Kreshna
...but I have to know.
Alright, I often read chip amps being described as having sound similar to that of tube amps. Why? Are there really similar characteristics between chip amplifiers and tube amplifiers? And if there are, what are they?
This one is an example:
So, while the reviewer refrained from calling Patek SE tube-sounding, he admitted there are resemblances between Patek SE and tube amps, which are treble elegance, performer mass, and warmth.
An article about DIY TK2050 Tripath amp:
So, Tripath TK2050 is described as haviing 50%-60% of warmth and mellowness of a tube amp.
Now it's Hypex UcD:
While Hypex UcD is described as 'very different from the T-Amp', it's also described as having sound similar to single ended triode unit. Yup, Hypex UcD 180 sounds similar to a SET amp. Well at least according to the reviewer.
Tripath: Death Knell for the Vacuum Tube:
Another chip amp described as having 85% to 90% of sound quality of a good tube amp. In fact, the reviewer said 'a good EL 34 amp with balls'.
I also noticed that most people drive full range single-driver loudspeakers using either SET tube amp (but not push-pull tube amp) or chip amp (either Tripath or gainclone). I have never read about people driving full range single-driver loudspeakers using traditional class A/B amp.
Why? Why is that? What are the characteristics that both tube amps and chip amps have, but class A/B amps don't have?
This one is an example:
I have -- deliberately I might add -- refrained from calling the Patek SE tube-sounding. It's not. A quick detour into DeHavilland 845 or Canary Audio 300B land would show you quickly if you doubted. They're softer, less articulate.
Still, there are distinct traits that bear an uncanny resemblance - treble elegance, performer mass and, related to the latter, a fetching degree of warmth. What's more solid-statish is the exceptional speed (unless we turned to something choice as Roger Hebert's Wyetech Labs paralleled 300B Sapphires for one example I have personal experience with).
Still, there are distinct traits that bear an uncanny resemblance - treble elegance, performer mass and, related to the latter, a fetching degree of warmth. What's more solid-statish is the exceptional speed (unless we turned to something choice as Roger Hebert's Wyetech Labs paralleled 300B Sapphires for one example I have personal experience with).
So, while the reviewer refrained from calling Patek SE tube-sounding, he admitted there are resemblances between Patek SE and tube amps, which are treble elegance, performer mass, and warmth.
An article about DIY TK2050 Tripath amp:
What about the sound quality? It exceeds my expectation! It is powerful yet has 50-60% of the warmth and mellowness from a tube amplifier. I can't complain with so less effort and money being put into this little project. I believe my friend should be very happy this DIY audio project.
So, Tripath TK2050 is described as haviing 50%-60% of warmth and mellowness of a tube amp.
Now it's Hypex UcD:
As a matter of fact the presentation of sound is quite similar to a good class A amplifier or a single ended triode unit. Something - so to say - very different from the T-Amp, that I'll use as a reference, just because it is another widely known example of new Class-D technology amplifier.
The sound is clear, rather transparent, precise, detailed, with that specific "lucid" presentation typical of triode units.
Low frequencies are well present and controlled, even though perhaps not as much as you would expect from an amplifer with a damping factor of 400. The entire bass range is definitely round and full, pleasant and effective, exactly as it happens with many tubed amp systems.
The sound is clear, rather transparent, precise, detailed, with that specific "lucid" presentation typical of triode units.
Low frequencies are well present and controlled, even though perhaps not as much as you would expect from an amplifer with a damping factor of 400. The entire bass range is definitely round and full, pleasant and effective, exactly as it happens with many tubed amp systems.
While Hypex UcD is described as 'very different from the T-Amp', it's also described as having sound similar to single ended triode unit. Yup, Hypex UcD 180 sounds similar to a SET amp. Well at least according to the reviewer.
Tripath: Death Knell for the Vacuum Tube:
I just got my Griffin PowerWave and after listening for three hours I am still slack-jawed at what I'm hearing: a good EL 34 amp with balls.
Despite the cheesy connectors and such, this little $100 miracle gives you 85 to 90 percent of a good tube amp. The detail, focus, speed, and imaging may not be the Nth degree like good tube designs but it is CLOSE. More importantly, the PowerWave has an astonishing tube-like palpablity not heard out of most solid state designs. And, this I'm saying about a cheese box that NEVER gets warm (except for that annoying blue light on top.)
Despite the cheesy connectors and such, this little $100 miracle gives you 85 to 90 percent of a good tube amp. The detail, focus, speed, and imaging may not be the Nth degree like good tube designs but it is CLOSE. More importantly, the PowerWave has an astonishing tube-like palpablity not heard out of most solid state designs. And, this I'm saying about a cheese box that NEVER gets warm (except for that annoying blue light on top.)
Another chip amp described as having 85% to 90% of sound quality of a good tube amp. In fact, the reviewer said 'a good EL 34 amp with balls'.
I also noticed that most people drive full range single-driver loudspeakers using either SET tube amp (but not push-pull tube amp) or chip amp (either Tripath or gainclone). I have never read about people driving full range single-driver loudspeakers using traditional class A/B amp.
Why? Why is that? What are the characteristics that both tube amps and chip amps have, but class A/B amps don't have?
Last edited:
