Brilliant! thanks for share!The table below shows what I consider identical performance of the clones to the original BA312's
Brilliant! thanks for share!The table below shows what I consider identical performance of the clones to the original BA312's
Nice work, aldena007!I just finished the evaluation of the BA312 clones both through hole and smd versions. Both types worked fine without any added noise or distortion. The test pcb is the F-2541 "Equalizer Circuit Board" and the BA312 IC's are the phono pre amps. I chose these to test since accessibility was decent and the phono pre-amp can be switched in and out from the rest of the tone control circuits for comparison of the noise floor.
View attachment 2394189
To begin the testing I checked the voltages with the OEM BA312 IC's to get a baseline on the pin IO per the Sansui Service Manual. I then installed 7 pin headers and tested the through hole BA312 "clones" then the SMD clones. The IC clones worked nicely and there was not any artifacts or distortion introduced into the signal path. I played a record alblum [Talking Heads "Stop making Sense"] to evaluate the playback. My subjective evaluation was that the phono playback was fully equal to the original BA312 playback. During the playback I took laser temperature readings of the 312 clones and surrounding components and temperatures were normally just above ambient room temperature. The subjective part of the test was certainly passing. I also took the voltage measurements of the original BA312's, Through Hole clone, and SMD clone. The table below shows what I consider identical performance of the clones to the original BA312's
Just curious-when you listened to the unit for noise from the phono stage, did you short the phono inputs to ground?On the noise floor question. The test 9090 was one that I have been working on for several months. One thing I had been able to do was to get the unit dead quiet while with no audio signal in play. The BA312's did not create any detectable noise to my ear. I would expect this since the BA312 clone is just a reverse engineered circuit of an old design. There is nothing new in the clones that would impact the noise floor that the original BA312 IC design can or cannot do. The SMD version seemed to improve the phono input a little but I only evaluated the clone by my own hearing. The playback of the LP was excellent. I think the best the clone can do is duplicate the original IC performance which it easily does.

On the noise floor question. The test 9090 was one that I have been working on for several months. One thing I had been able to do was to get the unit dead quiet while with no audio signal in play. The BA312's did not create any detectable noise to my ear. I would expect this since the BA312 clone is just a reverse engineered circuit of an old design. There is nothing new in the clones that would impact the noise floor that the original BA312 IC design can or cannot do. The SMD version seemed to improve the phono input a little but I only evaluated the clone by my own hearing. The playback of the LP was excellent. I think the best the clone can do is duplicate the original IC performance which it easily does.



I just saw this item on the big auction site. It looks interesting and at $20.00 the price is right. I ordered two of them and when they arrive next week I will install them in a Marantz 2275 I am restoring that has a bad BA312. I will post the results once I receive and install them. Is anyone familiar with this particular device?
Thanks!
View attachment 2655214

I hope he can get the 9090 FM working.