be able to tell where it is just by listening. The smearing won't be heard until they are over 10 feet away from each other in distance to the listrners.

This doesn't mean that aligning signals is of no use but it suggests that if they are not perfectly aligned most people can't tell anyway and there's little need to strive for perfection when th signals are constantly changing frequencies that themselves travel at different speeds so one frequency is aligned in the center of the final band but everything higher lower is coming in before or after the middle find arrives. So yes in theory, time alignment is a principal and is unattainable to be set to have each frequency meet your ears exactly at the same time.
It's also not in nature for frequencies of different lengths to reach your ears at the same time most noise we hear is refected off of something while we hear it and after it's heard the brain figures it out for us.

If you sit near field, then it's a different story and you want to reduce size and number of drivers to be able to have the closest tightest band of sound coming from a single point to maintain the correctness of the original source and reduce reflections to maintain imaging and sound stage. This is where solid mid-range reproduction becomes important. No actve crossover needed for single driver systems. No time alignment needed. No crossover parts needed. Quality drivers are important in single driver systems to cover the most frequencies possible with less regard to overall volume in db.

Thetes no wrong way to set up anything but there are logical ways that will get you there in fewer steps but each step needs to be done to be sure youre on the right path as you progress. Skipping one will create a problem that will require you to back track. Forgetting to check phase is common most people think that their speakers are set up properly from the factory and even worse people think that their used speakers are set up properly when it's a huge problem when people are instantly ripping apart crossovers and they have no idea of what they're doing and are just grabbing hold of the fads created in these forums where everyone's first advice is to alter their speakers and the people that do it often have no clue what they're actually doing and speaker wires are constantly being reversed because they don't look at schematics to check the proper wiring.
 
I drove everything with a receiver with pre/main jacks. Use integrated amps for the mids and highs in the chain, regular power amps at the end of the chain. Cover your eyes now, "Audiophiles." I used the integrated amp's tone controls to be able to attenuate, or enhance tone levels where needed. Obviously an active crossover would be better, but I had to use what I had. The biggest amp, of course, was at the end of the chain driving the bass in the main speakers which were, in my case, Corner Horns. Those are very easy to bi/tri amp, by the way. Again, Audiophiles cover your eyes. Best sounding system I ever had, and I surely hated to give it up.
 
realizing this is an old thread, this stuff pops up on the regular.
same fights everytime.

I've got this celebrated genius, who agonized over the filter design in my speakers. The caps look like coffee cans and the coils look like a spool of copper weld for a mig. He spent money to make them that way. With some guy like way smarter, with trained ears designing those crossovers or filters... why would I think I know better?

i agree with you here.
vertically biamped, myself.
 
realizing this is an old thread, this stuff pops up on the regular.
same fights everytime.

I've got this celebrated genius, who agonized over the filter design in my speakers. The caps look like coffee cans and the coils look like a spool of copper weld for a mig. He spent money to make them that way. With some guy like way smarter, with trained ears designing those crossovers or filters... why would I think I know better?

i agree with you here.
vertically biamped, myself.
I didn't really see this as a fight. It is a practical answer to a workable way of putting more power into your system, if you have no active crossovers. I have seen people here say there is really no usable gain doing this. And, of course, these people would certainly not entertain the use of tone controls to limit certain frequencies to certain speakers. That IS a poor way to do it. It is just a workaround if you have plenty of amps laying around By the way....I forgot to mention that one needs a few Y signal cable adapters to split these outputs to other preamps and amps.
I am actually doing this right now with the considerably abbreviated system I am stuck with. My very capable Sherwood receiver (a TON of inputs and outputs) is driving a Marantz PM500 integrated amp to my small bookshelf speakers for mids and highs, using the tone controls to remove the bass, and through my Numark equalizer ( I know, I know), to remove the upper mids and highs, to my Heathkit AA1600, using that amp to drive two 15in Woofers for bass. Considering my poor listening room, it doesn't sound bad. I have to work with what I have.
 
