likebike23
Addicted Member
true. like I said getting to the real number of infections, known or unknown is damn hard. The US is completely ignoring asymptomatic spread. the rest of the world is NOT. and our one sided reporting of deaths. in EVERY state, there are listed covid deaths of people that were in hospice...which is generally 1 day to at most 1 month?
but because the hospice worker came in and they developed a positive case, it gets counted as cv19, not whatever cancer or end game disease they had. 'make the numbers as bad as possible' was the order, and people obeyed and as the russians fear: the salt is mixed with the sugar (we use wheat/chaff in the US, but the russians have a different wise saying).
another illustration, we accept without question, that if you are 80 years old in my graph 1, you have a 95% chance of NOT dying from cv19 in graph 2. so gather up all the 80 year olds in the US that have not been infected previously, count em, times .05 and that number is the deaths of 80 year olds we will experience. now repeat for 0-79 and for 81-114? 115? using the known percentages.
and it works right? . If the model was linear. (it aint) (and if we knew the true number of infections - which we dont and wont investigate)
there is a REASON the MSM presents graphs and charts with the age ranges not evenly distributed, either by cardinal number or population heck, in the latest I have seen the 25-49 year olds lumped in in order to get a death rate that was as scary as the 50-55 why? Also, arguments for closing schools lump 0-18 together. well hell, in most places 0-4 dont even go to school and Im pretty sure there are at LEAST 3 tranches of the remainders grouped by actual school they goto (elem, middle high - ymmv) If we are willing to accept that a 1st grader going to school, influences the path of a 12grader going to school, then I guess we have to accept that going to walmart will affect lowes shoppers. Insane. utterly batchit insane.
I hear ya, it's tough to know what is true sometimes. I can agree with your assessment of the charts and graphs you described as being skewed. What I can't agree on is the characterization that doctors are fudging death certificates as part of some grand scheme to inflate covid deaths. First off, if you have terminal cancer and get hit by a train did you die of cancer? Nope. Second, no doctor I know is looking to knowingly falsify a patient's chart (a crime) for a few bucks for their employer. These people worked too damn hard and put up too much money to get where they are to throw it away.
