Just speculation; would love to hear the opinions of anyone who has owned all the relevant models and compared them. Would a DQM-9 really be better than a DQ-10 or DQ-20?I'm sure the DQ's are far better than the DQM's but since I haven't heard them, I couldn't really comment on them.
What got me thinking about the DMQ9, is a pair of DMQ5's I picked up,they are really,really good.......
It makes me wonder about others....
I'm wondering about the treble extension on the DQ-20's????????
These DQM5's have one of the better tweeters Ive heard in awhile,ever so slighty hot,but my tubes make it sound really fun,smooth.
I like.
mcgarick
The DQM's are nice speakers. Not in the same league as the DQ's. The 12's are smaller versions of the 20's which are smaller than the 30's. The DQ10 are the grandpa's of the group. They are 1970's tech. The 12, 20 are early 80's the 30 are late 80's. The DQM's are 90's and the designer had changed. The company was under control of the been-counters. I have 5 DQ10s and I would still love to have some 20's.
Borus
I've got DQ-8s, 2 Pair of DQ-10s and a pair of DQ-12s.
...
DQ-12s are not bad - but I'm not driving them with very much power yet and like the mids/highs from them and use them for low level in my shop. When I want more bass I turn on my QLS-IIIs to fill out the sound. The DQ-12s get lost when I turn up the volume (again probably the amp).
The DQ-20s seem like a combo DQ-12 with the woofer from the DQ-10, haven't heard a set yet, but they do require a little coin to get a pair. There are allot of D-10s out there and can be had for a pair of Franklins if you watch for a while. I just got a primo pair a guy had in his basement for 10 years and never hooked them up and sold them on CL - Yay for me. The DQ-12s are a little more $ as are the DQ-8s for no good reason I can figure other than maybe more rare.
...
Cheers,
Bob
:yes: Mine sounded good enough when I got them I didn't really expect much improvement from a recap... but the difference was definitely audible!