I didn't really see this as a fight. It is a practical answer to a workable way of putting more power into your system, if you have no active crossovers. I have seen people here say there is really no usable gain doing this. And, of course, these people would certainly not entertain the use of tone controls to limit certain frequencies to certain speakers. That IS a poor way to do it. It is just a workaround if you have plenty of amps laying around By the way....I forgot to mention that one needs a few Y signal cable adapters to split these outputs to other preamps and amps.
I am actually doing this right now with the considerably abbreviated system I am stuck with. My very capable Sherwood receiver (a TON of inputs and outputs) is driving a Marantz PM500 integrated amp to my small bookshelf speakers for mids and highs, using the tone controls to remove the bass, and through my Numark equalizer ( I know, I know), to remove the upper mids and highs, to my Heathkit AA1600, using that amp to drive two 15in Woofers for bass. Considering my poor listening room, it doesn't sound bad. I have to work with what I have.
i am a proponent of biamping. currently set up in vertical biamp. thinking that the bass channels would not be competing for current. all in my head, im sure.
i have 3 amps, same model. 1 is in reserve, for the moment. im considering using it for the top end and 1 each bass section.
im wondering if the top end might lose some cohesiveness. only 1 way to find out.
 
We added up the watts in my system as it was setup for a week or so. All together, the amps and integrated amps was just over 2000wpc. That was with my other 200wpc Heathkit power amp that I no longer have. It was driving the sub woofers, which we couldn't hear over the Corner Horns anyway. Obviously, I was not actually using near that much power...who would try to put 500 watts or so into the Horns and tweeters of Corner Horns??
That was with my Phase Linear power amp, which I really miss. That was before people were putting in the later speaker safety circuits that have come out since then.
All I have left from that whole system is the Sherwood Receiver, one of my two Marantz 500s, the Heathkit AA1600 a Kenwood power amp (can't remember the number..it is stored), and the two 15in sub woofers. My Corner Horns, Technics 1506 RtR, Pioneer 707 RtR, the Phase Linear power amp, two cd/dvd changers, two TTs, a Nakamichie Cassette deck (NOT a dragon!) and other odds and ends. And the music room I built specifically for the Corner Horns! Oh....and my '57 Chevy station wagon!! LOL
 
This is just what I do. I will leave some details out as they are not relevant to this discussion.

Equipment : Preamp - Heavily modified to give the required levels for the crossovers. 2 modified Behringer 2310 analogue crossovers set-up for 3 way operation. I use a 6 channel Rotel RB976Mk2 power amp, modified and upgraded. Each pair of amplifiers have a separate input level control. This is configured for 3-way horizontal tri-amping. The voltage gain of all the amplifiers is obviously identical. The speakers are my design and build, and are transmission lines with the mid/high units separated into a smaller cabinet that's mounted above the bass units.

Set-up: The starting point is to set all the power amps at 50% level and all the crossover levels at the mid position. Select the crossover points (in my case, 350Hz and 1.8KHz).
Using a calibrated mic and signal generator with REW measure the levels through individual drivers (others switched off) at just above and just below the applicable crossover points. This gives the relative frequency related system levels. I then adjust the output gains on the crossovers to give matching level values across each crossover frequency region. This takes varying driver efficiencies into account, Take a note of these settings as it is your base line (not bass line, sic). Now carryout frequency sweeps across the entire audio range and adjust the system levels to suit. I found that I needed to boost the bass a little on the power amps to allow for baffle step correction. One reason for selecting 350Hz for the bass/mid crossover point is that the start of the bass rolloff coincides with the calculated baffle step frequency for the cabinets.

In fact, on the system as it stands, the input buffers on the crossovers are set at 1.5dB & 2dB high and the crossover output levels are set slightly differently to account for imbalances caused by room effects, but they are fairly close.

At any time you can always go back to your baseline values and fine tune it again (you did remember to write them down didn't you?).

The drivers I selected for the speaker build exhibit very flat response curves at the chosen crossover settings. This was done on purpose as with no passive crossovers it is difficult to tweak the driver responses as you can with passive filters. Incidentally, I do have a 6 channel DSP, but I wanted to keep this system analogue purposely.

With any fully active set-up I think it's important to build it as a complete system, as opposed to treating it as a set of individual components wired together as you maybe would with a passive system. It's difficult to swap out individual items without affecting everything else.

Advantages:
Improved dynamics, increased amplifier headroom, no electrical interaction between speaker drivers, no interaction between drivers and crossovers.

Disadvantages:
Complexity, cost, not plug and play- knowledge and experience required to set them up, upgrading difficulties, not good for inexperience users.

Just my take on it. Would I go back to passives for my main system ...............Not a chance!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom