We have an AudioQuest, but it is only so-so. The Levin Design Dry Cleaning Brush is the one we settled on. It’s made in Germany using hand-pulled horse or Chinese goat’s hair. It does an exquisite job.
View attachment 2448552 View attachment 2448553
I use a goat hair brush (Revolv brand) but only for scrubbing a record that is wet with cleaning fluid. I've found that dry brushing records (no matter what type of brush) tends to (over time) increase the number of pops and clicks. If a record looks like it may have dust or lint or ??? particles on it, I'll rinse it in distilled H2O with a drop or two of spin clean concentrate and about 5 ml of Isopropyl in the Spin Clean and vacuum it with my Record Doctor V. Then let it dry thoroughly before playing. When albums are new or newly purchases used, I clean them via UltraSonic Cleaning, rinse, vacuum and dry before playing. If on first play they still have some lead-in groove dirt, I'll scrub the outer 1/2 inch or so with cleaning fluid and the Goat Hair brush - before yet another US clean, rinse then dry.

Looks well crafted @Jazz Junkie !
For a quick clean, I have tried different brushes. I have an ultra-fine (50 micron) brush that is supposed to fit inside the grooves. I also have the velvet pad type. Both types just push the dust around into a line, but does not really take them off. Then I tried a 'sticky' roller that does the best job at removing dirt and dust (outside of a thorough cleaning).
View attachment 2448575
The sticky roller (the one in blue) seems to be very effective for cleaning out surface dirt and dust. But I don't find a lot of vinyl aficionados using it. Any particular reason why it is not popular? Might it be harmful to my records?


View attachment 2448575
The sticky roller (the one in blue) seems to be very effective for cleaning out surface dirt and dust. But I don't find a lot of vinyl aficionados using it. Any particular reason why it is not popular? Might it be harmful to my records?
![IMG_0011[1].jpg IMG_0011[1].jpg](/forums/data/attachments/2322/2322811-bc4c57025b6edc61fef8a6a05a517f0b.jpg?hash=vExXAltu3G)
I use a Discwasher brush too. I use mine with VPI's cleaning fluid. If that isn't enough I fire up the 17.0 cleaning machine. If I played records more often I might update machine. But I am happy with it and with proper care of my records I only have to use it most of the time when I purchase pre-owned LP's. replacing old record jackets really reduces the record from being compromised.
IMO 'on TT cleaning' is no longer the best approach. Far better is the use of actual RCM's. I have a VPI 16.5 which has proven to be adequate over the years but last year I added a ultrasonic Degritter and it has taken Lp cleaning to another level. I therefore believe 'brushes' are for a quick swipe prior to playback. With that being said, any brushing of ones Lp that does not aide in conducting static electricity from the surface is useless.
As I said over on the WBF where this is also being discussed, my favorite all time brush...........
View attachment 2448730

I use the Kirmuss brush that came with my Kirmuss RCM. One side is a parastatic felt cloth, same as the Watts Parostatik Disc Preener from the 70’s, the other side is carbon fiber bristles.
I give the LP three rotations using the parastatic side, then the brush flips in the handle and I give it three more rotations on the carbon fiber side.
View attachment 2448633
View attachment 2448635
But the first step is the Zerostat!
