• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

What's the best looking DIGITAL receiver of all time?

Heathkit AR-1515:

HC1979-11.jpg


84469-xxxrare_heathkit_ar1515_receiver__highend.jpg


84470-xxxrare_heathkit_ar1515_receiver__highend.jpg
 
I've always like the Pioneer elite receivers, here's my Sc-09 in all its digital glory. Next is my B&K 507s2 to me a solid clean look. Last is my Yamaha RXZ-1 I've always liked there clean yet bold looks. I vote for the RXZ-9 also but I can't find a picture of the one I owned.

Audiofreak71 E1E83567-C9AD-407E-9E7F-16845C9073DC.JPG E18EC6BE-C107-43B5-9B16-EDE316DDF82E.JPG IMG_6198.JPG
 
So far I am liking the ones on this page. Otherwise not so much. Interesting that the designers haven't been able to do a great digital look.
 
McIntosh MAC 4280 is a favorite, love that first HeathKit digital, built one for a neighbor who didn't have time to finish it. Paid me well. Went to buy one, discontinued.
 
Those Pioneer Elites may be perhaps the best looking post 2000 receivers.
I agree there pretty damn sexy just wish they had better sound in 2ch, great sound in home theater just not my taste for 2ch listening, could be the class D amps I don't like, who knows, either way a damn good looking and beast of an Uber receiver.

Audiofreak71
 
This thread should be titled, "What's the best looking receiver with a digital display"

A digital receiver implies class D amplification.

Digital receiver? This can receive five digits if you put it on correctly ... ;-}

kitchen-gloves-chicken-medium-51257.jpg
 
Here's an XR55 with the "full digital amplifier" logo which has nothing to do with it's display. Totally reliable, mine has been in daily use for the last 10 years. It even has a handy bi-amp feature.

64825-panasonic_saxr55_digital_71_receiver__black.jpg
 
I agree, the JVC RX-1010V is pretty much the one that sets the bar. :)

I've got a RX-1001V and here's a pic of its insane remote in pieces (leaking caps needed replacing)...

IMG_1730.JPG

IMG_1728.JPG

Full learning remote with customisable backlit touch screen LCD- all in 1989/90.
IMG_1727.JPG

It is a beast.

rx-1001v.JPG
(not my pic)

I think the RX-1001V would set the record for the most number of buttons on any front panel, I'll dig out the front panel sometime- I never bothered to restore the unit after buying it cheap years ago. It has rosewood sides and is rather attractive IMO- if you like buttons and lots of VFD real estate.

If you like the 1010, check out the RX-1050!
 
I agree, the JVC RX-1010V is pretty much the one that sets the bar. :)

I've got a RX-1001V and here's a pic of its insane remote in pieces (leaking caps needed replacing)...

View attachment 1012869

View attachment 1012870

Full learning remote with customisable backlit touch screen LCD- all in 1989/90.
View attachment 1012871

It is a beast.

View attachment 1012859
(not my pic)

I think the RX-1001V would set the record for the most number of buttons on any front panel, I'll dig out the front panel sometime- I never bothered to restore the unit after buying it cheap years ago. It has rosewood sides and is rather attractive IMO- if you like buttons and lots of VFD real estate.

If you like the 1010, check out the RX-1050!
Jeesus jebbezus did I count 79 buttons on that?What on earth were they thinking?
 
I agree there pretty damn sexy just wish they had better sound in 2ch, great sound in home theater just not my taste for 2ch listening, could be the class D amps I don't like, who knows, either way a damn good looking and beast of an Uber receiver.

Audiofreak71
Yeah I heard that the sound in 2 channel doesn't quite match the looks on these.
 
Back
Top Bottom