Got a pair of every one of the UltraDiscs BUT Abraxas (wasn't paying attention at the time), one copy for play and the other stays sealed. Between my oldest boy and I we've pretty much got a copy of every one of the original MFSL catalog, including the Beetles and Sinatra box sets, as well as a number of Nautilus, CBS Mastersounds (lotsa EQing probs there, e.g. Meatloaf BooH) and exception to the MFSL UHQRs. 40+ smackers for an album back in the 80's was a bit steep for my pocketbook and now I'm shelling out a buck and a 1/4 for the new UDOS.
In my mind the new UDOSs sound rivals that of the 80s UHQRs, but until I hear an apples/apples test between the 2 formats (e.g. DSotM/DSotM or Crime of the Century/CotC, etc.) I'll still reserve my complete judgement. However, I have compared the first OMR release of Breakfast in America to the newest OMR release and I preferred the sound quality of the newer release.
Say what you will about audiophile pressings but in my listening just about every one I've heard sounded better than any standard pressing of the same album. If you think they are over priced...well...don't buy it, and nobody here should be thinking anything less of you. But unless you own one maybe two or you've sat down and compared one on a properly set up system your opinion is irrelevant.
I have witnessed some who've spent more on one TT, cartridge, phono pre and cables than I did on my 3 Corvettes, and yet spin an $8.00 mass produced piece of plastic and say it sounds just as good as an audiophile pressing....wow, REALLY?!
If the recorded quality of the master tape sucks then typically the reproduction copies will also suffer in sound quality.
Garbage in, garbage out, if your source material sucks then the outputted sound will be too...period.
Generally a record like this resold later that's OOP will have more value sealed. Most people will trust and take a chance on the manufacturer work knowing the seller hasn't touched it. Opposed to the seller saying they opened it to make sure it was fine without manufacturer defects but never played. Did they really never play it?Just curious about other people’s thoughts on this. It’s a dilemma where opening it up to verify all is good may lower value vs a sealed copy, but at least you know all is good. Vs keeping it sealed and maybe ending up have an imperfect copy when it’s finally opened.
Generally a record like this resold later that's OOP will have more value sealed. Most people will trust and take a chance on the manufacturer work knowing the seller hasn't touched it. Opposed to the seller saying they opened it to make sure it was fine without manufacturer defects but never played. Did they really never play it?
I for one always think there is a reason a open copy is sold especially if it's a new record. Lots of people buy new records and then they are not happy with the SQ.
Just IMHO here, but buying records to keep them sealed is like buying cars to keep them parked in the garage.
Use it, enjoy it, and don't be a "I keep plastic on my furniture" kinda person....
jblnut
So if I buy two or three copies of the same title, it's your opinion I'm supposed to open all of them?Just IMHO here, but buying records to keep them sealed is like buying cars to keep them parked in the garage.
Use it, enjoy it, and don't be a "I keep plastic on my furniture" kinda person....
jblnut
So if I buy two or three copies of the same title, it's your opinion I'm supposed to open all of them?
Even if I don't buy multiple copies of a title, I know I buy more new records faster than I can listen to them all. Not to mention when I first buy them I might not be in the mood to listen to it, but it's in my library when the mood strikes...if at all.
I like the security of multiple copies of something, it only takes one little slip and you can wreck a record. I also don't see a problem buying more than one as depending on the record it can gain value after it goes out of print. So if I get two records new at the price of $35 each, when it's OOP it goes for $75, I just got a free record. And this is the low side, it's hard to say some record really jump in price.
I also don't take the shrink wrap off, I just cut a slit to get the record out, you see the better one takes care of their records the more value they have to others. We don't live forever nor do we all keep our records for ever. Me I like having the "Best" records I can have because...that's just me.

Your welcomeCouldn't have said this any better myself, thanks!
one copy for play and the other stays sealed. Between my oldest boy and I we've pretty much got a copy of every one of the original MFSL catalog, including the Beetles and Sinatra box sets,



Generally a record like this resold later that's OOP will have more value sealed. Most people will trust and take a chance on the manufacturer work knowing the seller hasn't touched it. Opposed to the seller saying they opened it to make sure it was fine without manufacturer defects but never played. Did they really never play it?
I for one always think there is a reason a open copy is sold especially if it's a new record. Lots of people buy new records and then they are not happy with the SQ.
Your welcome
I should have also added when I buy extra copies I then have them for others that want them later.
Well I have a MFSL you most likely don't have, when it came out it was a $20-$25 record
Open copy
View attachment 1606949
Sealed copy
View attachment 1606951
View attachment 1606952
The open copy is at least $700-$800, Sealed copies go for $2000+, so as far as I'm concerned, I'll buy dups and keep some sealed.
However, I sold a sealed bottle of 7up with a big bug in the bottom of the bottle many years ago for 237 times what I paid for it.
