It's proven beyond a shadow of doubt that all threads discussing whether amplifiers sound the same, sound the same. As for the amplifiers, that remains under discussion.
Actually, I'd posit that this one doesn't ["sound the same"]. This one is very interesting, as one variable has been
entirely eliminated. We're only talking about
one flavor of loudspeaker design. I am assuming that all Harbeth products share a design philosophy and approach (which 1) I believe that they do and 2) an approach that I believe descends from the BBC LS-3/5A monitor specification).
The guy responsible for them says "all amplifiers sound the same". He, presumably has some experience and data (at least subjective) to substantiate his claim.
Someone else has the same speakers, different amplifiers, and draws a different conclusion.
Now, obviously, there are many, many variables --- but there is also one very significant constant: the electromechanical transducers themselves. A
very key link in the chain.
The answer is, I'd opine, actually quite simple to "all amps sound the same". All amps may sound the same when delivering signal to a completely nonreactive load (i.e., with an entirely invariant impedance curve as a function of frequency). Any loudspeaker deviating from such will interact with the amplifier supplying it with signal. This is Ohm's Law stuff (the AC variant, but, still...). Current, power, resistance, capacative reactance and inductive reactance are all inter-related.
As a side-note, Magneplanars (the panels therein, at least) do themselves present a remarkably nonreactive, almost pure resistive load to an amplifier. In theory, they should be less amplifier dependent than normal electrodynamic driver loudspeakers... but most of htem are so danged insensitive that it's kind of hard to tell
Let's look at a couple of loudspeaker impedance curves, courtesy of our friends at
Stereophile (one of the few publications any more that still goes to the effort of
measuring the performance of the things they test).
Harbeth Super HL-5 Plus
http://www.stereophile.com/content/harbeth-super-hl5plus-loudspeaker#vEMkPKz534RjVLOL.97
Fig.1 Harbeth Super HL5plus, electrical impedance (solid) and phase (dashed) (2 ohms/vertical div.).
Magnepan Magneplanar MG1.6/QR
http://www.stereophile.com/content/...-loudspeaker-measurements#z93izue5f3phCY1S.97
Fig.1 Magnepan MG1.6/QR, electrical impedance (solid) and phase (dashed) (2 ohms/vertical div.).
The midrange weirdness, AFAIK, arises from the crossover network. To quote
Stereophile:
Its impedance (fig.1) is basically that of a 4.5 ohm resistor, modified by the crossover, which results in the peak at 600Hz. Any good 4-ohm-rated amplifier should be able to drive the Maggie without difficulty. There are no cabinet resonances—the MG1.6/QR doesn't have a cabinet.
also...
The MG1.6/QR plays significantly quieter than the Thiel CS2.3 for the same voltage input. I estimated its B-weighted sensitivity at a low 83.7dB(B)/2.83V/m, though this will be moderated somewhat by its line-source behavior in-room.
