So when you read reviews in these "audiophile" sites/magazines you have to weed through all the glowing praise (they want to keep their jobs and keep getting free equipment to test) to find out what they are really trying to tell you, and in the case of the Nd3 & Nd5 it is not good... $675 for a "flinty" sounding nude elliptical stylus? Those cost less than $150... just more of the same overpriced poor sounding stuff from Rega. Here are some cherry picked excerpts from the review:
The stylus profile for the Nd3 is an elliptical, manmade polycrystalline diamond, while the Nd5 uses an elliptical nude diamond... It didn’t offer the last word in transparency, detail, or layering... There wasn’t the deeply layered sound stage nor the micro-level detail of an MC cart... Although the stage occasionally felt somewhat condensed and confused, the sound never lacked punch or impact... An occasional flinty quality also pervaded the treble...