Do the research, google, you have had week(s) since the last discussion. Dr. Kunchur is a PHD. The AES is loaded with PHDs. They both recommend 24/96, not 16/44.1. I mentioned that in the other string and multiple times on this string. The PHD I addressed is
Director of Diagnostic Audiology
Instructor in Otology and Laryngology
For a major medical hospital. Time for a definition.
A "confound" is an aspect to address as it will skew the results. For instance, Cochlea Fatigue, Habituation to Stimuli. If you do not address them, the results will be skewed towards no sonic difference. Sight is not the only confound.
Do you understand now?
Simple. Virtually no confounds were addressed. The results will be skewed towards no sonic difference.
Show me where the spl, cochlea fatigue, habituation to stimuli have been addressed.
Cheers.
What the F*#@ does 24/96 and 16/44 have to do with the frequency responses I am discussing with regards to the live performance and the recording chain on its way to the vinyl?!?
And for Chrissake, STOP using "confounds" as if the word relates to a test.
If you want to say "confounding variables", then do so.
Calling confounding variables "confounds" does not make any more sense than when you did it in that other thread and were told by a dozen people you were/are wrong.
Further, your posts continue to read like a transcription of Chance the gardener speaking.
You use words and phrases that may somehow relate to a conversation, but really have no meaning.
I can do the same regarding any subject, but it doesn't mean I am ADDING to the conversation.
"Of all the systems I have heard your's is one of them. The frequency response has quite a varied range! Per Steve Schmeckel, PhD, it produces an emotional response in some people, but I'm not sure I believe all confounding variables have been addressed. I'll have to defer to AES reports (none of which I can quote) that there is a distinction between things that we all know about".
If you want to be involved, please address specific points and provide facts (not the same useless drivel that you posted in that last mess).
con·found
kənˈfound/Submit
verb
1.
cause surprise or confusion in (someone), esp. by acting against their expectations.
"the inflation figure confounded economic analysts"
synonyms: amaze, astonish, dumbfound, stagger, surprise, startle, stun, throw, shake, discompose, bewilder, bedazzle, baffle, mystify, bemuse, perplex, puzzle, confuse; More
prove (a theory, expectation, or prediction) wrong.
"the rise in prices confounded expectations"
synonyms: contradict, counter, invalidate, negate, go against, quash, explode, demolish, shoot down, destroy, disprove; More
defeat (a plan, aim, or hope).
"we will confound these tactics by the pressure groups"
archaic
overthrow (an enemy).
2.
mix up (something) with something else so that the individual elements become difficult to distinguish.
"'nuke' is now a cooking technique, as microwave radiation is confounded with nuclear radiation"
A
confounding variable is an extraneous variable (i.e., a variable that is not a focus of the study) that is statistically related to (or correlated with) the independent variable.
Confounding variables are NOT called "confounds".
IS IT CLEAR NOW?
...
